linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@free.fr>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>,
	MSM <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <kholk11@gmail.com>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64/io: Don't use WZR in writel
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 17:59:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0c06cb51-fc33-f2ba-e2b8-ad280b89f35c@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fbacd3df-41c4-f98a-8875-db654aff3a5c@free.fr>

On 18/03/2019 17:30, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> On 18/03/2019 18:19, Robin Murphy wrote:
> 
>> For the context bank reset, yes, I am assuming that no complier will
>> ever be perverse enough to detect that cfg is not written after the
>> NULL check and immediately reallocate it to XZR for no good reason.
>> I'd like to think that assumption is going to hold for the reasonable
>> scope of this particular workaround, though.
> 
> I'm not sure I understand the above paragraph.
> 
> In code such as:
> 
> 	if (val == 0) foo(val);
> 
> gcc's algorithm is likely to figure out that the code is equivalent to
> 
> 	if (val == 0) foo(0)
> 
> and perform constant-propagation, etc.
> 
> Is that what we're talking about?

As may already be apparent, the way I expect compilers to behave, and 
the way compilers actually behave, are two overlapping but distinct sets 
of concepts...

Robin.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-18 17:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-09 18:34 [PATCH] arm64/io: Don't use WZR in writel AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2019-02-11 10:57 ` Will Deacon
2019-02-11 11:52   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-02-11 14:29     ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2019-02-11 14:59       ` Marc Zyngier
2019-02-11 16:15         ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2019-02-11 16:37         ` Robin Murphy
2019-02-23 18:12         ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-02-23 18:37           ` Marc Zyngier
2019-02-24  3:53             ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-03-12 12:36               ` Marc Gonzalez
2019-03-18 16:04                 ` Robin Murphy
2019-03-18 17:00                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-03-18 17:11                     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-03-18 17:19                     ` Robin Murphy
2019-03-18 17:24                       ` Robin Murphy
2019-03-19 11:45                         ` Robin Murphy
2019-03-18 17:30                       ` Marc Gonzalez
2019-03-18 17:59                         ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2019-05-02 16:05                   ` Marc Gonzalez
2019-05-02 16:33                     ` Robin Murphy
2019-05-02 16:50                       ` Marc Gonzalez
2019-05-03 11:36                         ` Marc Gonzalez
2019-05-03 12:48                           ` Robin Murphy
2019-05-03 13:07                             ` Marc Gonzalez
2019-05-04 13:35                               ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2019-05-05 18:05                                 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2019-05-20 15:05                             ` Marc Gonzalez
2019-05-02 17:27                       ` Marc Gonzalez
2019-05-03  0:38                       ` Bjorn Andersson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-02-09 18:30 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0c06cb51-fc33-f2ba-e2b8-ad280b89f35c@arm.com \
    --to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=jhugo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=kholk11@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=marc.w.gonzalez@free.fr \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).