From: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
To: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, andy.teng@mediatek.com,
jejb@linux.ibm.com, chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com,
kuohong.wang@mediatek.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@wdc.com>,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, peter.wang@mediatek.com,
alim.akhtar@samsung.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
matthias.bgg@gmail.com, asutoshd@codeaurora.org,
chaotian.jing@mediatek.com, cc.chou@mediatek.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, beanhuo@micron.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] scsi: ufs: Cleanup completed request without interrupt notification
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 13:27:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1596432475.32283.10.camel@mtkswgap22> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3b144ed6897483d1ae3ced6de2dfc64c@codeaurora.org>
Hi Can,
On Mon, 2020-08-03 at 13:14 +0800, Can Guo wrote:
> Hi Stanley,
>
> On 2020-08-03 11:00, Stanley Chu wrote:
> > Hi Can,
> >
> > On Sat, 2020-08-01 at 07:17 +0800, Can Guo wrote:
> >> Hi Bart,
> >>
> >> On 2020-08-01 00:51, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> >> > On 2020-07-31 01:00, Can Guo wrote:
> >> >> AFAIK, sychronization of scsi_done is not a problem here, because scsi
> >> >> layer
> >> >> use the atomic state, namely SCMD_STATE_COMPLETE, of a scsi cmd to
> >> >> prevent
> >> >> the concurrency of abort and real completion of it.
> >> >>
> >> >> Check func scsi_times_out(), hope it helps.
> >> >>
> >> >> enum blk_eh_timer_return scsi_times_out(struct request *req)
> >> >> {
> >> >> ...
> >> >> if (rtn == BLK_EH_DONE) {
> >> >> /*
> >> >> * Set the command to complete first in order to
> >> >> prevent
> >> >> a real
> >> >> * completion from releasing the command while error
> >> >> handling
> >> >> * is using it. If the command was already completed,
> >> >> then the
> >> >> * lower level driver beat the timeout handler, and it
> >> >> is safe
> >> >> * to return without escalating error recovery.
> >> >> *
> >> >> * If timeout handling lost the race to a real
> >> >> completion, the
> >> >> * block layer may ignore that due to a fake timeout
> >> >> injection,
> >> >> * so return RESET_TIMER to allow error handling
> >> >> another
> >> >> shot
> >> >> * at this command.
> >> >> */
> >> >> if (test_and_set_bit(SCMD_STATE_COMPLETE,
> >> >> &scmd->state))
> >> >> return BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER;
> >> >> if (scsi_abort_command(scmd) != SUCCESS) {
> >> >> set_host_byte(scmd, DID_TIME_OUT);
> >> >> scsi_eh_scmd_add(scmd);
> >> >> }
> >> >> }
> >> >> }
> >> >
> >> > I am familiar with this mechanism. My concern is that both the regular
> >> > completion path and the abort handler must call scsi_dma_unmap() before
> >> > calling cmd->scsi_done(cmd). I don't see how
> >> > test_and_set_bit(SCMD_STATE_COMPLETE, &scmd->state) could prevent that
> >> > the regular completion path and the abort handler call scsi_dma_unmap()
> >> > concurrently since both calls happen before the SCMD_STATE_COMPLETE bit
> >> > is set?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> >
> >> > Bart.
> >>
> >> For scsi_dma_unmap() part, that is true - we should make it serialized
> >> with
> >> any other completion paths. I've found it during my fault injection
> >> test, so
> >> I've made a patch to fix it, but it only comes in my next error
> >> recovery
> >> enhancement patch series. Please check the attachment.
> >>
> >
> > Your patch looks good to me.
> >
> > I have the same idea before but I found that calling scsi_done() (by
> > __ufshcd_transfer_req_compl()) in ufshcd_abort() in old kernel (e.g.,
> > 4.14) will cause issues but it has been resolved by introduced
> > SCMD_STATE_COMPLETE flag in newer kernel. So your patch makes sense.
> >
> > Would you mind sending out this draft patch as a formal patch together
> > with my patch to fix issues in ufshcd_abort()? Our patches are aimed to
> > fix cases that host/device reset eventually not being triggered by the
> > result of ufshcd_abort(), for example, command is aborted successfully
> > or command is not pending in device with its doorbell also cleared.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Stanley Chu
> >
>
> I don't quite actually follow your fix here and I didn't test the
> similar
> fault injection scenario like you do here, so I am not sure if I should
> just absorb your fix into mine. How about I put my fix in my current
> error
> recovery patch series (maybe in next version of it) and you can give
> your
> review. So you can still go with your fix as it is. Mine will be picked
> up
> later by Martin. What do you think?
>
Sure, that's good to me.
Thanks,
Stanley Chu
> Thanks,
>
> Can Guo.
>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Can Guo.
> >>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-03 5:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-24 14:02 [PATCH v4] scsi: ufs: Cleanup completed request without interrupt notification Stanley Chu
2020-07-27 11:18 ` Avri Altman
2020-07-31 1:30 ` Stanley Chu
2020-07-31 4:06 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-07-31 8:00 ` Can Guo
2020-07-31 16:51 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-07-31 23:17 ` Can Guo
2020-08-03 3:00 ` Stanley Chu
2020-08-03 5:14 ` Can Guo
2020-08-03 5:27 ` Stanley Chu [this message]
2020-08-03 3:12 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-08-03 5:07 ` Can Guo
2020-08-04 10:01 ` Can Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1596432475.32283.10.camel@mtkswgap22 \
--to=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
--cc=Avri.Altman@wdc.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=andy.teng@mediatek.com \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=cc.chou@mediatek.com \
--cc=chaotian.jing@mediatek.com \
--cc=chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuohong.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).