From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: frans.klaver@xsens.com (Frans Klaver) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 11:46:20 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 02/16] tty: serial: 8250_core: add run time pm In-Reply-To: <1410377411-26656-3-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de> References: <1410377411-26656-1-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <1410377411-26656-3-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de> Message-ID: <20140929094620.GE13952@ci00147.xsens-tech.local> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 09:29:57PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > +/* > + * This two wrapper ensure, that enable_runtime_pm_tx() can be called more than These two wrappers ensure that enable_runtime_pm_tx() ... > + * once and disable_runtime_pm_tx() will still disable RPM because the fifo is > + * empty and the HW can idle again. > + */ > +static void serial8250_rpm_get_tx(struct uart_8250_port *p) > +{ > + unsigned char rpm_active; > + > + if (!(p->capabilities & UART_CAP_RPM)) > + return; > + > + rpm_active = xchg(&p->rpm_tx_active, 1); > + if (rpm_active) > + return; > + pm_runtime_get_sync(p->port.dev); > +} > + > +static void serial8250_rpm_put_tx(struct uart_8250_port *p) > +{ > + unsigned char rpm_active; > + > + if (!(p->capabilities & UART_CAP_RPM)) > + return; > + > + rpm_active = xchg(&p->rpm_tx_active, 0); > + if (!rpm_active) > + return; > + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(p->port.dev); > + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(p->port.dev); > +} > + > @@ -1469,7 +1531,12 @@ void serial8250_tx_chars(struct uart_8250_port *up) > > DEBUG_INTR("THRE..."); > > - if (uart_circ_empty(xmit)) > + /* > + * With RPM enabled, we have to wait once the FIFO is empty before the s,once,until,? Or do I not understand the sentence correctly? > + * HW can go idle. So we get here once again with empty FIFO and disable > + * the interrupt and RPM in __stop_tx() > + */ > + if (uart_circ_empty(xmit) && !(up->capabilities & UART_CAP_RPM)) > __stop_tx(up); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(serial8250_tx_chars);