linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Cc: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, Grzegorz Jaszczyk <jaz@semihalf.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, mw@semihalf.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: aardvark: fix big endian support
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 16:10:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190715151016.6amymuikizmmmsph@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190715170840.326acd73@windsurf>

On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 05:08:40PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Hello Grzegorz,
> 
> Thanks for this work. I indeed never tested this code on BE platforms,
> and it is very possible that I overlooked endianness issues, so thanks
> for having a look at this and proposing some patches. See some
> questions/comments below.
> 
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 16:15:22 +0200
> Grzegorz Jaszczyk <jaz@semihalf.com> wrote:
> 
> > Initialise every not-byte wide fields of emulated pci bridge config
> > space with proper cpu_to_le* macro. This is required since the structure
> > describing config space of emulated bridge assumes little-endian
> > convention.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Grzegorz Jaszczyk <jaz@semihalf.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/controller/pci-aardvark.c | 10 ++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-aardvark.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-aardvark.c
> > index 134e030..06a12749 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-aardvark.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-aardvark.c
> > @@ -479,8 +479,10 @@ static void advk_sw_pci_bridge_init(struct advk_pcie *pcie)
> >  {
> >  	struct pci_bridge_emul *bridge = &pcie->bridge;
> >  
> > -	bridge->conf.vendor = advk_readl(pcie, PCIE_CORE_DEV_ID_REG) & 0xffff;
> > -	bridge->conf.device = advk_readl(pcie, PCIE_CORE_DEV_ID_REG) >> 16;
> > +	bridge->conf.vendor =
> > +		cpu_to_le16(advk_readl(pcie, PCIE_CORE_DEV_ID_REG) & 0xffff);
> > +	bridge->conf.device =
> > +		cpu_to_le16(advk_readl(pcie, PCIE_CORE_DEV_ID_REG) >> 16);
> >  	bridge->conf.class_revision =
> >  		advk_readl(pcie, PCIE_CORE_DEV_REV_REG) & 0xff;
> 
> So conf.vendor and conf.device and stored as little-endian in the
> emulated config address space, but conf.class_revision is stored in the
> CPU endianness ?
> 
> >  
> > @@ -489,8 +491,8 @@ static void advk_sw_pci_bridge_init(struct advk_pcie *pcie)
> >  	bridge->conf.iolimit = PCI_IO_RANGE_TYPE_32;
> 
> >  
> >  	/* Support 64 bits memory pref */
> > -	bridge->conf.pref_mem_base = PCI_PREF_RANGE_TYPE_64;
> > -	bridge->conf.pref_mem_limit = PCI_PREF_RANGE_TYPE_64;
> > +	bridge->conf.pref_mem_base = cpu_to_le16(PCI_PREF_RANGE_TYPE_64);
> > +	bridge->conf.pref_mem_limit = cpu_to_le16(PCI_PREF_RANGE_TYPE_64);
> 
> Same here: why are conf.pref_mem_{base,limit} converted to LE, but not
> conf.iolimit ?
> 
> Also, the advk_pci_bridge_emul_pcie_conf_read() and
> advk_pci_bridge_emul_pcie_conf_write() return values that are in the
> CPU endianness.
> 
> Am I missing something ?

Getting the types correct and then using Sparse to validate the code
will help to identify issues exactly like this.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-15 15:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-15 14:15 [PATCH] PCI: aardvark: fix big endian support Grzegorz Jaszczyk
2019-07-15 15:08 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2019-07-15 15:10   ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2019-07-16  6:32     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2019-07-16  8:56       ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-07-16  8:31   ` Grzegorz Jaszczyk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190715151016.6amymuikizmmmsph@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=jaz@semihalf.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=mw@semihalf.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).