[PATCH 05/50] arm: Add loglvl to unwind_backtrace()

[Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>]

Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on
a platform or user).

Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages.
And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs,
but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk()
was deferred.

Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems
an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers.
Also, it will consolidate printings with headers.

Add log level argument to unwind_backtrace() as a preparation for
introducing show_stack_loglvl().

As a good side-effect arm_syscall() is now printing errors with the same
log level as the backtrace.

Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
---
 arch/arm/include/asm/unwind.h | 3 ++-
 arch/arm/kernel/traps.c       | 6 +++---
 arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c      | 7 ++++---
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/unwind.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/unwind.h
index 6e282c33126b..0f8a3439902d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/unwind.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/unwind.h
@@ -36,7 +36,8 @@ extern struct unwind_table *unwind_table_add(unsigned long start,
 					     unsigned long text_addr,
 					     unsigned long text_size);
 extern void unwind_table_del(struct unwind_table *tab);
-extern void unwind_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk);
+extern void unwind_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk,
+			     const char *loglvl);
 
 #endif	/* !__ASSEMBLY__ */
 
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
index 7c3f32b26585..69e35462c9e9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ static void dump_instr(const char *lvl, struct pt_regs *regs)
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND
 static inline void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
-	unwind_backtrace(regs, tsk);
+	unwind_backtrace(regs, tsk, KERN_DEBUG);
 }
 #else
 static void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
@@ -660,10 +660,10 @@ asmlinkage int arm_syscall(int no, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	if (user_debug & UDBG_SYSCALL) {
 		pr_err("[%d] %s: arm syscall %d\n",
 		       task_pid_nr(current), current->comm, no);
-		dump_instr("", regs);
+		dump_instr(KERN_ERR, regs);
 		if (user_mode(regs)) {
 			__show_regs(regs);
-			c_backtrace(frame_pointer(regs), processor_mode(regs), NULL);
+			c_backtrace(frame_pointer(regs), processor_mode(regs), KERN_ERR);
 		}
 	}
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c b/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c
index 0a65005e10f0..caaae1b6f721 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c
@@ -455,11 +455,12 @@ int unwind_frame(struct stackframe *frame)
 	return URC_OK;
 }
 
-void unwind_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
+void unwind_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk,
+		      const char *loglvl)
 {
 	struct stackframe frame;
 
-	pr_debug("%s(regs = %p tsk = %p)\n", __func__, regs, tsk);
+	printk("%s%s(regs = %p tsk = %p)\n", loglvl, __func__, regs, tsk);
 
 	if (!tsk)
 		tsk = current;
@@ -493,7 +494,7 @@ void unwind_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
 		urc = unwind_frame(&frame);
 		if (urc < 0)
 			break;
-		dump_backtrace_entry(where, frame.pc, frame.sp - 4, NULL);
+		dump_backtrace_entry(where, frame.pc, frame.sp - 4, loglvl);
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.23.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel