From: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, shan.gavin@gmail.com,
sudeep.holla@arm.com, robin.murphy@arm.com
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/4] arm64: Declare ACPI parking protocol CPU operation if needed
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:01:42 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200318230145.72097-2-gshan@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200318230145.72097-1-gshan@redhat.com>
It's obvious we needn't declare the corresponding CPU operation when
CONFIG_ARM64_ACPI_PARKING_PROTOCOL is disabled, even it doesn't cause
any compiling warnings.
Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c
index 7e07072757af..2082cfb1be86 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_ops.c
@@ -15,7 +15,9 @@
#include <asm/smp_plat.h>
extern const struct cpu_operations smp_spin_table_ops;
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ACPI_PARKING_PROTOCOL
extern const struct cpu_operations acpi_parking_protocol_ops;
+#endif
extern const struct cpu_operations cpu_psci_ops;
const struct cpu_operations *cpu_ops[NR_CPUS] __ro_after_init;
--
2.23.0
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-18 23:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-18 23:01 [PATCH v5 0/4] arm64: Dereference CPU operations indirectly Gavin Shan
2020-03-18 23:01 ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2020-03-18 23:01 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] arm64: Rename cpu_read_ops() to init_cpu_ops() Gavin Shan
2020-03-18 23:01 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] arm64: Introduce get_cpu_ops() helper function Gavin Shan
2020-03-19 19:31 ` Mark Rutland
2020-03-18 23:01 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] arm64: Remove CPU operations dereferencing array Gavin Shan
2020-03-19 19:38 ` Mark Rutland
2020-03-19 22:54 ` Gavin Shan
2020-03-24 17:29 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] arm64: Dereference CPU operations indirectly Catalin Marinas
2020-03-25 11:49 ` Gavin Shan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200318230145.72097-2-gshan@redhat.com \
--to=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shan.gavin@gmail.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).