linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
To: Alain Volmat <alain.volmat@st.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	alexandre.torgue@st.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	pierre-yves.mordret@st.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com,
	fabrice.gasnier@st.com, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] i2c: smbus: add core function handling SMBus host-notify
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 12:49:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200701104946.GH2261@ninjato> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1593070769-9106-2-git-send-email-alain.volmat@st.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4192 bytes --]

On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 09:39:26AM +0200, Alain Volmat wrote:
> SMBus Host-Notify protocol, from the adapter point of view
> consist of receiving a message from a client, including the
> client address and some other data.
> 
> It can be simply handled by creating a new slave device
> and registering a callback performing the parsing of the
> message received from the client.
> 
> This commit introduces two new core functions
>   * i2c_new_smbus_host_notify_device
>   * i2c_free_smbus_host_notify_device
> that take care of registration of the new slave device and
> callback and will call i2c_handle_smbus_host_notify once a
> Host-Notify event is received.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alain Volmat <alain.volmat@st.com>
> ---
> v2: remove useless dev_err message in case of hnotify handling error
>     prevent handling hnotify in case of a incomplete write

Okay, now I got it to work, I also noted a few more issues.

First, I'd suggest s/i2c_smbus_host_notify/i2c_slave_host_notify/g for
all occurences in this patch. This makes a stronger distinction between
the generic HostNotify support and the slave specific one.

Also, I wonder if this shouldn't go to i2c-smbus.c instead but I haven't
checked if we end up in dependency hell then. Second best thought: at
least move to i2c-core-slave.c, then we could save the #ifdeffery in the
c-file?

> 
>  drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/i2c-smbus.h    |   2 +
>  2 files changed, 112 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c
> index 56bb840142e3..3a37664fb5f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c
> @@ -708,3 +708,113 @@ int of_i2c_setup_smbus_alert(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_i2c_setup_smbus_alert);
>  #endif
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C_SLAVE)
> +struct i2c_smbus_host_notify_status {
> +	bool notify_start;
> +	u8 addr;
> +};
> +
> +static int i2c_smbus_host_notify_cb(struct i2c_client *client,
> +				    enum i2c_slave_event event, u8 *val)
> +{
> +	struct i2c_smbus_host_notify_status *status = client->dev.platform_data;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	switch (event) {
> +	case I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED:
> +		status->notify_start = true;
> +		break;
> +	case I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_RECEIVED:
> +		/* We only retrieve the first byte received (addr)
> +		 * since there is currently no support to retrieve the data
> +		 * parameter from the client.
> +		 */
> +		if (!status->notify_start)
> +			break;
> +		status->addr = *val;
> +		status->notify_start = false;

So, we are safe if the message is too short. Otherwise, we capture the
first byte (== address) only, right. Further bytes until STOP are
discarded. So, we don't check if the message is too long and contains
more than the status word. Maybe we should add that?

> +		break;
> +	case I2C_SLAVE_STOP:
> +		/* In case of incomplete write, don't handle host-notify */
> +		if (status->notify_start) {
> +			status->notify_start = false;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		ret = i2c_handle_smbus_host_notify(client->adapter,
> +						   status->addr);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			return ret;
> +		break;
> +	default:

The missing cases are mandatory. From my testunit driver:

        case I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED:
        case I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED:
                *val = 0xff;
                break;

> +		/* Only handle necessary events */
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +

...

> --- a/include/linux/i2c-smbus.h
> +++ b/include/linux/i2c-smbus.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ static inline int of_i2c_setup_smbus_alert(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  #endif
> +struct i2c_client *i2c_new_smbus_host_notify_device(struct i2c_adapter *adapter);
> +void i2c_free_smbus_host_notify_device(struct i2c_client *client);

Those need to be guarded with I2C_SLAVE as well. And an #else branch
with empty/successful placeholders.

>  
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C_SMBUS) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMI)
>  void i2c_register_spd(struct i2c_adapter *adap);
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-01 10:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-25  7:39 [PATCH v2 0/4] stm32-f7: Addition of SMBus Alert / Host-notify features Alain Volmat
2020-06-25  7:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] i2c: smbus: add core function handling SMBus host-notify Alain Volmat
2020-07-01 10:49   ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2020-07-02 11:23     ` Alain Volmat
2020-06-25  7:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] i2c: addition of client hnotify reg/unreg callbacks Alain Volmat
2020-06-25  7:39 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] dt-bindings: i2c-stm32: add SMBus Alert bindings Alain Volmat
2020-06-30 19:41   ` Wolfram Sang
2020-07-14  2:30     ` Rob Herring
2020-07-21  6:22       ` Wolfram Sang
2020-06-25  7:39 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] i2c: stm32f7: Add SMBus-specific protocols support Alain Volmat
2020-06-30 16:05 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] stm32-f7: Addition of SMBus Alert / Host-notify features Wolfram Sang
2020-07-01  9:21   ` Alain Volmat
2020-07-01  9:28     ` Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200701104946.GH2261@ninjato \
    --to=wsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=alain.volmat@st.com \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=fabrice.gasnier@st.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=pierre-yves.mordret@st.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).