From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mingo@redhat.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] cpufreq: set invariance scale factor on transition end
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:43:34 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200730041334.cjg5mc5xpopd2lst@vireshk-mac-ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200722093732.14297-3-ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
On 22-07-20, 10:37, Ionela Voinescu wrote:
> While the move of the invariance setter calls (arch_set_freq_scale())
> from cpufreq drivers to cpufreq core maintained the previous
> functionality for existing drivers that use target_index() and
> fast_switch() for frequency switching, it also gives the possibility
> of adding support for users of the target() callback, which is exploited
> here.
>
> To be noted that the target() callback has been flagged as deprecated
> since:
>
> commit 9c0ebcf78fde ("cpufreq: Implement light weight ->target_index() routine")
>
> It also doesn't have that many users:
>
> cpufreq-nforce2.c:371:2: .target = nforce2_target,
> cppc_cpufreq.c:416:2: .target = cppc_cpufreq_set_target,
> gx-suspmod.c:439:2: .target = cpufreq_gx_target,
> pcc-cpufreq.c:573:2: .target = pcc_cpufreq_target,
>
> Similarly to the path taken for target_index() calls in the cpufreq core
> during a frequency change, all of the drivers above will mark the end of a
> frequency change by a call to cpufreq_freq_transition_end().
>
> Therefore, cpufreq_freq_transition_end() can be used as the location for
> the arch_set_freq_scale() call to potentially inform the scheduler of the
> frequency change.
>
> This change maintains the previous functionality for the drivers that
> implement the target_index() callback, while also adding support for the
> few drivers that implement the deprecated target() callback.
>
> Two notes are worthwhile here:
> - In __target_index(), cpufreq_freq_transition_end() is called only for
> drivers that have synchronous notifications enabled. There is only one
> driver that disables them,
>
> drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c:1142: .flags = CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION,
>
> which is deprecated.
I don't think this is deprecated.
--
viresh
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-30 4:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-22 9:37 [PATCH v2 0/7] cpufreq: improve frequency invariance support Ionela Voinescu
2020-07-22 9:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] cpufreq: move invariance setter calls in cpufreq core Ionela Voinescu
2020-07-27 13:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-29 9:03 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-07-30 3:41 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-08-03 13:26 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-08-03 13:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-08-03 14:16 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-07-22 9:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] cpufreq: set invariance scale factor on transition end Ionela Voinescu
2020-07-27 13:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-29 9:14 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-07-30 4:13 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2020-08-03 13:58 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-08-04 6:26 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-08-05 10:35 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-07-22 9:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] arch_topology: disable frequency invariance for CONFIG_BL_SWITCHER Ionela Voinescu
2020-07-30 4:24 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-30 10:29 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-07-31 15:48 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-08-03 14:39 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-08-04 6:30 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-08-10 9:01 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-07-22 9:37 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] cpufreq: report whether cpufreq supports Frequency Invariance (FI) Ionela Voinescu
2020-07-27 14:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-29 14:39 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-07-30 4:43 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-08-03 15:24 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-08-04 6:46 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-08-05 10:35 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-07-22 9:37 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] arch_topology, cpufreq, sched/core: constify arch_* cpumasks Ionela Voinescu
2020-07-30 11:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-07-22 9:37 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] arch_topology, arm, arm64: define arch_scale_freq_invariant() Ionela Voinescu
2020-07-30 11:44 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] arch_topology,arm,arm64: " Catalin Marinas
2020-07-22 9:37 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] cpufreq: make schedutil the default for arm and arm64 Ionela Voinescu
2020-07-30 4:54 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200730041334.cjg5mc5xpopd2lst@vireshk-mac-ubuntu \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).