linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Simon South <simon@simonsouth.net>
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, heiko@sntech.de,
	bbrezillon@kernel.org, lee.jones@linaro.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, thierry.reding@gmail.com,
	tpiepho@gmail.com, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] pwm: rockchip: rockchip_pwm_probe(): Remove superfluous clk_unprepare()
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 08:31:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210113073125.tmrdy4g3eanwib5y@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fe86b3ad145c5df3b16b09a83769f078bb4a9d1f.1608735481.git.simon@simonsouth.net>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 630 bytes --]

Hello Simon,

On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 11:01:04AM -0500, Simon South wrote:
> If rockchip_pwm_probe() fails to register a PWM device it calls
> clk_unprepare() for the device's PWM clock, without having first disabled
> the clock and before jumping to an error handler that also unprepares
> it.

The "without having first disabled the clock" part is wrong without the
first patch. I suggest to swap the order of the first and second patch.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-13  7:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-23 16:01 [PATCH v3 0/7] pwm: rockchip: Eliminate potential race condition when probing Simon South
2020-12-23 16:01 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] pwm: rockchip: Enable APB clock during register access while probing Simon South
2021-01-13  7:23   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-12-23 16:01 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] pwm: rockchip: rockchip_pwm_probe(): Remove superfluous clk_unprepare() Simon South
2021-01-13  7:31   ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2020-12-23 16:01 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] pwm: rockchip: Replace "bus clk" with "PWM clk" Simon South
2021-01-13  7:33   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-12-23 16:01 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] pwm: rockchip: Eliminate potential race condition when probing Simon South
2021-01-13  7:37   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-12-23 16:01 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] pwm: rockchip: rockchip_pwm_probe(): Remove unneeded goto target Simon South
2021-01-13  7:38   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-12-23 16:01 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] pwm: rockchip: Enable PWM clock of probed device only if running Simon South
2021-01-13  7:50   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-01-14 15:22     ` Simon South
2020-12-23 16:01 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] pwm: rockchip: Enable clock before calling clk_get_rate() Simon South
2021-01-13  7:54   ` Uwe Kleine-König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210113073125.tmrdy4g3eanwib5y@pengutronix.de \
    --to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=bbrezillon@kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=simon@simonsouth.net \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=tpiepho@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).