linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Document requirements for fine grained traps at boot
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 11:31:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210329103126.GE3207@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210326115541.GC5126@arm.com>

On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:55:41AM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 03:49:17PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > The arm64 FEAT_FGT extension introduces a set of traps to EL2 for accesses
> > to small sets of registers and instructions from EL1 and EL0.  Currently
> > Linux makes no use of this feature, explicitly document that it should
> > be disabled when entering the kernel at EL2 (as is the architectural
> > default) to help avoid surprises.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/arm64/booting.rst | 7 +++++++
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/booting.rst b/Documentation/arm64/booting.rst
> > index 7552dbc1cc54..1efc2d3023bb 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/arm64/booting.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/arm64/booting.rst
> > @@ -270,6 +270,13 @@ Before jumping into the kernel, the following conditions must be met:
> >        having 0b1 set for the corresponding bit for each of the auxiliary
> >        counters present.
> >  
> > +  For CPUs with Fine Grained Traps (FEAT_FGT) extension present:
> > +
> > +  - If the kernel is entered at EL2:
> > +
> > +    - HAFGRTR_EL2, HDFGWTR_EL2, HDFGRTR_EL2, HFGWTR_EL2, HFGRTR_EL2 and
> > +      HFGITR_EL2 must be initialised to 0.
> 
> While this requirement is correct, documenting such individual registers
> doesn't scales well. You may run a 5 year old kernel on a newer CPU and
> we can't predict which control registers have been added and what
> side-effect they have. The architecture, at least for the above
> registers, states that if warm reset to EL2, their value is 0. I think
> the EL3 firmware (which is normally up to date with the CPU it is
> running on) should follow the ARM ARM reset values. There are probably
> EL1 registers with similar requirements (I haven't checked).

One thing I don't understand about the registers listed here is that we're
requiring firmware to initialise them when the kernel is entered at EL2. But
they're *_EL2 registers, so why can't the kernel initialise them itself? The
fewer dependencies on firmware, the better.

Will

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-29 21:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-12 15:49 [PATCH] arm64: Document requirements for fine grained traps at boot Mark Brown
2021-03-26 11:55 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-03-29 10:31   ` Will Deacon [this message]
2021-03-29 12:16     ` Catalin Marinas
2021-03-29 12:25     ` Mark Brown
2021-03-29 17:06   ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210329103126.GE3207@willie-the-truck \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).