On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 04:40:24PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 03:46:20PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > -		if (system_supports_bti() &&
> > +		if (system_supports_bti() && is_interp &&

> Won't this cause BTI to be forced off for static binaries?

> Perhaps this should be (has_interp == is_interp), as for
> arch_elf_adjust_prot().  Seems gross though, since has_interp would
> become useless after the next patch.  If there's no sensible way to
> keep this bisectable, perhaps the patches can be merged instead.

Ugh, right.  I only tested the finished result.