From: madvenka@linux.microsoft.com
To: mark.rutland@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com,
ardb@kernel.org, nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com,
sjitindarsingh@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
will@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com,
jthierry@redhat.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
madvenka@linux.microsoft.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH v8 1/4] arm64: Make all stack walking functions use arch_stack_walk()
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 14:06:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210812190603.25326-2-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210812190603.25326-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
Currently, there are multiple functions in ARM64 code that walk the
stack using start_backtrace() and unwind_frame(). Convert all of
them to use arch_stack_walk(). This makes maintenance easier.
Here is the list of functions:
perf_callchain_kernel()
get_wchan()
return_address()
dump_backtrace()
profile_pc()
Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h | 3 ---
arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c | 5 +---
arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c | 6 +----
arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 38 +++-------------------------
arch/arm64/kernel/time.c | 22 +++++++++-------
6 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
index 8aebc00c1718..e43dea1c6b41 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
@@ -61,9 +61,6 @@ struct stackframe {
#endif
};
-extern int unwind_frame(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame);
-extern void walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame,
- bool (*fn)(void *, unsigned long), void *data);
extern void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk,
const char *loglvl);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c
index 4a72c2727309..2f289013c9c9 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c
@@ -147,15 +147,12 @@ static bool callchain_trace(void *data, unsigned long pc)
void perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- struct stackframe frame;
-
if (perf_guest_cbs && perf_guest_cbs->is_in_guest()) {
/* We don't support guest os callchain now */
return;
}
- start_backtrace(&frame, regs->regs[29], regs->pc);
- walk_stackframe(current, &frame, callchain_trace, entry);
+ arch_stack_walk(callchain_trace, entry, current, regs);
}
unsigned long perf_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
index c8989b999250..52c12fd26407 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
@@ -544,11 +544,28 @@ __notrace_funcgraph struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct *prev,
return last;
}
+struct wchan_info {
+ unsigned long pc;
+ int count;
+};
+
+static bool get_wchan_cb(void *arg, unsigned long pc)
+{
+ struct wchan_info *wchan_info = arg;
+
+ if (!in_sched_functions(pc)) {
+ wchan_info->pc = pc;
+ return false;
+ }
+ wchan_info->count--;
+ return !!wchan_info->count;
+}
+
unsigned long get_wchan(struct task_struct *p)
{
- struct stackframe frame;
- unsigned long stack_page, ret = 0;
- int count = 0;
+ unsigned long stack_page;
+ struct wchan_info wchan_info;
+
if (!p || p == current || task_is_running(p))
return 0;
@@ -556,20 +573,12 @@ unsigned long get_wchan(struct task_struct *p)
if (!stack_page)
return 0;
- start_backtrace(&frame, thread_saved_fp(p), thread_saved_pc(p));
+ wchan_info.pc = 0;
+ wchan_info.count = 16;
+ arch_stack_walk(get_wchan_cb, &wchan_info, p, NULL);
- do {
- if (unwind_frame(p, &frame))
- goto out;
- if (!in_sched_functions(frame.pc)) {
- ret = frame.pc;
- goto out;
- }
- } while (count++ < 16);
-
-out:
put_task_stack(p);
- return ret;
+ return wchan_info.pc;
}
unsigned long arch_align_stack(unsigned long sp)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c
index a6d18755652f..92a0f4d434e4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c
@@ -35,15 +35,11 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(save_return_addr);
void *return_address(unsigned int level)
{
struct return_address_data data;
- struct stackframe frame;
data.level = level + 2;
data.addr = NULL;
- start_backtrace(&frame,
- (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(0),
- (unsigned long)return_address);
- walk_stackframe(current, &frame, save_return_addr, &data);
+ arch_stack_walk(save_return_addr, &data, current, NULL);
if (!data.level)
return data.addr;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
index 8982a2b78acf..1800310f92be 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -151,23 +151,21 @@ void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame,
}
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(walk_stackframe);
-static void dump_backtrace_entry(unsigned long where, const char *loglvl)
+static bool dump_backtrace_entry(void *arg, unsigned long where)
{
+ char *loglvl = arg;
printk("%s %pSb\n", loglvl, (void *)where);
+ return true;
}
void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk,
const char *loglvl)
{
- struct stackframe frame;
- int skip = 0;
-
pr_debug("%s(regs = %p tsk = %p)\n", __func__, regs, tsk);
if (regs) {
if (user_mode(regs))
return;
- skip = 1;
}
if (!tsk)
@@ -176,36 +174,8 @@ void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk,
if (!try_get_task_stack(tsk))
return;
- if (tsk == current) {
- start_backtrace(&frame,
- (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(0),
- (unsigned long)dump_backtrace);
- } else {
- /*
- * task blocked in __switch_to
- */
- start_backtrace(&frame,
- thread_saved_fp(tsk),
- thread_saved_pc(tsk));
- }
-
printk("%sCall trace:\n", loglvl);
- do {
- /* skip until specified stack frame */
- if (!skip) {
- dump_backtrace_entry(frame.pc, loglvl);
- } else if (frame.fp == regs->regs[29]) {
- skip = 0;
- /*
- * Mostly, this is the case where this function is
- * called in panic/abort. As exception handler's
- * stack frame does not contain the corresponding pc
- * at which an exception has taken place, use regs->pc
- * instead.
- */
- dump_backtrace_entry(regs->pc, loglvl);
- }
- } while (!unwind_frame(tsk, &frame));
+ arch_stack_walk(dump_backtrace_entry, (void *)loglvl, tsk, regs);
put_task_stack(tsk);
}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c
index eebbc8d7123e..671b3038a772 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c
@@ -32,22 +32,26 @@
#include <asm/stacktrace.h>
#include <asm/paravirt.h>
+static bool profile_pc_cb(void *arg, unsigned long pc)
+{
+ unsigned long *prof_pc = arg;
+
+ if (in_lock_functions(pc))
+ return true;
+ *prof_pc = pc;
+ return false;
+}
+
unsigned long profile_pc(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- struct stackframe frame;
+ unsigned long prof_pc = 0;
if (!in_lock_functions(regs->pc))
return regs->pc;
- start_backtrace(&frame, regs->regs[29], regs->pc);
-
- do {
- int ret = unwind_frame(NULL, &frame);
- if (ret < 0)
- return 0;
- } while (in_lock_functions(frame.pc));
+ arch_stack_walk(profile_pc_cb, &prof_pc, current, regs);
- return frame.pc;
+ return prof_pc;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(profile_pc);
--
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-12 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <b45aac2843f16ca759e065ea547ab0afff8c0f01>
2021-08-12 19:05 ` [RFC PATCH v8 0/4] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement stack trace reliability checks madvenka
2021-08-12 19:06 ` madvenka [this message]
2021-08-24 13:13 ` [RFC PATCH v8 1/4] arm64: Make all stack walking functions use arch_stack_walk() Mark Rutland
2021-08-24 17:21 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-08-24 17:38 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-08-24 17:38 ` Mark Brown
2021-08-24 17:40 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-08-26 4:52 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-10-09 23:41 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-08-12 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v8 2/4] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder code for better consistency and maintenance madvenka
2021-08-26 15:46 ` Mark Brown
2021-08-26 23:19 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-09-01 16:20 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-02 7:10 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-08-12 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v8 3/4] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder madvenka
2021-08-24 5:55 ` nobuta.keiya
2021-08-24 12:19 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-08-25 0:01 ` nobuta.keiya
2021-08-26 15:57 ` Mark Brown
2021-08-26 23:31 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-08-12 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v8 4/4] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list madvenka
2021-08-12 19:17 ` [RFC PATCH v8 0/4] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement stack trace reliability checks Madhavan T. Venkataraman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210812190603.25326-2-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=jthierry@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=sjitindarsingh@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).