From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAA45C4338F for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 12:32:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FB4F6137D for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 12:32:58 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 8FB4F6137D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=l6V+GvIBGRtFAxBLCeaPWn/OHAKbGCncCECGd8aM5cs=; b=BWwsXFTD//1sZo 6kA2p3wkqWgg7s7ffYycpnfoFL+bJW9AQfG3OusMw8PdaLnCZGL8ZG+bliP4aZ3HhuDWWrond9JHj r0slFQfdx3a5iamQKwP1zWksV7GNqCc+fITyqiMdyzW2ZkwRfzDc/3EzL1bGcS8iBRZLPtWnOE6ai FD0CxgHFrYViSv4YOjPWvC5LzE4aKpjQ5NTmAs/fvBH7cQMEG7rZ4VTd3Cf3fizFuyENhg4Xj8WqM wHQqnUc4ryZos6DdDnImtKhzaTj1wXdBO78EHDbFmsNMskMVBUoDc8LTonFLGq0LtMB46/7nDwyO7 5fSlSKl+7CrzdN+lIlzA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mI96T-00Gmbp-Pa; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 12:31:01 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mI96P-00GmbM-NA for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 12:30:59 +0000 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A53A76138B; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 12:30:55 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 13:30:52 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Lorenzo Pieralisi Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hanjun Guo , Ard Biesheuvel , Will Deacon , Sudeep Holla , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Veronika kabatova , Robin Murphy Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3] ACPI: Add memory semantics to acpi_os_map_memory() Message-ID: <20210823123052.GC8603@arm.com> References: <20210802152359.12623-1-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> <20210823104618.14552-1-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210823104618.14552-1-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210823_053057_817696_F53A7588 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.27 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 11:46:18AM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > The memory attributes attached to memory regions depend on architecture > specific mappings. > > For some memory regions, the attributes specified by firmware (eg > uncached) are not sufficient to determine how a memory region should be > mapped by an OS (for instance a region that is define as uncached in > firmware can be mapped as Normal or Device memory on arm64) and > therefore the OS must be given control on how to map the region to match > the expected mapping behaviour (eg if a mapping is requested with memory > semantics, it must allow unaligned accesses). > > Rework acpi_os_map_memory() and acpi_os_ioremap() back-end to split > them into two separate code paths: > > acpi_os_memmap() -> memory semantics > acpi_os_ioremap() -> MMIO semantics > > The split allows the architectural implementation back-ends to detect > the default memory attributes required by the mapping in question > (ie the mapping API defines the semantics memory vs MMIO) and map the > memory accordingly. > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/31ffe8fc-f5ee-2858-26c5-0fd8bdd68702@arm.com > Tested-by: Hanjun Guo > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi > Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel > Cc: Ard Biesheuvel > Cc: Will Deacon > Cc: Hanjun Guo > Cc: Sudeep Holla > Cc: Catalin Marinas > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" > --- > Resending with all lists CC'ed. > > Patch series is a v3 of a previous version[2]: > > v2->v3: > - Dropped first two-patches following LKML feedback[2] > v1->v2 > - Added patch 1 and 2 according to feedback received on[1] > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20210726100026.12538-1-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20210802152359.12623-1-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com > > arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h | 3 +++ > arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++--- > drivers/acpi/osl.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++------- > include/acpi/acpi_io.h | 8 ++++++++ > 4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) For arm64: Acked-by: Catalin Marinas I presume this patch would go in via the acpi tree. -- Catalin _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel