linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH] iommu: fix ARM_SMMU vs QCOM_SCM compilation
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2021 05:33:50 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211010023350.978638-1-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> (raw)

After commit 424953cf3c66 ("qcom_scm: hide Kconfig symbol") arm-smmu got
qcom_smmu_impl_init() call guarded by IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_QCOM).
However the CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_QCOM Kconfig entry does not exist, so the
qcom_smmu_impl_init() is never called.

So, let's fix this by always calling qcom_smmu_impl_init(). It does not
touch the smmu passed unless the device is a non-Qualcomm one. Make
ARM_SMMU select QCOM_SCM for ARCH_QCOM.

Fixes: 424953cf3c66 ("qcom_scm: hide Kconfig symbol")
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reported-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/iommu/Kconfig                      | 1 +
 drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/Makefile        | 3 +--
 drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-impl.c | 9 +++++++--
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
index c5c71b7ab7e8..a4593e53fe7d 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
@@ -309,6 +309,7 @@ config ARM_SMMU
 	tristate "ARM Ltd. System MMU (SMMU) Support"
 	depends on ARM64 || ARM || (COMPILE_TEST && !GENERIC_ATOMIC64)
 	select IOMMU_API
+	select QCOM_SCM
 	select IOMMU_IO_PGTABLE_LPAE
 	select ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU if ARM
 	help
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/Makefile b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/Makefile
index b0cc01aa20c9..e240a7bcf310 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/Makefile
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
 # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_IOMMU) += qcom_iommu.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_SMMU) += arm_smmu.o
-arm_smmu-objs += arm-smmu.o arm-smmu-impl.o arm-smmu-nvidia.o
-arm_smmu-$(CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_QCOM) += arm-smmu-qcom.o
+arm_smmu-objs += arm-smmu.o arm-smmu-impl.o arm-smmu-nvidia.o arm-smmu-qcom.o
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-impl.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-impl.c
index 2c25cce38060..8199185dd262 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-impl.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-impl.c
@@ -215,8 +215,13 @@ struct arm_smmu_device *arm_smmu_impl_init(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
 	    of_device_is_compatible(np, "nvidia,tegra186-smmu"))
 		return nvidia_smmu_impl_init(smmu);
 
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_QCOM))
-		smmu = qcom_smmu_impl_init(smmu);
+	/*
+	 * qcom_smmu_impl_init() will not touch smmu if the device is not
+	 * a Qualcomm one.
+	 */
+	smmu = qcom_smmu_impl_init(smmu);
+	if (IS_ERR(smmu))
+		return smmu;
 
 	if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "marvell,ap806-smmu-500"))
 		smmu->impl = &mrvl_mmu500_impl;
-- 
2.30.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

             reply	other threads:[~2021-10-10  2:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-10  2:33 Dmitry Baryshkov [this message]
2021-10-10  4:16 ` [PATCH] iommu: fix ARM_SMMU vs QCOM_SCM compilation Bjorn Andersson
2021-10-10 17:42   ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-10-11  4:06     ` Steev Klimaszewski
2021-10-11  4:11     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-10-11  6:08       ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-10-11  9:09         ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-10-11  9:56           ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-10-12  3:34             ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-10-12  3:35     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-10-10  4:34 ` Steev Klimaszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211010023350.978638-1-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --to=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=treding@nvidia.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).