From: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Cc: macromorgan@hotmail.com, vigneshr@ti.com, jaimeliao@mxic.com.tw,
richard@nod.at, esben@geanix.com, linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk,
knaerzche@gmail.com, michael@walle.cc,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, code@reto-schneider.ch,
miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, heiko.thiery@gmail.com, sr@denx.de,
figgyc@figgyc.uk, mail@david-bauer.net, zhengxunli@mxic.com.tw
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/14] mtd: spi-nor: core: Init all flash parameters based on SFDP where possible
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 17:52:46 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211206122244.in6pzwjnxxo7yd32@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211203142256.47370-10-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
On 03/12/21 04:22PM, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> New flash additions that support SFDP should be declared with
> PARSE_SFDP and with all the other flags that are not SFDP
> discoverable.
>
> Keep the old way of initializing the flash, until all the flashes
> are converted to use either PARSE_SFDP or SPI_NOR_SKIP_SFDP.
>
> Flashes that declare PARSE_SFDP do not have a roll-back mechanism
> because if spi_nor_parse_sfdp() returns an error it means that either
> BFPT is not supported, thus SFDP is not supported and the user didn't
> correctly declared the flash_info entry, or some memalloc failed.
> Either way we should return an error. The rest of the SFDP tables are
> optional, if one of the optional SFDP tables fails, we just continue.
> We would like to get rid of the default_init() hook, so the
> spi_nor_manufacturer_init_params() is not called in the new sequnce
> of flash initialization that is based solely on SFDP.
>
> Split spi_nor_info_init_params() in spi_nor_init_default_params()
> and spi_nor_no_sfdp_init_params(). spi_nor_init_default_params() is
> called for all the flashes regardless if they support SFDP or not.
> spi_nor_no_sfdp_init_params() is called just for the flashes that
> do not define SFDP and initializes parameters and setting solely
> based on flash_info data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c | 194 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 116 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> index 86bbd1ca22fc..d5eaf9a705ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> @@ -2509,74 +2509,21 @@ static void spi_nor_manufacturer_init_params(struct spi_nor *nor)
> }
>
> /**
> - * spi_nor_sfdp_init_params() - Initialize the flash's parameters and settings
> - * based on JESD216 SFDP standard.
> + * spi_nor_no_sfdp_init_params() - Initialize the flash's parameters and
> + * settings based on nor->info->sfdp_flags. This method should be called only by
> + * flashes that do not define SFDP tables. If the flash supports SFDP but the
> + * information is wrong and the settings from this function can not be retrieved
> + * by parsing SFDP, one should instead use the fixup hooks and update the wrong
s/fixup hooks/fixup flags/ ?
> + * bits.
> * @nor: pointer to a 'struct spi_nor'.
> - *
> - * The method has a roll-back mechanism: in case the SFDP parsing fails, the
> - * legacy flash parameters and settings will be restored.
> */
> -static void spi_nor_sfdp_init_params(struct spi_nor *nor)
> -{
> - struct spi_nor_flash_parameter sfdp_params;
> -
> - memcpy(&sfdp_params, nor->params, sizeof(sfdp_params));
> -
> - if (spi_nor_parse_sfdp(nor)) {
> - memcpy(nor->params, &sfdp_params, sizeof(*nor->params));
> - nor->addr_width = 0;
> - nor->flags &= ~SNOR_F_4B_OPCODES;
> - }
> -}
[...]
> +
> +/**
> + * spi_nor_init_params_deprecated() - Deprecated way of initializing flash
> + * parameters and settings.
> + * @nor: pointer to a 'struct spi_nor'.
> + *
> + * The method assumes that flash doesn't support SFDP so it initializes flash
> + * parameters in spi_nor_no_sfdp_init_params() which later on can be overwritten
> + * when parsing SFDP, if supported.
> + */
> +static void spi_nor_init_params_deprecated(struct spi_nor *nor)
> +{
> + spi_nor_no_sfdp_init_params(nor);
> +
> + spi_nor_manufacturer_init_params(nor);
> +
> + if ((SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ | SPI_NOR_OCTAL_READ |
> + SPI_NOR_OCTAL_DTR_READ) &&
> + !(nor->info->no_sfdp_flags & SPI_NOR_SKIP_SFDP))
> + spi_nor_sfdp_init_params_deprecated(nor);
> +}
> +
[...]
> @@ -2773,24 +2807,28 @@ static void spi_nor_late_init_params(struct spi_nor *nor)
> * parameters that are not declared in the JESD216 SFDP standard, or where SFDP
> * tables are not defined at all.
> * spi_nor_late_init_params()
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, -errno otherwise.
> */
> static int spi_nor_init_params(struct spi_nor *nor)
> {
> + int ret;
> +
> nor->params = devm_kzalloc(nor->dev, sizeof(*nor->params), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!nor->params)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - spi_nor_info_init_params(nor);
> -
> - spi_nor_manufacturer_init_params(nor);
> + spi_nor_init_default_params(nor);
>
> - if ((nor->info->parse_sfdp ||
> - (nor->info->no_sfdp_flags & (SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ |
> - SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ |
> - SPI_NOR_OCTAL_READ |
> - SPI_NOR_OCTAL_DTR_READ))) &&
> - !(nor->info->no_sfdp_flags & SPI_NOR_SKIP_SFDP))
> - spi_nor_sfdp_init_params(nor);
> + if (nor->info->parse_sfdp) {
> + ret = spi_nor_parse_sfdp(nor);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(nor->dev, "BFPT parsing failed. Please consider using SPI_NOR_SKIP_SFDP when declaring the flash\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> + } else {
> + spi_nor_init_params_deprecated(nor);
Hmm, a flash without SFDP would always go via the "deprecated" path even
if it is a new entry. It makes no difference in practice, but is just
slightly confusing logically. Can we make this a bit clearer? How about
this:
if (nor->info->parse_sfdp) {
...
} else if (nor->info->no_sfdp_flags & SPI_NOR_SKIP_SFDP) {
spi_nor_no_sfdp_init_params();
spi_nor_manufacturer_init_params();
} else {
spi_nor_init_params_deprecated();
}
> + }
>
> spi_nor_late_init_params(nor);
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
Texas Instruments Inc.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-06 12:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-03 14:22 [PATCH v5 00/14] mtd: spi-nor: Clean params init Tudor Ambarus
2021-12-03 14:22 ` [PATCH v5 01/14] mtd: spi-nor: Fix mtd size for s3an flashes Tudor Ambarus
2021-12-06 11:54 ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-06 14:40 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2021-12-03 14:22 ` [PATCH v5 02/14] mtd: spi-nor: core: Don't use mtd_info in the NOR's probe sequence of calls Tudor Ambarus
2021-12-06 11:55 ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-03 14:22 ` [PATCH v5 03/14] mtd: spi-nor: Introduce spi_nor_set_mtd_info() Tudor Ambarus
2021-12-03 14:22 ` [PATCH v5 04/14] mtd: spi-nor: core: Call spi_nor_post_sfdp_fixups() only when SFDP is defined Tudor Ambarus
2021-12-03 14:22 ` [PATCH v5 05/14] mtd: spi-nor: core: Introduce flash_info mfr_flags Tudor Ambarus
2021-12-03 14:22 ` [PATCH v5 06/14] mtd: spi-nor: Rework the flash_info flags Tudor Ambarus
2021-12-03 14:22 ` [PATCH v5 07/14] mtd: spi-nor: Introduce spi_nor_init_flags() Tudor Ambarus
2021-12-03 14:22 ` [PATCH v5 08/14] mtd: spi-nor: Introduce spi_nor_init_fixup_flags() Tudor Ambarus
2021-12-03 14:22 ` [PATCH v5 09/14] mtd: spi-nor: core: Init all flash parameters based on SFDP where possible Tudor Ambarus
2021-12-06 12:22 ` Pratyush Yadav [this message]
2021-12-06 13:52 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2021-12-06 15:04 ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-06 18:12 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2021-12-03 14:22 ` [PATCH v5 10/14] mtd: spi-nor: core: Move spi_nor_set_addr_width() in spi_nor_setup() Tudor Ambarus
2021-12-03 14:22 ` [PATCH v5 11/14] mtd: spi-nor: winbond: w25q256jvm: Init flash based on SFDP Tudor Ambarus
2021-12-03 14:22 ` [PATCH v5 12/14] mtd: spi-nor: spansion: s25fl256s0: Skip SFDP parsing Tudor Ambarus
2021-12-03 14:22 ` [PATCH v5 13/14] mtd: spi-nor: gigadevice: gd25q256: Init flash based on SFDP Tudor Ambarus
2021-12-03 14:22 ` [PATCH v5 14/14] mtd: spi-nor: issi: is25lp256: " Tudor Ambarus
2021-12-06 12:25 ` [PATCH v5 00/14] mtd: spi-nor: Clean params init Pratyush Yadav
2021-12-06 13:53 ` Tudor.Ambarus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211206122244.in6pzwjnxxo7yd32@ti.com \
--to=p.yadav@ti.com \
--cc=code@reto-schneider.ch \
--cc=esben@geanix.com \
--cc=figgyc@figgyc.uk \
--cc=heiko.thiery@gmail.com \
--cc=jaimeliao@mxic.com.tw \
--cc=knaerzche@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=macromorgan@hotmail.com \
--cc=mail@david-bauer.net \
--cc=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=sr@denx.de \
--cc=tudor.ambarus@microchip.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=zhengxunli@mxic.com.tw \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).