linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
To: Alex Kogan <alex.kogan@oracle.com>, <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	<peterz@infradead.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	<arnd@arndb.de>, <longman@redhat.com>,
	<linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	<bp@alien8.de>, <hpa@zytor.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	<jglauber@marvell.com>
Cc: rahul.x.yadav@oracle.com, dave.dice@oracle.com,
	steven.sistare@oracle.com, daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] locking/qspinlock: Rename arch_mcs_spin_unlock_contended to arch_mcs_pass_lock and make it more generic
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 14:25:45 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <22a45ca4-fcae-c805-596e-67f1809eb1dd@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190906142541.34061-2-alex.kogan@oracle.com>

Hi Alex,

On 2019/9/6 22:25, Alex Kogan wrote:
> The new macro should accept the value to be stored into the lock argument
> as another argument. This allows using the same macro in cases where the
> value to be stored when passing the lock is different from 1.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Kogan <alex.kogan@oracle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Steve Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/mcs_spinlock.h | 4 ++--
>  kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h       | 6 +++---
>  kernel/locking/qspinlock.c          | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/mcs_spinlock.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/mcs_spinlock.h
> index 529d2cf4d06f..f3f9efdcd2ca 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/mcs_spinlock.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/mcs_spinlock.h
> @@ -14,9 +14,9 @@ do {									\
>  		wfe();							\
>  } while (0)								\
>  
> -#define arch_mcs_spin_unlock_contended(lock)				\
> +#define arch_mcs_pass_lock(lock, val)					\

arch_mcs_spin_unlock_contended() has a matching function arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended(),
please see include/asm-generic/mcs_spinlock.h, so if we update this function name,
should we update the matching one as well? and update the relevant comments as well?

>  do {									\
> -	smp_store_release(lock, 1);					\
> +	smp_store_release((lock), (val));				\
>  	dsb_sev();							\
>  } while (0)
>  
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
> index 5e10153b4d3c..84327ca21650 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
> +++ b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
> @@ -41,8 +41,8 @@ do {									\
>   * operations in the critical section has been completed before
>   * unlocking.
>   */
> -#define arch_mcs_spin_unlock_contended(l)				\

Before this line of the code, there is:

#ifndef arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended

...

#define arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended(l)                 \

So #ifndef should be updated too.

Thanks
Hanjun


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-17  6:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-06 14:25 [PATCH v4 0/5] Add NUMA-awareness to qspinlock Alex Kogan
2019-09-06 14:25 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] locking/qspinlock: Rename arch_mcs_spin_unlock_contended to arch_mcs_pass_lock and make it more generic Alex Kogan
2019-09-17  6:25   ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2019-09-06 14:25 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] locking/qspinlock: Refactor the qspinlock slow path Alex Kogan
2019-09-06 14:25 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] locking/qspinlock: Introduce CNA into the slow path of qspinlock Alex Kogan
2019-09-17 17:44   ` Waiman Long
2019-09-19 15:55     ` Alex Kogan
2019-09-19 20:54       ` Waiman Long
2019-09-06 14:25 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] locking/qspinlock: Introduce starvation avoidance into CNA Alex Kogan
2019-09-17 18:07   ` Waiman Long
2019-09-06 14:25 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] locking/qspinlock: Introduce the shuffle reduction optimization " Alex Kogan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=22a45ca4-fcae-c805-596e-67f1809eb1dd@huawei.com \
    --to=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=alex.kogan@oracle.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
    --cc=dave.dice@oracle.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jglauber@marvell.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rahul.x.yadav@oracle.com \
    --cc=steven.sistare@oracle.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).