linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@gmail.com>,
	Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
	Ley Foon Tan <ley.foon.tan@intel.com>,
	rfi@lists.rocketboards.org, Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: rockchip: Avoid accessing PCIe registers with clocks gated
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 09:09:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5bee3702-595b-f57b-f962-28644b7e646f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210624224040.GA3567297@bjorn-Precision-5520>

Hello Bjorn,

On 6/25/21 12:40 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Michal, Ley Foon, Jingoo, Thierry, Jonathan]
> 
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 10:04:09AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> IRQ handlers that are registered for shared interrupts can be called at
>> any time after have been registered using the request_irq() function.
>>
>> It's up to drivers to ensure that's always safe for these to be called.
>>
>> Both the "pcie-sys" and "pcie-client" interrupts are shared, but since
>> their handlers are registered very early in the probe function, an error
>> later can lead to these handlers being executed before all the required
>> resources have been properly setup.
>>
>> For example, the rockchip_pcie_read() function used by these IRQ handlers
>> expects that some PCIe clocks will already be enabled, otherwise trying
>> to access the PCIe registers causes the read to hang and never return.
>>
>> The CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ option tests if drivers are able to cope with their
>> shared interrupt handlers being called, by generating a spurious interrupt
>> just before a shared interrupt handler is unregistered.
>>
>> But this means that if the option is enabled, any error in the probe path
>> of this driver could lead to one of the IRQ handlers to be executed.
> 
> I'm not an IRQ expert, but I think this is an issue regardless of
> CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ, isn't it?  Anything used by an IRQ handler should
> be initialized before the handler is registered.  CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ
> is just a way to help find latent problems.
>

Yes, it's an issue regardless. It's just that this debug option tests if the
drivers aren't making the wrong assumption, exactly to find issues like this.

>> In a rockpro64 board, the following sequence of events happens:
>>
>>   1) "pcie-sys" IRQ is requested and its handler registered.
>>   2) "pcie-client" IRQ is requested and its handler registered.
>>   3) probe later fails due readl_poll_timeout() returning a timeout.
>>   4) the "pcie-sys" IRQ is unregistered.
>>   5) CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ triggers a spurious interrupt.
>>   6) "pcie-client" IRQ handler is called for this spurious interrupt.
>>   7) IRQ handler tries to read PCIE_CLIENT_INT_STATUS with clocks gated.
>>   8) the machine hangs because rockchip_pcie_read() call never returns.
>>
>> To avoid cases like this, the handlers don't have to be registered until
>> very late in the probe function, once all the resources have been setup.
>>
>> So let's just move all the IRQ init before the pci_host_probe() call, that
>> will prevent issues like this and seems to be the correct thing to do too.
> 
> Previously we registered rockchip_pcie_subsys_irq_handler() and
> rockchip_pcie_client_irq_handler() before the PCIe clocks were
> enabled.  That's a problem because they depend on those clocks being
> enabled, and your patch fixes that.
>
> rockchip_pcie_legacy_int_handler() depends on rockchip->irq_domain,
> which isn't initialized until rockchip_pcie_init_irq_domain().
> Previously we registered rockchip_pcie_legacy_int_handler() as the
> handler for the "legacy" IRQ before rockchip_pcie_init_irq_domain().
> 
> I think you patch *also* fixes that problem, right?
>

Correct, that's why I moved the initialization and IRQ enable after that.
 
> I think this is also an issue with the following other drivers.  They all
> set the handler to something that uses an IRQ domain before they
> actually initialize the domain:

Yes, I agreed with your assessment and also noticed that others drivers have
similar issues. I just don't have any of those platforms to try to reproduce
the bugs and test a fix.

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Software Engineer
New Platform Technologies Enablement team
RHEL Engineering


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-25  7:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-08  8:04 [PATCH v2] PCI: rockchip: Avoid accessing PCIe registers with clocks gated Javier Martinez Canillas
2021-06-12 22:02 ` Peter Robinson
2021-06-22 10:31 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-06-24 21:57 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-24 23:18   ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-24 23:28     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-24 23:51       ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-24 22:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-25  7:09   ` Javier Martinez Canillas [this message]
2021-06-25 14:32     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-25 18:34       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2021-06-29  0:38   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-29  6:17     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2021-06-29 10:52       ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-29 23:14         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-30  9:44           ` Robin Murphy
2021-06-30 18:49         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-30 18:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-30 19:59   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2021-06-30 20:30     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-06-30 20:46       ` Peter Robinson
2021-06-30 22:09       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2021-07-01 13:59         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-07-01 14:59           ` Javier Martinez Canillas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5bee3702-595b-f57b-f962-28644b7e646f@redhat.com \
    --to=javierm@redhat.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ley.foon.tan@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
    --cc=pbrobinson@gmail.com \
    --cc=rfi@lists.rocketboards.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).