From: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
To: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>, Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>,
<ssantosh@kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: tony@atomide.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] soc: ti: add initial PRM driver with reset control support
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 18:01:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9372957c-9ab9-b0dd-fe07-815eb2cb2f16@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59709a2d-f13a-bd55-8aba-864c1cf2f19e@ti.com>
Hi Tero,
On 8/19/19 4:32 AM, Tero Kristo wrote:
> On 08/08/2019 08:26, Keerthy wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 07/08/19 1:18 PM, Tero Kristo wrote:
>>> Add initial PRM (Power and Reset Management) driver for TI OMAP class
>>> SoCs. Initially this driver only supports reset control, but can be
>>> extended to support rest of the functionality, like powerdomain
>>> control, PRCM irq support etc.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig | 1 +
>>> drivers/soc/ti/Makefile | 1 +
>>> drivers/soc/ti/omap_prm.c | 216
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 3 files changed, 218 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/ti/omap_prm.c
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig
>>> index fdb6743..42ad063 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig
>>> @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ config ARCH_OMAP2PLUS
>>> select TI_SYSC
>>> select OMAP_IRQCHIP
>>> select CLKSRC_TI_32K
>>> + select RESET_CONTROLLER
Use ARCH_HAS_RESET_CONTROLLER instead.
>>> help
>>> Systems based on OMAP2, OMAP3, OMAP4 or OMAP5
>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/Makefile b/drivers/soc/ti/Makefile
>>> index b3868d3..788b5cd 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/soc/ti/Makefile
>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/ti/Makefile
>>> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_KEYSTONE_NAVIGATOR_QMSS) += knav_qmss.o
>>> knav_qmss-y := knav_qmss_queue.o knav_qmss_acc.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_KEYSTONE_NAVIGATOR_DMA) += knav_dma.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_AMX3_PM) += pm33xx.o
>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2PLUS) += omap_prm.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_WKUP_M3_IPC) += wkup_m3_ipc.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_TI_SCI_PM_DOMAINS) += ti_sci_pm_domains.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_TI_SCI_INTA_MSI_DOMAIN) += ti_sci_inta_msi.o
>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/omap_prm.c b/drivers/soc/ti/omap_prm.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..7c89eb8
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/ti/omap_prm.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,216 @@
>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>> +/*
>>> + * OMAP2+ PRM driver
>>> + *
>>> + * Copyright (C) 2019 Texas Instruments Incorporated -
>>> http://www.ti.com/
>>> + * Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>>> +#include <linux/device.h>
>>> +#include <linux/io.h>
>>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>>> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>> +#include <linux/reset-controller.h>
>>> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>>> +
>>> +struct omap_rst_map {
>>> + s8 rst;
>>> + s8 st;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +struct omap_prm_data {
>>> + u32 base;
>>> + const char *name;
>>> + u16 pwstctrl;
>>> + u16 pwstst;
>>> + u16 rstctl;
Minor nit, can you use rstctrl instead here so that it is in sync with
the other variables and with the register names used in TRM.
>>> + u16 rstst;
>>> + struct omap_rst_map *rstmap;
>>> + u8 flags;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +struct omap_prm {
>>> + const struct omap_prm_data *data;
>>> + void __iomem *base;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +struct omap_reset_data {
>>> + struct reset_controller_dev rcdev;
>>> + struct omap_prm *prm;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +#define to_omap_reset_data(p) container_of((p), struct
>>> omap_reset_data, rcdev)
>>> +
>>> +#define OMAP_MAX_RESETS 8
>>> +#define OMAP_RESET_MAX_WAIT 10000
>>> +
>>> +#define OMAP_PRM_NO_RSTST BIT(0)
>>> +
>>> +static const struct of_device_id omap_prm_id_table[] = {
>>> + { },
>>> +};
>>
>> This table is blank and we are doing of_match_device against it.
>
> Yes, it gets populated with other patches in series, one entry per soc.
>
>>
>>> +
>>> +static int omap_reset_status(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
>>> + unsigned long id)
>>> +{
>>> + struct omap_reset_data *reset = to_omap_reset_data(rcdev);
>>> + u32 v;
>>> +
>>> + v = readl_relaxed(reset->prm->base + reset->prm->data->rstst);
>>> + v &= 1 << id;
>>> + v >>= id;
>>> +
>>> + return v;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int omap_reset_assert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
>>> + unsigned long id)
>>> +{
>>> + struct omap_reset_data *reset = to_omap_reset_data(rcdev);
>>> + u32 v;
>>> +
>>> + /* assert the reset control line */
>>> + v = readl_relaxed(reset->prm->base + reset->prm->data->rstctl);
>>> + v |= 1 << id;
>>> + writel_relaxed(v, reset->prm->base + reset->prm->data->rstctl);
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int omap_reset_get_st_bit(struct omap_reset_data *reset,
>>> + unsigned long id)
>>> +{
>>> + struct omap_rst_map *map = reset->prm->data->rstmap;
>>> +
>>> + while (map && map->rst >= 0) {
>>> + if (map->rst == id)
>>> + return map->st;
>>> +
>>> + map++;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return id;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * Note that status will not change until clocks are on, and clocks
>>> cannot be
>>> + * enabled until reset is deasserted. Consumer drivers must check
>>> status
>>> + * separately after enabling clocks.
>>> + */
>>> +static int omap_reset_deassert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
>>> + unsigned long id)
>>> +{
>>> + struct omap_reset_data *reset = to_omap_reset_data(rcdev);
>>> + u32 v;
>>> + int st_bit = id;
No need to initialize this, will always get overwritten below.
>>> + bool has_rstst;
>>> +
>>> + /* check the current status to avoid de-asserting the line twice */
>>> + v = readl_relaxed(reset->prm->base + reset->prm->data->rstctl);
>>> + if (!(v & BIT(id)))
>>> + return -EEXIST;
>>> +
>>> + has_rstst = !(reset->prm->data->flags & OMAP_PRM_NO_RSTST);
>>> +
>>> + if (has_rstst) {
>>> + st_bit = omap_reset_get_st_bit(reset, id);
>>> +
>>> + /* Clear the reset status by writing 1 to the status bit */
>>> + v = readl_relaxed(reset->prm->base + reset->prm->data->rstst);
>>> + v |= 1 << st_bit;
>>> + writel_relaxed(v, reset->prm->base + reset->prm->data->rstst);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* de-assert the reset control line */
>>> + v = readl_relaxed(reset->prm->base + reset->prm->data->rstctl);
>>> + v &= ~(1 << id);
>>> + writel_relaxed(v, reset->prm->base + reset->prm->data->rstctl);
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static const struct reset_control_ops omap_reset_ops = {
>>> + .assert = omap_reset_assert,
>>> + .deassert = omap_reset_deassert,
>>> + .status = omap_reset_status,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static int omap_prm_reset_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>> + struct omap_prm *prm)
Call this omap_prm_reset_init or something similar to avoid confusion.
>>> +{
>>> + struct omap_reset_data *reset;
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Check if we have resets. If either rstctl or rstst is
>>> + * non-zero, we have reset registers in place. Additionally
>>> + * the flag OMAP_PRM_NO_RSTST implies that we have resets.
>>> + */
>>> + if (!prm->data->rstctl && !prm->data->rstst &&
>>> + !(prm->data->flags & OMAP_PRM_NO_RSTST))
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> + reset = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*reset), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!reset)
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> + reset->rcdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
>>> + reset->rcdev.ops = &omap_reset_ops;
>>> + reset->rcdev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
>>> + reset->rcdev.nr_resets = OMAP_MAX_RESETS;
Suggest adding a number of resets to prm->data, and using it so that we
don't even entertain any resets beyond the actual number of resets.
You actually seem to be using the bit-position directly in client data
instead of a reset number. I am not sure if this is accepted practice
with reset controllers, do you incur any memory wastage?
>>> +
>>> + reset->prm = prm;
>>> +
>>> + return devm_reset_controller_register(&pdev->dev, &reset->rcdev);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int omap_prm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> +{
>>> + struct resource *res;
>>> + const struct omap_prm_data *data;
>>> + struct omap_prm *prm;
>>> + const struct of_device_id *match;
>>> +
>>> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>>> + if (!res)
>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>> +
>>> + match = of_match_device(omap_prm_id_table, &pdev->dev);
>>> + if (!match)
>>> + return -ENOTSUPP;
Use of_device_get_match_data() instead to do both match and get the
data. That can perhaps be the first block.
>>> +
>>> + prm = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*prm), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!prm)
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
Perhaps move the allocate after the match check to streamline.
>>> +
>>> + data = match->data;
>>> +
>>> + while (data->base != res->start) {
>>> + if (!data->base)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + data++;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + prm->data = data;
>>> +
>>> + prm->base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
>>> + if (!prm->base)
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> + return omap_prm_reset_probe(pdev, prm);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static struct platform_driver omap_prm_driver = {
>>> + .probe = omap_prm_probe,
>>> + .driver = {
>>> + .name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
>>> + .of_match_table = omap_prm_id_table,
>>> + },
>>> +};
>>> +builtin_platform_driver(omap_prm_driver);
>>> +
>>> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:prm");
Drop this and use MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE instead on omap_prm_id_table if
retaining, but I don't think these need to be defined.
regards
Suman
>>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("omap2+ prm driver");
>>
>> It is a builtin_platform_driver so do we need the MODULE*?
>
> Well, thats debatable, however some existing drivers do introduce this
> even if they are builtin.
>
> -Tero
> --
> Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
> Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-19 23:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-07 7:48 [PATCH 0/8] soc: ti: Add OMAP PRM driver Tero Kristo
2019-08-07 7:48 ` [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: omap: add new binding for PRM instances Tero Kristo
2019-08-08 4:35 ` Keerthy
2019-08-19 9:28 ` Tero Kristo
2019-08-19 21:28 ` Suman Anna
2019-08-20 7:45 ` Tero Kristo
2019-08-07 7:48 ` [PATCH 2/8] soc: ti: add initial PRM driver with reset control support Tero Kristo
2019-08-08 5:26 ` Keerthy
2019-08-19 9:32 ` Tero Kristo
2019-08-19 23:01 ` Suman Anna [this message]
2019-08-20 7:37 ` Tero Kristo
2019-08-20 16:47 ` Suman Anna
2019-08-21 15:10 ` Philipp Zabel
2019-08-21 15:45 ` Suman Anna
2019-08-21 18:15 ` Tero Kristo
2019-08-23 8:50 ` Philipp Zabel
2019-08-23 11:27 ` Tero Kristo
2019-08-07 7:48 ` [PATCH 3/8] soc: ti: omap-prm: poll for reset complete during de-assert Tero Kristo
2019-08-07 7:48 ` [PATCH 4/8] soc: ti: omap-prm: add support for denying idle for reset clockdomain Tero Kristo
2019-08-19 23:16 ` Suman Anna
2019-08-20 7:51 ` Tero Kristo
2019-08-07 7:48 ` [PATCH 5/8] soc: ti: omap-prm: add omap4 PRM data Tero Kristo
2019-08-08 5:30 ` Keerthy
2019-08-19 9:32 ` Tero Kristo
2019-08-19 23:08 ` Suman Anna
2019-08-20 7:52 ` Tero Kristo
2019-08-20 17:23 ` Suman Anna
2019-08-21 6:38 ` Tero Kristo
2019-08-07 7:48 ` [PATCH 6/8] soc: ti: omap_prm: add data for am33xx Tero Kristo
2019-08-19 23:11 ` Suman Anna
2019-08-20 18:48 ` Suman Anna
2019-08-21 7:23 ` Tero Kristo
2019-08-21 15:49 ` Suman Anna
2019-08-07 7:48 ` [PATCH 7/8] soc: ti: omap-prm: add dra7 PRM data Tero Kristo
2019-08-19 23:12 ` Suman Anna
2019-08-20 19:03 ` Suman Anna
2019-08-21 7:36 ` Tero Kristo
2019-08-07 7:48 ` [PATCH 8/8] ARM: OMAP2+: pdata-quirks: add PRM data for reset support Tero Kristo
2019-08-19 23:20 ` [PATCH 0/8] soc: ti: Add OMAP PRM driver Suman Anna
2019-08-20 7:54 ` Tero Kristo
2019-08-20 16:51 ` Suman Anna
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9372957c-9ab9-b0dd-fe07-815eb2cb2f16@ti.com \
--to=s-anna@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=j-keerthy@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
--cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).