From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
To: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: wsd_upstream <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>,
Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
"Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Miles Chen <miles.chen@mediatek.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kasan: add memory corruption identification for software tag-based mode
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 15:05:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+ZGEmGE2LFmRfPGgtUGwBqyL+s_CSp5DCpWGanTJCRcXw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <da7591c9-660d-d380-d59e-6d70b39eaa6b@virtuozzo.com>
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 2:27 PM Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> wrote:
> On 6/13/19 11:13 AM, Walter Wu wrote:
> > This patch adds memory corruption identification at bug report for
> > software tag-based mode, the report show whether it is "use-after-free"
> > or "out-of-bound" error instead of "invalid-access" error.This will make
> > it easier for programmers to see the memory corruption problem.
> >
> > Now we extend the quarantine to support both generic and tag-based kasan.
> > For tag-based kasan, the quarantine stores only freed object information
> > to check if an object is freed recently. When tag-based kasan reports an
> > error, we can check if the tagged addr is in the quarantine and make a
> > good guess if the object is more like "use-after-free" or "out-of-bound".
> >
>
>
> We already have all the information and don't need the quarantine to make such guess.
> Basically if shadow of the first byte of object has the same tag as tag in pointer than it's out-of-bounds,
> otherwise it's use-after-free.
>
> In pseudo-code it's something like this:
>
> u8 object_tag = *(u8 *)kasan_mem_to_shadow(nearest_object(cacche, page, access_addr));
>
> if (access_addr_tag == object_tag && object_tag != KASAN_TAG_INVALID)
> // out-of-bounds
> else
> // use-after-free
But we don't have redzones in tag mode (intentionally), so unless I am
missing something we don't have the necessary info. Both cases look
the same -- we hit a different tag.
There may only be a small trailer for kmalloc-allocated objects that
is painted with a different tag. I don't remember if we actually use a
different tag for the trailer. Since tag mode granularity is 16 bytes,
for smaller objects the trailer is impossible at all.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-13 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-13 8:13 [PATCH v3] kasan: add memory corruption identification for software tag-based mode Walter Wu
2019-06-13 12:27 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2019-06-13 13:05 ` Dmitry Vyukov [this message]
2019-06-13 15:50 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2019-06-13 17:46 ` Walter Wu
2019-06-14 2:32 ` Walter Wu
2019-06-17 4:00 ` Walter Wu
2019-06-17 11:57 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-06-17 12:32 ` Walter Wu
2019-07-01 9:56 ` Walter Wu
2019-07-05 13:34 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-07-08 16:33 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2019-07-09 2:53 ` Walter Wu
2019-07-10 18:24 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2019-07-11 10:06 ` Walter Wu
2019-07-12 10:52 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2019-07-15 3:06 ` Walter Wu
2019-07-18 16:11 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2019-07-22 9:52 ` Walter Wu
2019-07-26 12:00 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2019-07-26 12:28 ` Walter Wu
2019-07-26 12:52 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2019-07-26 13:19 ` Walter Wu
2019-07-31 17:04 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2019-08-02 3:04 ` Walter Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACT4Y+ZGEmGE2LFmRfPGgtUGwBqyL+s_CSp5DCpWGanTJCRcXw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=miles.chen@mediatek.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com \
--cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).