From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Schrempf Frieder <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add Kontron i.MX6UL N6310 compatibles
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 15:45:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJKOXPc6UNMszVr+fRdLtPxj0GFVrwJ7JqyGrzXz+MC=fY7gUA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_Jsq+YZ9KdCCT1grtpf7Z1o=-mFuq3O=o7iVGSAhJYO1-=Ww@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 at 14:52, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 12:55 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 03:27:39PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > I see. If I understand the schema correctly, this should look like:
> > >
> > > Looks correct, but a couple of comments.
> > >
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > > index 7294ac36f4c0..eb263d1ccf13 100644
> > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > > @@ -161,6 +161,22 @@ properties:
> > > > items:
> > > > - enum:
> > > > - fsl,imx6ul-14x14-evk # i.MX6 UltraLite 14x14 EVK Board
> > > > + - kontron,imx6ul-n6310-som # Kontron N6310 SOM
> > >
> > > Is the SOM ever used alone? If not, then no point in listing this here.
> >
> > SoM alone: no, because it requires some type of base board. However it
> > will be used by some customer designs with some amount of
> > changes/addons.
> >
> > Looking at other aproaches, usually SoMs have their own compatible. In
> > such case - I should document it somewhere.
>
> I wasn't suggesting not having the compatible for it, but you don't
> need it in this list because that is not valid. You have to list it
> with the base board compatibles.
The diff against v7 would be like this then:
---
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
index 1f440817fc03..7219c15f6185 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
@@ -161,7 +161,6 @@ properties:
items:
- enum:
- fsl,imx6ul-14x14-evk # i.MX6 UltraLite 14x14 EVK Board
- - kontron,imx6ul-n6310-som # Kontron N6310 SOM
- const: fsl,imx6ul
- description: Kontron N6310 S Board
---
This passes the dtbs_check.
I'll send v8
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-22 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-20 15:35 [PATCH v6 1/4] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add Anvo-Systems Krzysztof Kozlowski
2019-08-20 15:35 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] dt-bindings: eeprom: at25: Add Anvo ANV32E61W Krzysztof Kozlowski
2019-08-20 15:35 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add Kontron i.MX6UL N6310 compatibles Krzysztof Kozlowski
2019-08-20 16:59 ` Rob Herring
2019-08-20 18:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2019-08-20 20:04 ` Rob Herring
2019-08-20 20:21 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2019-08-20 20:27 ` Rob Herring
2019-08-21 17:54 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2019-08-22 12:51 ` Rob Herring
2019-08-22 13:45 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2019-08-20 15:35 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] ARM: dts: imx6ul-kontron-n6310: Add Kontron i.MX6UL N6310 SoM and boards Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJKOXPc6UNMszVr+fRdLtPxj0GFVrwJ7JqyGrzXz+MC=fY7gUA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=frieder.schrempf@kontron.de \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).