linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-oxnas@groups.io, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-soc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/9] ARM: oxnas: remove CPU hotplug implementation
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 18:00:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1gXVI3-00088u-N6@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181213175952.GC26090@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>

The CPU hotplug implementation on this platform is cargo-culted from
the plat-versatile implementation, and is buggy.  Once a CPU hits the
"low power" loop, it will wait for pen_release to be set to the CPU
number to wake up again - but nothing in this implementation does that.

So, once a CPU has entered cpu_die() it will never, ever leave.

Remove this useless cargo-culted implementation.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
---
 arch/arm/mach-oxnas/Makefile  |   1 -
 arch/arm/mach-oxnas/hotplug.c | 109 ------------------------------------------
 arch/arm/mach-oxnas/platsmp.c |   4 --
 3 files changed, 114 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-oxnas/hotplug.c

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-oxnas/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-oxnas/Makefile
index b625906a9970..61a34e1c0f22 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-oxnas/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-oxnas/Makefile
@@ -1,2 +1 @@
 obj-$(CONFIG_SMP)		+= platsmp.o headsmp.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) 	+= hotplug.o
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-oxnas/hotplug.c b/arch/arm/mach-oxnas/hotplug.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 854f29b8cba6..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-oxnas/hotplug.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,109 +0,0 @@
-/*
- *  Copyright (C) 2002 ARM Ltd.
- *  All Rights Reserved
- *
- * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
- * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
- * published by the Free Software Foundation.
- */
-#include <linux/kernel.h>
-#include <linux/errno.h>
-#include <linux/smp.h>
-
-#include <asm/cp15.h>
-#include <asm/smp_plat.h>
-
-static inline void cpu_enter_lowpower(void)
-{
-	unsigned int v;
-
-	asm volatile(
-	"	mcr	p15, 0, %1, c7, c5, 0\n"
-	"	mcr	p15, 0, %1, c7, c10, 4\n"
-	/*
-	 * Turn off coherency
-	 */
-	"	mrc	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 1\n"
-	"	bic	%0, %0, #0x20\n"
-	"	mcr	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 1\n"
-	"	mrc	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 0\n"
-	"	bic	%0, %0, %2\n"
-	"	mcr	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 0\n"
-	  : "=&r" (v)
-	  : "r" (0), "Ir" (CR_C)
-	  : "cc");
-}
-
-static inline void cpu_leave_lowpower(void)
-{
-	unsigned int v;
-
-	asm volatile(	"mrc	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 0\n"
-	"	orr	%0, %0, %1\n"
-	"	mcr	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 0\n"
-	"	mrc	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 1\n"
-	"	orr	%0, %0, #0x20\n"
-	"	mcr	p15, 0, %0, c1, c0, 1\n"
-	  : "=&r" (v)
-	  : "Ir" (CR_C)
-	  : "cc");
-}
-
-static inline void platform_do_lowpower(unsigned int cpu, int *spurious)
-{
-	/*
-	 * there is no power-control hardware on this platform, so all
-	 * we can do is put the core into WFI; this is safe as the calling
-	 * code will have already disabled interrupts
-	 */
-	for (;;) {
-		/*
-		 * here's the WFI
-		 */
-		asm(".word	0xe320f003\n"
-		    :
-		    :
-		    : "memory", "cc");
-
-		if (pen_release == cpu_logical_map(cpu)) {
-			/*
-			 * OK, proper wakeup, we're done
-			 */
-			break;
-		}
-
-		/*
-		 * Getting here, means that we have come out of WFI without
-		 * having been woken up - this shouldn't happen
-		 *
-		 * Just note it happening - when we're woken, we can report
-		 * its occurrence.
-		 */
-		(*spurious)++;
-	}
-}
-
-/*
- * platform-specific code to shutdown a CPU
- *
- * Called with IRQs disabled
- */
-void ox820_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
-{
-	int spurious = 0;
-
-	/*
-	 * we're ready for shutdown now, so do it
-	 */
-	cpu_enter_lowpower();
-	platform_do_lowpower(cpu, &spurious);
-
-	/*
-	 * bring this CPU back into the world of cache
-	 * coherency, and then restore interrupts
-	 */
-	cpu_leave_lowpower();
-
-	if (spurious)
-		pr_warn("CPU%u: %u spurious wakeup calls\n", cpu, spurious);
-}
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-oxnas/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-oxnas/platsmp.c
index 442cc8a2f7dc..735141c0e3a3 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-oxnas/platsmp.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-oxnas/platsmp.c
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
 #include <asm/smp_scu.h>
 
 extern void ox820_secondary_startup(void);
-extern void ox820_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu);
 
 static void __iomem *cpu_ctrl;
 static void __iomem *gic_cpu_ctrl;
@@ -94,9 +93,6 @@ static void __init ox820_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
 static const struct smp_operations ox820_smp_ops __initconst = {
 	.smp_prepare_cpus	= ox820_smp_prepare_cpus,
 	.smp_boot_secondary	= ox820_boot_secondary,
-#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
-	.cpu_die		= ox820_cpu_die,
-#endif
 };
 
 CPU_METHOD_OF_DECLARE(ox820_smp, "oxsemi,ox820-smp", &ox820_smp_ops);
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-12-13 18:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-13 17:59 [PATCH 0/9] Clean up ARM SMP/CPU hotplug implementations Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-12-13 18:00 ` [PATCH 1/9] ARM: omap2: remove unnecessary boot_lock Russell King
2018-12-13 18:00 ` [PATCH 2/9] ARM: qcom: " Russell King
2019-01-10 12:50   ` Linus Walleij
2019-01-10 20:56     ` Stephen Boyd
2019-01-10 21:47       ` Linus Walleij
2019-01-11 15:09     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2019-01-13 22:46       ` Linus Walleij
2019-01-10 22:05   ` Stephen Boyd
2018-12-13 18:00 ` Russell King [this message]
2018-12-20 14:03   ` [PATCH 3/9] ARM: oxnas: remove CPU hotplug implementation Neil Armstrong
2018-12-13 18:00 ` [PATCH 4/9] ARM: sti: remove pen_release and boot_lock Russell King
2018-12-17  8:22   ` Patrice CHOTARD
2018-12-13 18:01 ` [PATCH 5/9] ARM: actions: remove boot_lock and pen_release Russell King
2018-12-13 18:01 ` [PATCH 6/9] ARM: vexpress/realview: consolidate immitation CPU hotplug Russell King
2018-12-13 18:01 ` [PATCH 7/9] ARM: versatile: convert boot_lock to raw Russell King
2018-12-13 18:01 ` [PATCH 8/9] ARM: versatile: rename and comment SMP implementation Russell King
2018-12-13 18:01 ` [PATCH 9/9] ARM: smp: remove arch-provided "pen_release" Russell King
2018-12-14  4:39   ` Viresh Kumar
2018-12-14 13:12     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-12-17  6:16       ` Viresh Kumar
2018-12-20 10:10 ` [PATCH 0/9] Clean up ARM SMP/CPU hotplug implementations Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-12-20 10:23   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-12-20 11:05     ` Russell King - ARM Linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1gXVI3-00088u-N6@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-oxnas@groups.io \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).