linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>,
	Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>, <nm@ti.com>,
	<t-kristo@ti.com>, <ssantosh@kernel.org>, <lokeshvutla@ti.com>,
	"Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@ti.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] soc: ti: k3-socinfo: Add entry for AM64 SoC family
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 12:37:54 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa46191e-2c44-4220-0fcd-6e68f226d6c5@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c2dcf5a3-abff-923c-7610-a670f02479e6@ti.com>



On 10/1/20 12:12 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Hi Grygorii,
> 
> On 30/09/2020 16.56, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 28/09/2020 11:34, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>>> It's JTAG PARTNO is 0xBB38.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c | 1 +
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c b/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c
>>> index bbbc2d2b7091..a14ec68846dd 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c
>>> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ static const struct k3_soc_id {
>>>       { 0xBB5A, "AM65X" },
>>>       { 0xBB64, "J721E" },
>>>       { 0xBB6D, "J7200" },
>>> +    { 0xBB38, "AM64" }
>>
>> Shouldn't it be AM64X
> 
> Good point, I'll fix this up and then the DMA series.
> 
> While here, what do you think: should we keep the DMA compatibles as I
> have them in v1 (am64-dmss-bcdma and am64-dmss-pktdma):
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200930091412.8020-10-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com/
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200930091412.8020-11-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com/
> 
> or change them to am64x-dmss-* ?
> 
> I'll ask Rob on the binding doc patches as well.

As long as differences within the family are discoverable by some other
means, wild chars may be okay. See one of Rob's earlier responses:

https://linuxlists.cc/l/1/linux-kernel/t/3311057/(patch_1_2)_dt-bindings:_ptp:_add_binding_doc_for_idt_clockmatrix_based_ptp_clock

Regards
Vignesh

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

      reply	other threads:[~2020-10-01  7:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-28  8:34 [PATCH 00/11] firmware/soc: ti_sci, ringacc/inta: Preparation for AM64 DMA support Peter Ujfalusi
2020-09-28  8:34 ` [PATCH 01/11] firmware: ti_sci: rm: Add support for tx_tdtype parameter for tx channel Peter Ujfalusi
2020-09-28  8:34 ` [PATCH 02/11] firmware: ti_sci: Use struct ti_sci_resource_desc in get_range ops Peter Ujfalusi
2020-09-28  8:34 ` [PATCH 03/11] firmware: ti_sci: rm: Add support for second resource range Peter Ujfalusi
2020-09-28  8:34 ` [PATCH 04/11] soc: ti: ti_sci_inta_msi: Add support for second range in resource ranges Peter Ujfalusi
2020-09-28  8:34 ` [PATCH 05/11] firmware: ti_sci: rm: Add support for extended_ch_type for tx channel Peter Ujfalusi
2020-09-28  8:34 ` [PATCH 06/11] firmware: ti_sci: rm: Remove ring_get_config support Peter Ujfalusi
2020-09-30 11:14   ` Grygorii Strashko
2020-09-28  8:34 ` [PATCH 07/11] firmware: ti_sci: rm: Add new ops for ring configuration Peter Ujfalusi
2020-09-30 13:54   ` Grygorii Strashko
2020-09-28  8:34 ` [PATCH 08/11] soc: ti: k3-ringacc: Use the ti_sci set_cfg callback " Peter Ujfalusi
2020-09-30 13:55   ` Grygorii Strashko
2020-09-28  8:34 ` [PATCH 09/11] firmware: ti_sci: rm: Remove unused config() from ti_sci_rm_ringacc_ops Peter Ujfalusi
2020-09-30 13:55   ` Grygorii Strashko
2020-09-28  8:34 ` [PATCH 10/11] soc: ti: k3-ringacc: Use correct device for allocation in RING mode Peter Ujfalusi
2020-09-30 13:58   ` Grygorii Strashko
2020-09-28  8:34 ` [PATCH 11/11] soc: ti: k3-socinfo: Add entry for AM64 SoC family Peter Ujfalusi
2020-09-30 13:56   ` Grygorii Strashko
2020-10-01  6:42     ` Peter Ujfalusi
2020-10-01  7:07       ` Vignesh Raghavendra [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fa46191e-2c44-4220-0fcd-6e68f226d6c5@ti.com \
    --to=vigneshr@ti.com \
    --cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lokeshvutla@ti.com \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
    --cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
    --cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
    --cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).