From: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>, will@kernel.org, joro@8bytes.org
Cc: robh@kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com,
narmstrong@baylibre.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Correct Mali attributes
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 11:41:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fe46d0e7-ab88-4bfd-ac4f-a08b75696d73@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8b9515e86053910196cbc90b71af97be8928585c.1568211045.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>
On 11/09/2019 15:42, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Whilst Midgard's MEMATTR follows a similar principle to the VMSA MAIR,
> the actual attribute values differ, so although it currently appears to
> work to some degree, we probably shouldn't be using our standard stage 1
> MAIR for that. Instead, generate a reasonable MEMATTR with attribute
> values borrowed from the kbase driver; at this point we'll be overriding
> or ignoring pretty much all of the LPAE config, so just implement these
> Mali details in a dedicated allocator instead of pretending to subclass
> the standard VMSA format.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
The Midgard MMU "uses concepts" from LPAE but really isn't LPAE, so this
seems like a good tidy up.
Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Steve
> ---
> drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
> index 161a7d56264d..9e35cd991f06 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
> @@ -167,6 +167,9 @@
> #define ARM_MALI_LPAE_TTBR_READ_INNER BIT(2)
> #define ARM_MALI_LPAE_TTBR_SHARE_OUTER BIT(4)
>
> +#define ARM_MALI_LPAE_MEMATTR_IMP_DEF 0x88ULL
> +#define ARM_MALI_LPAE_MEMATTR_WRITE_ALLOC 0x8DULL
> +
> /* IOPTE accessors */
> #define iopte_deref(pte,d) __va(iopte_to_paddr(pte, d))
>
> @@ -1013,27 +1016,51 @@ arm_32_lpae_alloc_pgtable_s2(struct io_pgtable_cfg *cfg, void *cookie)
> static struct io_pgtable *
> arm_mali_lpae_alloc_pgtable(struct io_pgtable_cfg *cfg, void *cookie)
> {
> - struct io_pgtable *iop;
> + struct arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data;
> +
> + /* No quirks for Mali (hopefully) */
> + if (cfg->quirks)
> + return NULL;
>
> if (cfg->ias != 48 || cfg->oas > 40)
> return NULL;
>
> cfg->pgsize_bitmap &= (SZ_4K | SZ_2M | SZ_1G);
> - iop = arm_64_lpae_alloc_pgtable_s1(cfg, cookie);
> - if (iop) {
> - u64 mair, ttbr;
>
> - /* Copy values as union fields overlap */
> - mair = cfg->arm_lpae_s1_cfg.mair[0];
> - ttbr = cfg->arm_lpae_s1_cfg.ttbr[0];
> + data = arm_lpae_alloc_pgtable(cfg);
> + if (!data)
> + return NULL;
>
> - cfg->arm_mali_lpae_cfg.memattr = mair;
> - cfg->arm_mali_lpae_cfg.transtab = ttbr |
> - ARM_MALI_LPAE_TTBR_READ_INNER |
> - ARM_MALI_LPAE_TTBR_ADRMODE_TABLE;
> - }
> + /*
> + * MEMATTR: Mali has no actual notion of a non-cacheable type, so the
> + * best we can do is mimic the out-of-tree driver and hope that the
> + * "implementation-defined caching policy" is good enough. Similarly,
> + * we'll use it for the sake of a valid attribute for our 'device'
> + * index, although callers should never request that in practice.
> + */
> + cfg->arm_mali_lpae_cfg.memattr =
> + (ARM_MALI_LPAE_MEMATTR_IMP_DEF
> + << ARM_LPAE_MAIR_ATTR_SHIFT(ARM_LPAE_MAIR_ATTR_IDX_NC)) |
> + (ARM_MALI_LPAE_MEMATTR_WRITE_ALLOC
> + << ARM_LPAE_MAIR_ATTR_SHIFT(ARM_LPAE_MAIR_ATTR_IDX_CACHE)) |
> + (ARM_MALI_LPAE_MEMATTR_IMP_DEF
> + << ARM_LPAE_MAIR_ATTR_SHIFT(ARM_LPAE_MAIR_ATTR_IDX_DEV));
>
> - return iop;
> + data->pgd = __arm_lpae_alloc_pages(data->pgd_size, GFP_KERNEL, cfg);
> + if (!data->pgd)
> + goto out_free_data;
> +
> + /* Ensure the empty pgd is visible before TRANSTAB can be written */
> + wmb();
> +
> + cfg->arm_mali_lpae_cfg.transtab = virt_to_phys(data->pgd) |
> + ARM_MALI_LPAE_TTBR_READ_INNER |
> + ARM_MALI_LPAE_TTBR_ADRMODE_TABLE;
> + return &data->iop;
> +
> +out_free_data:
> + kfree(data);
> + return NULL;
> }
>
> struct io_pgtable_init_fns io_pgtable_arm_64_lpae_s1_init_fns = {
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-12 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-11 14:42 [PATCH 0/3] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Mali LPAE improvements Robin Murphy
2019-09-11 14:42 ` [PATCH 1/3] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Correct Mali attributes Robin Murphy
2019-09-12 10:41 ` Steven Price [this message]
2019-09-11 14:42 ` [PATCH 2/3] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Support more Mali configurations Robin Murphy
2019-09-12 10:47 ` Steven Price
2019-09-11 14:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Allow coherent walks for Mali Robin Murphy
2019-09-12 10:53 ` Steven Price
2019-09-11 16:19 ` [PATCH 0/3] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Mali LPAE improvements Neil Armstrong
2019-09-11 16:20 ` Will Deacon
2019-09-11 17:19 ` Robin Murphy
2019-09-19 8:30 ` Will Deacon
2019-09-23 8:17 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2019-09-23 11:04 ` Robin Murphy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fe46d0e7-ab88-4bfd-ac4f-a08b75696d73@arm.com \
--to=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).