linux-arm-msm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: benl-kernelpatches@squareup.com
To: robdclark@gmail.com, sean@poorly.run
Cc: Benjamin Li <benl@squareup.com>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <kholk11@gmail.com>,
	Harigovindan P <harigovi@codeaurora.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@gmail.com>,
	zhengbin <zhengbin13@huawei.com>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] drm/msm/dsi: save PLL registers across first PHY reset
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 00:10:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <010101750064e17e-3db0087e-fc37-494d-aac9-2c2b9b0a7c5b-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> (raw)

From: Benjamin Li <benl@squareup.com>

Take advantage of previously-added support for persisting PLL
registers across DSI PHY disable/enable cycles (see 328e1a6
'drm/msm/dsi: Save/Restore PLL status across PHY reset') to
support persisting across the very first DSI PHY enable at
boot.

The bootloader may have left the PLL registers in a non-default
state. For example, for dsi_pll_28nm.c on 8x16/8x39, the byte
clock mux's power-on reset configuration is to bypass DIV1, but
depending on bandwidth requirements[1] the bootloader may have
set the DIV1 path.

When the byte clock mux is registered with the generic clock
framework at probe time, the framework reads & caches the value
of the mux bit field (the initial clock parent). After PHY enable,
when clk_set_rate is called on the byte clock, the framework
assumes there is no need to reparent, and doesn't re-write the
mux bit field. But PHY enable resets PLL registers, so the mux
bit field actually silently reverted to the DIV1 bypass path.
This causes the byte clock to be off by a factor of e.g. 2 for
our tested WXGA panel.

The above issue manifests as the display not working and a
constant stream of FIFO/LP0 contention errors.

[1] The specific requirement for triggering the DIV1 path (and
thus this issue) on 28nm is a panel with pixel clock <116.7MHz
(one-third the minimum VCO setting). FHD/1080p (~145MHz) is fine,
WXGA/1280x800 (~75MHz) is not.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Li <benl@squareup.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.c
index 009f5b843dd1..139b4a5aaf86 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.c
@@ -621,6 +621,22 @@ static int dsi_phy_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		phy->pll = NULL;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * As explained in msm_dsi_phy_enable, resetting the DSI PHY (as done
+	 * in dsi_mgr_phy_enable) silently changes its PLL registers to power-on
+	 * defaults, but the generic clock framework manages and caches several
+	 * of the PLL registers. It initializes these caches at registration
+	 * time via register read.
+	 *
+	 * As a result, we need to save DSI PLL registers once at probe in order
+	 * for the first call to msm_dsi_phy_enable to successfully bring PLL
+	 * registers back in line with what the generic clock framework expects.
+	 *
+	 * Subsequent PLL restores during msm_dsi_phy_enable will always be
+	 * paired with PLL saves in msm_dsi_phy_disable.
+	 */
+	msm_dsi_pll_save_state(phy->pll);
+
 	dsi_phy_disable_resource(phy);
 
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, phy);
-- 
2.17.1


             reply	other threads:[~2020-10-07  0:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-07  0:10 benl-kernelpatches [this message]
2020-10-30 13:55 ` [PATCH] drm/msm/dsi: save PLL registers across first PHY reset Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-01-30  2:00   ` Benjamin Li
2021-01-30 16:16     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2020-10-30 15:12 ` [PATCH] drm/msm/dsi: do not try reading 28nm vco rate if it's not enabled Dmitry Baryshkov
2020-12-29 20:15   ` patchwork-bot+linux-arm-msm
2021-05-15  0:33 ` [PATCH] drm/msm/dsi: save PLL registers across first PHY reset Dmitry Baryshkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=010101750064e17e-3db0087e-fc37-494d-aac9-2c2b9b0a7c5b-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com \
    --to=benl-kernelpatches@squareup.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=benl@squareup.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=harigovi@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=kholk11@gmail.com \
    --cc=konradybcio@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=sean@poorly.run \
    --cc=zhengbin13@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).