From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A062C352A3 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 17:22:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DEC520733 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 17:22:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=serbinski.com header.i=@serbinski.com header.b="I+oJYFey" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727054AbgBJRWc (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Feb 2020 12:22:32 -0500 Received: from mail.serbinski.com ([162.218.126.2]:39976 "EHLO mail.serbinski.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727558AbgBJRWb (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Feb 2020 12:22:31 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mail.serbinski.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52FC3D006F9; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 17:22:30 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at serbinski.com Received: from mail.serbinski.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.serbinski.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q5mv8vr5Wc_5; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 12:22:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.serbinski.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.serbinski.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C52E1D00693; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 12:22:25 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.serbinski.com C52E1D00693 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=serbinski.com; s=default; t=1581355345; bh=LBzPdGEvwXi/b0wHoq1y99U4fh/apqlgThb7ByyzJUQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=I+oJYFeyvVH0rl8fhLnZoA46MBMSXaNBbQgsWJHz/BIT7MyH5m+W8OKmZe/ZdtgY5 oW8fB5nV3+qJK4zTqKNQ1zJB2SMGVPrO/1EkP3gX0dJxhuJM05szGSU1hJuq+m92O1 ija4PhNMz5IrU7i3eVCjph9mJwspfSL0dQIzBaT4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 12:22:25 -0500 From: Adam Serbinski To: Srinivas Kandagatla Cc: Mark Brown , Rob Herring , Bjorn Andersson , Andy Gross , Mark Rutland , Liam Girdwood , Patrick Lai , Banajit Goswami , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] ASoC: qdsp6: q6afe-dai: add support to pcm port dais In-Reply-To: References: <20200207205013.12274-1-adam@serbinski.com> <20200209154748.3015-1-adam@serbinski.com> <20200209154748.3015-4-adam@serbinski.com> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4-beta Message-ID: <616e3042f46cb7f052fc71e0ba4919a2@serbinski.com> X-Sender: adam@serbinski.com Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On 2020-02-10 12:13, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: > Few minor comments > >> +static int q6afe_tdm_set_sysclk(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, >> + int clk_id, unsigned int freq, int dir) >> +{ > > Why are we adding exactly duplicate function of q6afe_mi2s_set_sysclk > here? It isn't an exact duplicate. The reason I split off the new function is because the clock IDs for PCM overlap/duplicate the clock IDs for TDM, yet the parameters to q6afe_port_set_sysclk are not the same for PCM and TDM. >> + SND_SOC_DAPM_AIF_IN("QUAT_PCM_RX", NULL, >> + 0, 0, 0, 0), > > This can be in single line, same for below I will adjust these.