linux-arm-msm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
To: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Ravi Kumar Bokka (Temp)" <rbokka@codeaurora.org>,
	Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nvmem: qfprom: minor nit fixes
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 08:22:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=W=dGfp2qvDNSg8keGSrGsOf_pEqjRzabrEyr8OdeBARA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1619416452-6852-1-git-send-email-rnayak@codeaurora.org>

Hi,

On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 10:54 PM Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
> Fix a missed newline, change an 'if' to 'else if' and update
> a comment which is stale after the merge of '5a1bea2a: nvmem:
> qfprom: Add support for fuseblowing on sc7280'
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> v2: Added the change to move the 'if' to 'else if'
> Sending a follow-up patch for these nits since they came in after
> the previous patch was already pulled in
> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1401964/
>
>  drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c
> index d6d3f24..1ba666b 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c
> @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ static const struct qfprom_soc_compatible_data sc7280_qfprom = {
>         .keepout = sc7280_qfprom_keepout,
>         .nkeepout = ARRAY_SIZE(sc7280_qfprom_keepout)
>  };
> +
>  /**
>   * qfprom_disable_fuse_blowing() - Undo enabling of fuse blowing.
>   * @priv: Our driver data.
> @@ -195,7 +196,7 @@ static int qfprom_enable_fuse_blowing(const struct qfprom_priv *priv,
>         }
>
>         /*
> -        * Hardware requires 1.8V min for fuse blowing; this may be
> +        * Hardware requires a min voltage for fuse blowing; this may be
>          * a rail shared do don't specify a max--regulator constraints

Joe pointed out a typo in the original comment that "do" should be
"so" [1], but that's not new to your patch so:

Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/73945e7037ab61eb34a2a1af05aa3eef75c8f836.camel@perches.com

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-26 15:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-26  5:54 [PATCH v2] nvmem: qfprom: minor nit fixes Rajendra Nayak
2021-04-26 15:22 ` Doug Anderson [this message]
2021-05-17  9:24 ` Srinivas Kandagatla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAD=FV=W=dGfp2qvDNSg8keGSrGsOf_pEqjRzabrEyr8OdeBARA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rbokka@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).