linux-arm-msm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
To: Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@free.fr>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham <kishon@ti.com>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc: MSM <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] phy: qcom-qmp: Raise qcom_qmp_phy_enable() polling delay
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 15:20:07 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a3a50cf5-083a-5aa8-e77c-6feb2f2fd866@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <92d97c68-d226-6290-37d6-f46f42ea604b@free.fr>

Hi Marc,

On 6/13/2019 5:02 PM, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> readl_poll_timeout() calls usleep_range() to sleep between reads.
> usleep_range() doesn't work efficiently for tiny values.
>
> Raise the polling delay in qcom_qmp_phy_enable() to bring it in line
> with the delay in qcom_qmp_phy_com_init().
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@free.fr>
> ---
> Vivek, do you remember why you didn't use the same delay value in
> qcom_qmp_phy_enable) and qcom_qmp_phy_com_init() ?

phy_qcom_init() thingy came from the PCIE phy driver from downstream 
msm-3.18
PCIE did something as below:

-----
do {
         if (pcie_phy_is_ready(dev))
                 break;
         retries++;
         usleep_range(REFCLK_STABILIZATION_DELAY_US_MIN,
                                  REFCLK_STABILIZATION_DELAY_US_MAX);
} while (retries < PHY_READY_TIMEOUT_COUNT);

REFCLK_STABILIZATION_DELAY_US_MIN/MAX ==> 1000/1005
PHY_READY_TIMEOUT_COUNT ==> 10
-----


phy_enable() from the usb phy driver from downstream.
  /* Wait for PHY initialization to be done */
  do {
          if (readl_relaxed(phy->base +
                  phy->phy_reg[USB3_PHY_PCS_STATUS]) & PHYSTATUS)
                  usleep_range(1, 2);
else
break;
  } while (--init_timeout_usec);

init_timeout_usec ==> 1000
-----
USB never had a COM_PHY status bit.

So clearly the resolutions were different.

Does this change solves an issue at hand?

> ---
>   drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c
> index bb522b915fa9..34ff6434da8f 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c
> @@ -1548,7 +1548,7 @@ static int qcom_qmp_phy_enable(struct phy *phy)
>   	status = pcs + cfg->regs[QPHY_PCS_READY_STATUS];
>   	mask = cfg->mask_pcs_ready;
>   
> -	ret = readl_poll_timeout(status, val, val & mask, 1,
> +	ret = readl_poll_timeout(status, val, val & mask, 10,
>   				 PHY_INIT_COMPLETE_TIMEOUT);
>   	if (ret) {
>   		dev_err(qmp->dev, "phy initialization timed-out\n");


  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-14  9:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-13 11:32 [PATCH v1] phy: qcom-qmp: Raise qcom_qmp_phy_enable() polling delay Marc Gonzalez
2019-06-14  9:50 ` Vivek Gautam [this message]
2019-06-14 12:38   ` Marc Gonzalez
2019-06-20  6:25     ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-06-24 11:55       ` Marc Gonzalez
2019-06-24 15:52 ` Doug Anderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a3a50cf5-083a-5aa8-e77c-6feb2f2fd866@codeaurora.org \
    --to=vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.w.gonzalez@free.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).