From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E90C433F5 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 13:01:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD8A36108F for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 13:01:38 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org DD8A36108F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=paul-moore.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=tempfail smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-12-MOjv6ES0OcuplNCBgAwnyw-1; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 09:01:34 -0400 X-MC-Unique: MOjv6ES0OcuplNCBgAwnyw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56DAF1926DA1; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 13:01:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 336C160C0F; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 13:01:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F6B4EA2A; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 13:01:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.2]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 1A2D1RDT014357 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 09:01:27 -0400 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id 45DFA400F3C3; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 13:01:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast04.extmail.prod.ext.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.55.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41E9C40C1252 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 13:01:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 041E91064FB0 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 13:01:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ed1-f54.google.com (mail-ed1-f54.google.com [209.85.208.54]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-353-zReo-sa2PHK0cm1VX-3Vdw-1; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 09:01:24 -0400 X-MC-Unique: zReo-sa2PHK0cm1VX-3Vdw-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f54.google.com with SMTP id z20so76062353edc.13 for ; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 06:01:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=crOdWIptmZf8pxuA44UGy8HjdRzPcXaL0S7+PbsVXCw=; b=eGhblN2YZ6w4JpGcpouxdTAIiGqyZ5mywTgI6BvszELlJrw+y0+ys7BQ4CZyZ/NnGu OBfmxOj1Hfvr6GrAI9Jzrm1IyZ8p/4bdOuAVLweSrd2zJGc+rc4oKIzGO4ZgfTKCDMCC FVEWYmLnujoO5rE3UU+ohoTBbpcAR7eOfGdSUo12lE+0iJ7iY/apwn1DsYrAKliWH5Dj GmWZCPDwC+tDh/9rpX/uQ5Zb8oA1D+B+8Aa0LRHJNomTjgkR35ZyHhGCfd56R6WIbqUG XbX4VdLuyVNWJS7IaK3VOn7m8wK3FtV1T5M6jJ/bimNd2C/5ENq/otUbP87zhURG8L1y 6LxQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53041mN62IQc3SmRA0tg61CUkL04yLx3mSlpdWH18fpJ0gGYXJzK B6fgGBY8u83S3dtuQmnk/3QbhYE1K+ukc/ADCgLp X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwfePdaN+I1n/+fDRDVgSB4FkutIKTWIUcdi6y3Q8YAR349Lg21C8y1bXwdN/SMsY4c2WJKDKTVM3X2GC4+iXg= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:f90c:: with SMTP id lc12mr35950408ejb.104.1635858079376; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 06:01:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <163584790624.1845480.1785827913484538939.b4-ty@ellerman.id.au> In-Reply-To: <163584790624.1845480.1785827913484538939.b4-ty@ellerman.id.au> From: Paul Moore Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 09:01:08 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] powerpc/audit: Convert powerpc to AUDIT_ARCH_COMPAT_GENERIC To: patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au X-Mimecast-Impersonation-Protect: Policy=CLT - Impersonation Protection Definition; Similar Internal Domain=false; Similar Monitored External Domain=false; Custom External Domain=false; Mimecast External Domain=false; Newly Observed Domain=false; Internal User Name=false; Custom Display Name List=false; Reply-to Address Mismatch=false; Targeted Threat Dictionary=false; Mimecast Threat Dictionary=false; Custom Threat Dictionary=false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.11.54.2 X-loop: linux-audit@redhat.com Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christophe Leroy , linux-audit@redhat.com, Paul Mackerras , Eric Paris , Michael Ellerman , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-BeenThere: linux-audit@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk List-Id: Linux Audit Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 7:38 AM Michael Ellerman wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 13:36:13 +0000 (UTC), Christophe Leroy wrote: > > Commit e65e1fc2d24b ("[PATCH] syscall class hookup for all normal > > targets") added generic support for AUDIT but that didn't include > > support for bi-arch like powerpc. > > > > Commit 4b58841149dc ("audit: Add generic compat syscall support") > > added generic support for bi-arch. > > > > [...] > > Applied to powerpc/next. > > [1/1] powerpc/audit: Convert powerpc to AUDIT_ARCH_COMPAT_GENERIC > https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/566af8cda399c088763d07464463dc871c943b54 Did the test failure discussed earlier in this thread ever get resolved? If not, this really shouldn't be in linux-next IMO. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com -- Linux-audit mailing list Linux-audit@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit