linux-bcache.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Wheeler <bcache@lists.ewheeler.net>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
	Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/29] bcache: Convert to bdev_open_by_path()
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2023 18:06:01 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fd7fc9e-8d24-972-4b63-7eae3d2931e2@ewheeler.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230811110504.27514-9-jack@suse.cz>

On Fri, 11 Aug 2023, Jan Kara wrote:
> Convert bcache to use bdev_open_by_path() and pass the handle around.
> 
> CC: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org
> CC: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de
> CC: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> ---
>  drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h |  2 +
>  drivers/md/bcache/super.c  | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h b/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h
> index 5a79bb3c272f..2aa3f2c1f719 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h
> @@ -299,6 +299,7 @@ struct cached_dev {
>  	struct list_head	list;
>  	struct bcache_device	disk;
>  	struct block_device	*bdev;
> +	struct bdev_handle	*bdev_handle;

It looks like you've handled most if not all of the `block_device *bdev` 
refactor.  Can we drop `block_device *bdev` and fixup any remaining 
references?  More below.

>  
>  	struct cache_sb		sb;
>  	struct cache_sb_disk	*sb_disk;
> @@ -421,6 +422,7 @@ struct cache {
>  
>  	struct kobject		kobj;
>  	struct block_device	*bdev;
> +	struct bdev_handle	*bdev_handle;

ditto.

>  
>  	struct task_struct	*alloc_thread;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> index 0ae2b3676293..c11ac86be72b 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> @@ -1368,8 +1368,8 @@ static void cached_dev_free(struct closure *cl)
>  	if (dc->sb_disk)
>  		put_page(virt_to_page(dc->sb_disk));
>  
> -	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dc->bdev))
> -		blkdev_put(dc->bdev, dc);
> +	if (dc->bdev_handle)
> +		bdev_release(dc->bdev_handle);

bdev_release does not reset dc->bdev, which could leave a hanging 
reference.

>  
>  	wake_up(&unregister_wait);
>  
> @@ -1444,7 +1444,7 @@ static int cached_dev_init(struct cached_dev *dc, unsigned int block_size)
>  /* Cached device - bcache superblock */
>  
>  static int register_bdev(struct cache_sb *sb, struct cache_sb_disk *sb_disk,
> -				 struct block_device *bdev,
> +				 struct bdev_handle *bdev_handle,
>  				 struct cached_dev *dc)
>  {
>  	const char *err = "cannot allocate memory";
> @@ -1452,14 +1452,15 @@ static int register_bdev(struct cache_sb *sb, struct cache_sb_disk *sb_disk,
>  	int ret = -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	memcpy(&dc->sb, sb, sizeof(struct cache_sb));
> -	dc->bdev = bdev;
> +	dc->bdev_handle = bdev_handle;
> +	dc->bdev = bdev_handle->bdev;

If I understand correctly, this patch duplicates the dc->bdev reference to 
exist as dc->bdev_handle->bdev _and_ dc->bdev. (Same for changes related 
to `struct cache`.)

This would mean future developers have to understand they are the same 
thing, and someone may not manage it correctly.

If block core is moving to `struct bdev_handle`, then can we drop 
`dc->bdev` and replace all occurances of `dc->bdev` with 
`bdev_handle->bdev`?  Or make an accessor macro/function like 
bdev_handle_get_bdev(dc->bdev_handle)?

Unless I misunderstand something here, I would NACK this as written 
because it increases the liklihood of future developer error.  

I've added a few other comments below, but my comments are not exhaustive:

>  	dc->sb_disk = sb_disk;
>  
>  	if (cached_dev_init(dc, sb->block_size << 9))
>  		goto err;
>  
>  	err = "error creating kobject";
> -	if (kobject_add(&dc->disk.kobj, bdev_kobj(bdev), "bcache"))
> +	if (kobject_add(&dc->disk.kobj, bdev_kobj(dc->bdev), "bcache"))
>  		goto err;
>  	if (bch_cache_accounting_add_kobjs(&dc->accounting, &dc->disk.kobj))
>  		goto err;
> @@ -2216,8 +2217,8 @@ void bch_cache_release(struct kobject *kobj)
>  	if (ca->sb_disk)
>  		put_page(virt_to_page(ca->sb_disk));
>  
> -	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ca->bdev))
> -		blkdev_put(ca->bdev, ca);
> +	if (ca->bdev_handle)
> +		bdev_release(ca->bdev_handle);
>  

ca->bdev is not cleaned up

>  	kfree(ca);
>  	module_put(THIS_MODULE);
> @@ -2337,16 +2338,18 @@ static int cache_alloc(struct cache *ca)
>  }
>  
>  static int register_cache(struct cache_sb *sb, struct cache_sb_disk *sb_disk,
> -				struct block_device *bdev, struct cache *ca)
> +				struct bdev_handle *bdev_handle,
> +				struct cache *ca)
>  {
>  	const char *err = NULL; /* must be set for any error case */
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	memcpy(&ca->sb, sb, sizeof(struct cache_sb));
> -	ca->bdev = bdev;
> +	ca->bdev_handle = bdev_handle;
> +	ca->bdev = bdev_handle->bdev;
>  	ca->sb_disk = sb_disk;
>  
> -	if (bdev_max_discard_sectors((bdev)))
> +	if (bdev_max_discard_sectors((bdev_handle->bdev)))
>  		ca->discard = CACHE_DISCARD(&ca->sb);
>  
>  	ret = cache_alloc(ca);
> @@ -2354,10 +2357,10 @@ static int register_cache(struct cache_sb *sb, struct cache_sb_disk *sb_disk,
>  		/*
>  		 * If we failed here, it means ca->kobj is not initialized yet,
>  		 * kobject_put() won't be called and there is no chance to
> -		 * call blkdev_put() to bdev in bch_cache_release(). So we
> -		 * explicitly call blkdev_put() here.
> +		 * call bdev_release() to bdev in bch_cache_release(). So
> +		 * we explicitly call bdev_release() here.
>  		 */
> -		blkdev_put(bdev, ca);
> +		bdev_release(bdev_handle);

ca->bdev is not cleaned up

>  		if (ret == -ENOMEM)
>  			err = "cache_alloc(): -ENOMEM";
>  		else if (ret == -EPERM)
> @@ -2367,7 +2370,7 @@ static int register_cache(struct cache_sb *sb, struct cache_sb_disk *sb_disk,
>  		goto err;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (kobject_add(&ca->kobj, bdev_kobj(bdev), "bcache")) {
> +	if (kobject_add(&ca->kobj, bdev_kobj(bdev_handle->bdev), "bcache")) {
>  		err = "error calling kobject_add";
>  		ret = -ENOMEM;
>  		goto out;
> @@ -2382,14 +2385,14 @@ static int register_cache(struct cache_sb *sb, struct cache_sb_disk *sb_disk,
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> -	pr_info("registered cache device %pg\n", ca->bdev);
> +	pr_info("registered cache device %pg\n", ca->bdev_handle->bdev);
>  
>  out:
>  	kobject_put(&ca->kobj);
>  
>  err:
>  	if (err)
> -		pr_notice("error %pg: %s\n", ca->bdev, err);
> +		pr_notice("error %pg: %s\n", ca->bdev_handle->bdev, err);
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -2445,7 +2448,7 @@ struct async_reg_args {
>  	char *path;
>  	struct cache_sb *sb;
>  	struct cache_sb_disk *sb_disk;
> -	struct block_device *bdev;
> +	struct bdev_handle *bdev_handle;
>  	void *holder;
>  };
>  
> @@ -2456,8 +2459,8 @@ static void register_bdev_worker(struct work_struct *work)
>  		container_of(work, struct async_reg_args, reg_work.work);
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&bch_register_lock);
> -	if (register_bdev(args->sb, args->sb_disk, args->bdev, args->holder)
> -	    < 0)
> +	if (register_bdev(args->sb, args->sb_disk, args->bdev_handle,
> +			  args->holder) < 0)
>  		fail = true;
>  	mutex_unlock(&bch_register_lock);
>  
> @@ -2477,7 +2480,8 @@ static void register_cache_worker(struct work_struct *work)
>  		container_of(work, struct async_reg_args, reg_work.work);
>  
>  	/* blkdev_put() will be called in bch_cache_release() */
> -	if (register_cache(args->sb, args->sb_disk, args->bdev, args->holder))
> +	if (register_cache(args->sb, args->sb_disk, args->bdev_handle,
> +			   args->holder))
>  		fail = true;
>  
>  	if (fail)
> @@ -2514,7 +2518,7 @@ static ssize_t register_bcache(struct kobject *k, struct kobj_attribute *attr,
>  	char *path = NULL;
>  	struct cache_sb *sb;
>  	struct cache_sb_disk *sb_disk;
> -	struct block_device *bdev, *bdev2;
> +	struct bdev_handle *bdev_handle, *bdev_handle2;
>  	void *holder = NULL;
>  	ssize_t ret;
>  	bool async_registration = false;
> @@ -2547,15 +2551,15 @@ static ssize_t register_bcache(struct kobject *k, struct kobj_attribute *attr,
>  
>  	ret = -EINVAL;
>  	err = "failed to open device";
> -	bdev = blkdev_get_by_path(strim(path), BLK_OPEN_READ, NULL, NULL);
> -	if (IS_ERR(bdev))
> +	bdev_handle = bdev_open_by_path(strim(path), BLK_OPEN_READ, NULL, NULL);
> +	if (IS_ERR(bdev_handle))
>  		goto out_free_sb;
>  
>  	err = "failed to set blocksize";
> -	if (set_blocksize(bdev, 4096))
> +	if (set_blocksize(bdev_handle->bdev, 4096))
>  		goto out_blkdev_put;
>  
> -	err = read_super(sb, bdev, &sb_disk);
> +	err = read_super(sb, bdev_handle->bdev, &sb_disk);
>  	if (err)
>  		goto out_blkdev_put;
>  
> @@ -2567,13 +2571,13 @@ static ssize_t register_bcache(struct kobject *k, struct kobj_attribute *attr,
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Now reopen in exclusive mode with proper holder */
> -	bdev2 = blkdev_get_by_dev(bdev->bd_dev, BLK_OPEN_READ | BLK_OPEN_WRITE,
> -				  holder, NULL);
> -	blkdev_put(bdev, NULL);
> -	bdev = bdev2;
> -	if (IS_ERR(bdev)) {
> -		ret = PTR_ERR(bdev);
> -		bdev = NULL;
> +	bdev_handle2 = bdev_open_by_dev(bdev_handle->bdev->bd_dev,
> +			BLK_OPEN_READ | BLK_OPEN_WRITE, holder, NULL);
> +	bdev_release(bdev_handle);
> +	bdev_handle = bdev_handle2;
> +	if (IS_ERR(bdev_handle)) {
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(bdev_handle);
> +		bdev_handle = NULL;
>  		if (ret == -EBUSY) {
>  			dev_t dev;
>  
> @@ -2608,7 +2612,7 @@ static ssize_t register_bcache(struct kobject *k, struct kobj_attribute *attr,
>  		args->path	= path;
>  		args->sb	= sb;
>  		args->sb_disk	= sb_disk;
> -		args->bdev	= bdev;
> +		args->bdev_handle	= bdev_handle;
>  		args->holder	= holder;
>  		register_device_async(args);
>  		/* No wait and returns to user space */
> @@ -2617,14 +2621,14 @@ static ssize_t register_bcache(struct kobject *k, struct kobj_attribute *attr,
>  
>  	if (SB_IS_BDEV(sb)) {
>  		mutex_lock(&bch_register_lock);
> -		ret = register_bdev(sb, sb_disk, bdev, holder);
> +		ret = register_bdev(sb, sb_disk, bdev_handle, holder);
>  		mutex_unlock(&bch_register_lock);
>  		/* blkdev_put() will be called in cached_dev_free() */
>  		if (ret < 0)
>  			goto out_free_sb;
>  	} else {
>  		/* blkdev_put() will be called in bch_cache_release() */
> -		ret = register_cache(sb, sb_disk, bdev, holder);
> +		ret = register_cache(sb, sb_disk, bdev_handle, holder);
>  		if (ret)
>  			goto out_free_sb;
>  	}
> @@ -2640,8 +2644,8 @@ static ssize_t register_bcache(struct kobject *k, struct kobj_attribute *attr,
>  out_put_sb_page:
>  	put_page(virt_to_page(sb_disk));
>  out_blkdev_put:
> -	if (bdev)
> -		blkdev_put(bdev, holder);
> +	if (bdev_handle)
> +		bdev_release(bdev_handle);
>  out_free_sb:
>  	kfree(sb);
>  out_free_path:
> -- 
> 2.35.3
> 
> 


--
Eric Wheeler



  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-21  1:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-11 11:04 [PATCH v2 0/29] block: Make blkdev_get_by_*() return handle Jan Kara
2023-08-11 11:04 ` [PATCH 09/29] bcache: Convert to bdev_open_by_path() Jan Kara
2023-08-21  1:06   ` Eric Wheeler [this message]
2023-08-21 17:50     ` Jan Kara
2023-08-21 18:54       ` Eric Wheeler
2023-08-23 10:10         ` Coly Li
2023-08-11 12:27 ` [PATCH v2 0/29] block: Make blkdev_get_by_*() return handle Christoph Hellwig
2023-08-25  1:58 ` Al Viro
2023-08-25 13:47   ` Jan Kara
2023-08-26  2:28     ` Al Viro
2023-08-28 14:27       ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-08-28 13:20     ` Christian Brauner
2023-08-28 14:22     ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-08-23 10:48 [PATCH v3 " Jan Kara
2023-08-23 10:48 ` [PATCH 09/29] bcache: Convert to bdev_open_by_path() Jan Kara
2023-08-25 12:06   ` Christian Brauner
2023-09-27  9:34 ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fd7fc9e-8d24-972-4b63-7eae3d2931e2@ewheeler.net \
    --to=bcache@lists.ewheeler.net \
    --cc=colyli@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).