From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: re-introduce blk_mq_complete_request_sync
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 01:11:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <189a7d80-ff0f-e6b0-f8f0-b50dfdd028f8@grimberg.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201009043938.GC27356@T590>
>> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
>> index 8f4f29f18b8c..629b025685d1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
>> @@ -2177,7 +2177,7 @@ static void nvme_tcp_complete_timed_out(struct request *rq)
>> nvme_tcp_stop_queue(ctrl, nvme_tcp_queue_id(req->queue));
>> if (!blk_mq_request_completed(rq)) {
>> nvme_req(rq)->status = NVME_SC_HOST_ABORTED_CMD;
>> - blk_mq_complete_request(rq);
>> + blk_mq_complete_request_sync(rq);
>
> Or complete the request in the following way? Then one block layer API
> can be saved:
>
> blk_mq_complete_request_remote(rq);
> nvme_complete_rq(rq);
Not sure I follow, how does this work?
Anyways, I think that blk_mq_complete_request_sync is a clean
and useful interface. We can do it in nvme but I don't think
it would be better.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-09 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-08 21:37 [PATCH] block: re-introduce blk_mq_complete_request_sync Sagi Grimberg
2020-10-09 4:39 ` Ming Lei
2020-10-09 5:03 ` Yi Zhang
2020-10-09 8:09 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-10-09 13:55 ` Yi Zhang
2020-10-09 18:29 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-10-10 6:08 ` Yi Zhang
2020-10-12 3:59 ` Chao Leng
2020-10-12 8:13 ` Ming Lei
2020-10-12 9:06 ` Chao Leng
2020-10-13 22:36 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-10-14 1:08 ` Ming Lei
2020-10-14 1:37 ` Chao Leng
2020-10-14 2:02 ` Ming Lei
2020-10-14 2:32 ` Chao Leng
2020-10-14 2:41 ` Chao Leng
2020-10-14 3:34 ` Ming Lei
2020-10-14 9:39 ` Chao Leng
2020-10-14 9:56 ` Ming Lei
2020-10-15 6:05 ` Chao Leng
2020-10-15 7:50 ` Ming Lei
2020-10-15 10:05 ` Chao Leng
2020-10-14 1:32 ` Chao Leng
2020-10-13 22:31 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-10-14 1:25 ` Chao Leng
2020-10-09 8:11 ` Sagi Grimberg [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=189a7d80-ff0f-e6b0-f8f0-b50dfdd028f8@grimberg.me \
--to=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).