linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
	John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Don Brace <don.brace@microsemi.com>,
	Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>,
	Sathya Prakash <sathya.prakash@broadcom.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2 5/5] blk-mq: Wait for for hctx inflight requests on CPU unplug
Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 23:02:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190527150207.11372-6-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190527150207.11372-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>

Managed interrupts can not migrate affinity when their CPUs are offline.
If the CPU is allowed to shutdown before they're returned, commands
dispatched to managed queues won't be able to complete through their
irq handlers.

Wait in cpu hotplug handler until all inflight requests on the tags
are completed or timeout. Wait once for each tags, so we can save time
in case of shared tags.

Based on the following patch from Keith, and use simple delay-spin
instead.

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20190405215920.27085-1-keith.busch@intel.com/

Some SCSI devices may have single blk_mq hw queue and multiple private
completion queues, and wait until all requests on the private completion
queue are completed.

Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
 block/blk-mq-tag.c |  2 +-
 block/blk-mq-tag.h |  5 +++
 block/blk-mq.c     | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 3 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
index 7513c8eaabee..b24334f99c5d 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
@@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ static void bt_tags_for_each(struct blk_mq_tags *tags, struct sbitmap_queue *bt,
  *		true to continue iterating tags, false to stop.
  * @priv:	Will be passed as second argument to @fn.
  */
-static void blk_mq_all_tag_busy_iter(struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
+void blk_mq_all_tag_busy_iter(struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
 		busy_tag_iter_fn *fn, void *priv)
 {
 	if (tags->nr_reserved_tags)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.h b/block/blk-mq-tag.h
index 61deab0b5a5a..9ce7606a87f0 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-tag.h
+++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.h
@@ -19,6 +19,9 @@ struct blk_mq_tags {
 	struct request **rqs;
 	struct request **static_rqs;
 	struct list_head page_list;
+
+#define BLK_MQ_TAGS_DRAINED           0
+	unsigned long flags;
 };
 
 
@@ -35,6 +38,8 @@ extern int blk_mq_tag_update_depth(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 extern void blk_mq_tag_wakeup_all(struct blk_mq_tags *tags, bool);
 void blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter(struct request_queue *q, busy_iter_fn *fn,
 		void *priv);
+void blk_mq_all_tag_busy_iter(struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
+		busy_tag_iter_fn *fn, void *priv);
 
 static inline struct sbq_wait_state *bt_wait_ptr(struct sbitmap_queue *bt,
 						 struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 32b8ad3d341b..ab1fbfd48374 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -2215,6 +2215,65 @@ int blk_mq_alloc_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
 	return -ENOMEM;
 }
 
+static int blk_mq_hctx_notify_prepare(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
+{
+	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx	*hctx =
+		hlist_entry_safe(node, struct blk_mq_hw_ctx, cpuhp_dead);
+
+	if (hctx->tags)
+		clear_bit(BLK_MQ_TAGS_DRAINED, &hctx->tags->flags);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+struct blk_mq_inflight_rq_data {
+	unsigned cnt;
+	const struct cpumask *cpumask;
+};
+
+static bool blk_mq_count_inflight_rq(struct request *rq, void *data,
+				     bool reserved)
+{
+	struct blk_mq_inflight_rq_data *count = data;
+
+	if ((blk_mq_rq_state(rq) == MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT) &&
+			cpumask_test_cpu(blk_mq_rq_cpu(rq), count->cpumask))
+		count->cnt++;
+
+	return true;
+}
+
+unsigned blk_mq_tags_inflight_rqs(struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
+		const struct cpumask *completion_cpus)
+{
+	struct blk_mq_inflight_rq_data data = {
+		.cnt = 0,
+		.cpumask = completion_cpus,
+	};
+
+	blk_mq_all_tag_busy_iter(tags, blk_mq_count_inflight_rq, &data);
+
+	return data.cnt;
+}
+
+static void blk_mq_drain_inflight_rqs(struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
+		const struct cpumask *completion_cpus)
+{
+	if (!tags)
+		return;
+
+	/* Can't apply the optimization in case of private completion queues */
+	if (completion_cpus == cpu_all_mask &&
+			test_and_set_bit(BLK_MQ_TAGS_DRAINED, &tags->flags))
+		return;
+
+	while (1) {
+		if (!blk_mq_tags_inflight_rqs(tags, completion_cpus))
+			break;
+		msleep(5);
+	}
+}
+
 /*
  * 'cpu' is going away. splice any existing rq_list entries from this
  * software queue to the hw queue dispatch list, and ensure that it
@@ -2226,6 +2285,8 @@ static int blk_mq_hctx_notify_dead(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
 	struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx;
 	LIST_HEAD(tmp);
 	enum hctx_type type;
+	struct request_queue *q;
+	const struct cpumask *cpumask = NULL, *completion_cpus;
 
 	hctx = hlist_entry_safe(node, struct blk_mq_hw_ctx, cpuhp_dead);
 	ctx = __blk_mq_get_ctx(hctx->queue, cpu);
@@ -2238,14 +2299,32 @@ static int blk_mq_hctx_notify_dead(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
 
-	if (list_empty(&tmp))
-		return 0;
+	if (!list_empty(&tmp)) {
+		spin_lock(&hctx->lock);
+		list_splice_tail_init(&tmp, &hctx->dispatch);
+		spin_unlock(&hctx->lock);
 
-	spin_lock(&hctx->lock);
-	list_splice_tail_init(&tmp, &hctx->dispatch);
-	spin_unlock(&hctx->lock);
+		blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, true);
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Interrupt for the current completion queue will be shutdown, so
+	 * wait until all requests on this queue are completed.
+	 */
+	q = hctx->queue;
+	if (q->mq_ops->complete_queue_affinity)
+		cpumask = q->mq_ops->complete_queue_affinity(hctx, cpu);
+
+	if (!cpumask) {
+		cpumask = hctx->cpumask;
+		completion_cpus = cpu_all_mask;
+	} else {
+		completion_cpus = cpumask;
+	}
+
+	if (cpumask_first_and(cpumask, cpu_online_mask) >= nr_cpu_ids)
+		blk_mq_drain_inflight_rqs(hctx->tags, completion_cpus);
 
-	blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, true);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -3541,7 +3620,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_rq_cpu);
 
 static int __init blk_mq_init(void)
 {
-	cpuhp_setup_state_multi(CPUHP_BLK_MQ_DEAD, "block/mq:dead", NULL,
+	cpuhp_setup_state_multi(CPUHP_BLK_MQ_DEAD, "block/mq:dead",
+				blk_mq_hctx_notify_prepare,
 				blk_mq_hctx_notify_dead);
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.20.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-27 15:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-27 15:02 [PATCH V2 0/5] blk-mq: Wait for for hctx inflight requests on CPU unplug Ming Lei
2019-05-27 15:02 ` [PATCH V2 1/5] scsi: select reply queue from request's CPU Ming Lei
2019-05-28  5:43   ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-05-28 10:33   ` John Garry
2019-05-29  2:36     ` Ming Lei
2019-05-27 15:02 ` [PATCH V2 2/5] blk-mq: introduce .complete_queue_affinity Ming Lei
2019-05-27 15:02 ` [PATCH V2 3/5] scsi: core: implement callback of .complete_queue_affinity Ming Lei
2019-05-27 15:02 ` [PATCH V2 4/5] scsi: implement .complete_queue_affinity Ming Lei
2019-05-27 15:02 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2019-05-28 16:50   ` [PATCH V2 5/5] blk-mq: Wait for for hctx inflight requests on CPU unplug John Garry
2019-05-29  2:28     ` Ming Lei
2019-05-29  2:42       ` Ming Lei
2019-05-29  9:42         ` John Garry
2019-05-29 10:10           ` Ming Lei
2019-05-29 15:33             ` Ming Lei
2019-05-29 16:10               ` John Garry
2019-05-30  2:28                 ` Ming Lei
2019-05-30  4:11                   ` Ming Lei
2019-05-30  9:31                   ` John Garry
2019-05-30  9:45                     ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190527150207.11372-6-ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=don.brace@microsemi.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=sathya.prakash@broadcom.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).