From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
keith.busch@intel.com, hch@lst.de, sagi@grimberg.me,
shlomin@mellanox.com, israelr@mellanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] block: centralize PI remapping logic to the block layer
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 13:43:48 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190904194347.GH21302@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1567614452-26251-1-git-send-email-maxg@mellanox.com>
On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 07:27:32PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> + if (blk_integrity_rq(req) && req_op(req) == REQ_OP_READ &&
> + error == BLK_STS_OK)
> + t10_pi_complete(req,
> + nr_bytes >> blk_integrity_interval_shift(req->q));
This is not created by your patch, but while reviewing it, I noticed
we're corrupting metadata for TYPE0. Even if there's no in-kernel use
for accessing this data, changing it is still wrong.
Perhaps these t10_pi complete/prepare functions should be part of the
integrity profile like generate_fn/verify_fn.
Or as a quicker fix, we could exclude type0 like below:
---
@@ -246,7 +247,8 @@ void t10_pi_complete(struct request *rq, u8 protection_type,
u32 ref_tag = t10_pi_ref_tag(rq);
struct bio *bio;
- if (protection_type == T10_PI_TYPE3_PROTECTION)
+ if (protection_type == T10_PI_TYPE0_PROTECTION ||
+ protection_type == T10_PI_TYPE3_PROTECTION)
return;
__rq_for_each_bio(bio, rq) {
--
2.14.5
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-04 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-04 16:27 [PATCH v2 1/1] block: centralize PI remapping logic to the block layer Max Gurtovoy
2019-09-04 17:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-09-04 19:43 ` Keith Busch [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190904194347.GH21302@localhost.localdomain \
--to=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=israelr@mellanox.com \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=maxg@mellanox.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=shlomin@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).