linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
	keith.busch@intel.com, tj@kernel.org, zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: fix null pointer dereference in blk_mq_rq_timed_out()
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 18:07:56 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190912100755.GB9897@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d3549c6d-ca07-efa9-af15-7cee61ce5ff2@huawei.com>

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 04:49:15PM +0800, Yufen Yu wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2019/9/12 12:16, Ming Lei wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 11:29:18AM +0800, Yufen Yu wrote:
> > > 
> > > On 2019/9/12 10:46, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Sep 07, 2019 at 06:24:50PM +0800, Yufen Yu wrote:
> > > > > There is a race condition between timeout check and completion for
> > > > > flush request as follow:
> > > > > 
> > > > > timeout_work    issue flush      issue flush
> > > > >                   blk_insert_flush
> > > > >                                    blk_insert_flush
> > > > > blk_mq_timeout_work
> > > > >                   blk_kick_flush
> > > > > 
> > > > > blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter
> > > > > blk_mq_check_expired(flush_rq)
> > > > > 
> > > > >                   __blk_mq_end_request
> > > > >                  flush_end_io
> > > > >                  blk_kick_flush
> > > > >                  blk_rq_init(flush_rq)
> > > > >                  memset(flush_rq, 0)
> > > > Not see there is memset(flush_rq, 0) in block/blk-flush.c
> > > Call path as follow:
> > > 
> > > blk_kick_flush
> > >      blk_rq_init
> > >          memset(rq, 0, sizeof(*rq));
> > Looks I miss this one in blk_rq_init(), sorry for that.
> > 
> > Given there are only two users of blk_rq_init(), one simple fix could be
> > not clearing queue in blk_rq_init(), something like below?
> > 
> > diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> > index 77807a5d7f9e..25e6a045c821 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-core.c
> > +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> > @@ -107,7 +107,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_queue_flag_test_and_set);
> >   void blk_rq_init(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
> >   {
> > -	memset(rq, 0, sizeof(*rq));
> > +	const int offset = offsetof(struct request, q);
> > +
> > +	memset((void *)rq + offset, 0, sizeof(*rq) - offset);
> >   	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->queuelist);
> >   	rq->q = q;
> > diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> > index 1ac790178787..382e71b8787d 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> > @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ enum mq_rq_state {
> >    * especially blk_mq_rq_ctx_init() to take care of the added fields.
> >    */
> >   struct request {
> > -	struct request_queue *q;
> > +	struct request_queue *q;	/* Must be the 1st field */
> >   	struct blk_mq_ctx *mq_ctx;
> >   	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *mq_hctx;
> 
> Not set req->q as '0' can just avoid BUG_ON for NULL pointer deference.
> 
> However, the root problem is that 'flush_rq' have been reused while
> timeout function handle it currently. That means mq_ops->timeout() may
> access old values remained by the last flush request and make the wrong
> decision.
> 
> Take the race condition in the patch as an example.
> 
> blk_mq_check_expired
>     blk_mq_rq_timed_out
>         req->q->mq_ops->timeout  // Driver timeout handle may read old data
>     refcount_dec_and_test(&rq)
>     __blk_mq_free_request   // If rq have been reset has '1' in
> blk_rq_init(), it will be free here.
> 
> So, I think we should solve this problem completely. Just like normal
> request,
> we can prevent flush request to call end_io when timeout handle the request.

Seems it isn't specific for 'flush_rq', and it should be one generic issue
for any request which implements .end_io.

For requests without defining .end_io, rq->ref is applied for protecting
its lifetime. However, rq->end_io() is still called even if rq->ref doesn't
drop to zero.

If the above is correct, we need to let rq->ref to cover rq->end_io().


Thanks,
Ming

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-12 10:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-07 10:24 [PATCH] block: fix null pointer dereference in blk_mq_rq_timed_out() Yufen Yu
2019-09-12  2:46 ` Ming Lei
2019-09-12  3:29   ` Yufen Yu
2019-09-12  4:16     ` Ming Lei
2019-09-12  8:49       ` Yufen Yu
2019-09-12 10:07         ` Ming Lei [this message]
2019-09-16  2:40           ` Yufen Yu
2019-09-16  9:27           ` Yufen Yu
2019-09-17  0:50             ` Ming Lei
2019-09-12  8:59     ` Guoqing Jiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190912100755.GB9897@ming.t460p \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuyufen@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).