linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Chao Leng <lengchao@huawei.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/4] nvme: tcp: complete non-IO requests atomically
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 09:22:41 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201021012241.GC1571548@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e1d53ce3-ea27-439e-5e7a-ba790742908e@huawei.com>

On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 05:04:29PM +0800, Chao Leng wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2020/10/20 16:53, Ming Lei wrote:
> > During controller's CONNECTING state, admin/fabric/connect requests
> > are submitted for recovery controller, and we allow to abort this request
> > directly in time out handler for not blocking setup procedure.
> > 
> > So timout vs. normal completion race exists on these requests since
> > admin/fabirc/connect queues won't be shutdown before handling timeout
> > during CONNECTING state.
> > 
> > Add atomic completion for requests from connect/fabric/admin queue for
> > avoiding the race.
> > 
> > CC: Chao Leng <lengchao@huawei.com>
> > Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
> > Reported-by: Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>
> > Tested-by: Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >   1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
> > index d6a3e1487354..7e85bd4a8d1b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
> > @@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ static int so_priority;
> >   module_param(so_priority, int, 0644);
> >   MODULE_PARM_DESC(so_priority, "nvme tcp socket optimize priority");
> > +#define REQ_STATE_COMPLETE     0
> > +
> >   enum nvme_tcp_send_state {
> >   	NVME_TCP_SEND_CMD_PDU = 0,
> >   	NVME_TCP_SEND_H2C_PDU,
> > @@ -56,6 +58,8 @@ struct nvme_tcp_request {
> >   	size_t			offset;
> >   	size_t			data_sent;
> >   	enum nvme_tcp_send_state state;
> > +
> > +	unsigned long		comp_state;
> I do not think adding state is a good idea.
> It is similar to rq->state.
> In the teardown process, after quiesced queues delete the timer and
> cancel the timeout work maybe a better option.
> I will send the patch later.
> The patch is already tested with roce more than one week.

Actually there isn't race between timeout and teardown, and patch 1 and patch
2 are enough to fix the issue reported by Yi.

It is just that rq->state is updated to IDLE in its. complete(), so
either one of code paths may think that this rq isn't completed, and
patch 2 has addressed this issue.

In short, teardown lock is enough to cover the race.


Thanks,
Ming


  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-21  1:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-20  8:52 [PATCH V2 0/4] blk-mq/nvme-tcp: fix timed out related races Ming Lei
2020-10-20  8:52 ` [PATCH V2 1/4] blk-mq: check rq->state explicitly in blk_mq_tagset_count_completed_rqs Ming Lei
2020-10-20  8:52 ` [PATCH V2 2/4] blk-mq: fix blk_mq_request_completed Ming Lei
2020-10-20  8:53 ` [PATCH V2 3/4] nvme: tcp: complete non-IO requests atomically Ming Lei
2020-10-20  9:04   ` Chao Leng
2020-10-21  1:22     ` Ming Lei [this message]
2020-10-21  2:20       ` Chao Leng
2020-10-21  2:55         ` Ming Lei
2020-10-21  3:14           ` Chao Leng
2020-10-20  8:53 ` [PATCH V2 4/4] nvme: tcp: fix race between timeout and normal completion Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201021012241.GC1571548@T590 \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=lengchao@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=yi.zhang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).