From: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
To: Wen Xiong <wenxiong@us.ibm.com>
Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
hare@suse.de, hch@lst.de, john.garry@huawei.com,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, sagi@grimberg.me,
tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 0/3] blk-mq: fix blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 19:06:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210726170659.hrh4evhkdqnyjz5k@beryllium.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF2C4681CD.AF20CBB4-ON0025871E.004D37B6-0025871E.004E3B9F@ibm.com>
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 02:14:30PM +0000, Wen Xiong wrote:
> >>V6 is basically same with V4, can you figure out where the failure
> >>comes?(v5.14-rc2, V6 or Daniel's V3)
>
> Looks 3/3 was not patched cleanly in v5.14-rc2 last week. I made the changes
> in block/blk-mq.c.rej manually but still missed the last part of 3/3 patch.
Sorry for the long delay on my side. It took a while to get my test
setup running again. The qla2xxx driver really doesn't like 'fast'
remote port toggling. But that's a different story.
Anyway, it turns out that my patch series is still not working
correctly. When I tested the series I deliberate forced to execute
the 'revising io queue count' path in nvme_fc_recreate_io_queues by
doing:
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c
@@ -2954,7 +2954,7 @@ nvme_fc_recreate_io_queues(struct nvme_fc_ctrl *ctrl)
if (ctrl->ctrl.queue_count == 1)
return 0;
- if (prior_ioq_cnt != nr_io_queues) {
+ if (prior_ioq_cnt != nr_io_queues - 1) {
dev_info(ctrl->ctrl.device,
"reconnect: revising io queue count from %d to %d\n",
prior_ioq_cnt, nr_io_queues);
With this change I can't observe any I/O hanging. Without the change it
hangs in the first iteration.
In Wen's setup we observed in earlier debugging sessions that the
nr_io_queues does change. So this explains why Wen doesn't see any
hanging I/Os.
@James, I think we need to look at bit more at the freeze code. BTW,
my initial patch which just added a nvme_start_freeze() in
nvme_fc_delete_association() doesn't work either for the 'prior_ioq_cnt
== nr_io_queues' case.
So I think Ming series can be merged as the hanging I/Os are clearly not
caused by the series.
Feel free to add
Tested-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
Thanks,
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-26 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-22 9:52 [PATCH V6 0/3] blk-mq: fix blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx Ming Lei
2021-07-22 9:52 ` [PATCH V6 1/3] genirq: add device_has_managed_msi_irq Ming Lei
2021-07-22 13:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-22 9:52 ` [PATCH V6 2/3] blk-mq: mark if one queue map uses managed irq Ming Lei
2021-07-22 13:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-22 15:40 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-22 16:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-22 9:52 ` [PATCH V6 3/3] blk-mq: don't deactivate hctx if managed irq isn't used Ming Lei
2021-08-18 9:38 ` John Garry
2021-08-18 10:32 ` Ming Lei
2021-07-22 13:12 ` [PATCH V6 0/3] blk-mq: fix blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx Daniel Wagner
[not found] ` <OFDADF39F5.DDB99A55-ON0025871A.00794382-0025871A.00797A2E@ibm.com>
2021-07-23 8:16 ` Ming Lei
[not found] ` <OF2C4681CD.AF20CBB4-ON0025871E.004D37B6-0025871E.004E3B9F@ibm.com>
2021-07-26 17:06 ` Daniel Wagner [this message]
2021-08-18 9:11 ` Daniel Wagner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210726170659.hrh4evhkdqnyjz5k@beryllium.lan \
--to=dwagner@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wenxiong@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).