From: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
"Bart Van Assche" <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: Wait for for hctx inflight requests on CPU unplug
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 14:50:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6e1d3b66-aaed-4f6f-da34-92a633ff4b44@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190517091424.19751-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
On 17/05/2019 10:14, Ming Lei wrote:
> Managed interrupts can not migrate affinity when their CPUs are offline.
> If the CPU is allowed to shutdown before they're returned, commands
> dispatched to managed queues won't be able to complete through their
> irq handlers.
>
> Wait in cpu hotplug handler until all inflight requests on the tags
> are completed or timeout. Wait once for each tags, so we can save time
> in case of shared tags.
>
> Based on the following patch from Keith, and use simple delay-spin
> instead.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20190405215920.27085-1-keith.busch@intel.com/
>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
> Cc: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
> Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/blk-mq-tag.c | 2 +-
> block/blk-mq-tag.h | 5 ++++
> block/blk-mq.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> index 7513c8eaabee..b24334f99c5d 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> @@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ static void bt_tags_for_each(struct blk_mq_tags *tags, struct sbitmap_queue *bt,
> * true to continue iterating tags, false to stop.
> * @priv: Will be passed as second argument to @fn.
> */
> -static void blk_mq_all_tag_busy_iter(struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
> +void blk_mq_all_tag_busy_iter(struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
> busy_tag_iter_fn *fn, void *priv)
> {
> if (tags->nr_reserved_tags)
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.h b/block/blk-mq-tag.h
> index 61deab0b5a5a..f8de50485b42 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-tag.h
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,9 @@ struct blk_mq_tags {
> struct request **rqs;
> struct request **static_rqs;
> struct list_head page_list;
> +
> + #define BLK_MQ_TAGS_DRAINED 0
> + unsigned long flags;
> };
>
>
> @@ -35,6 +38,8 @@ extern int blk_mq_tag_update_depth(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> extern void blk_mq_tag_wakeup_all(struct blk_mq_tags *tags, bool);
> void blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter(struct request_queue *q, busy_iter_fn *fn,
> void *priv);
> +void blk_mq_all_tag_busy_iter(struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
> + busy_tag_iter_fn *fn, void *priv);
>
> static inline struct sbq_wait_state *bt_wait_ptr(struct sbitmap_queue *bt,
> struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 08a6248d8536..d1d1b1a9628f 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -2214,6 +2214,60 @@ int blk_mq_alloc_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> +static int blk_mq_hctx_notify_prepare(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
> +{
> + struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
> + struct blk_mq_tags *tags;
> +
> + hctx = hlist_entry_safe(node, struct blk_mq_hw_ctx, cpuhp_dead);
> + tags = hctx->tags;
> +
> + if (tags)
> + clear_bit(BLK_MQ_TAGS_DRAINED, &tags->flags);
> +
Hi Ming,
Thanks for the effort here.
I would like to make an assertion on a related topic, which I hope you
can comment on:
For this drain mechanism to work, the blk_mq_hw_ctx’s (and related cpu
masks) for a request queue are required to match the hw queues used in
the LLDD (if using managed interrupts).
In others words, a SCSI LLDD needs to expose all hw queues for this to work.
The reason I say this is because if the LLDD does not expose the hw
queues and manages them internally - as some SCSI LLDDs do - yet uses
managed interrupts to spread the hw queue MSI vectors across all CPUs,
then we still only have a single blk_mq_hw_ctx per rq with a cpumask
covering all cpus, which is not what we would want.
Cheers,
John
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static bool blk_mq_count_inflight_rq(struct request *rq, void *data,
> + bool reserved)
> +{
> + if (blk_mq_rq_state(rq) == MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT)
> + (*(unsigned long *)data)++;
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned blk_mq_tags_inflight_rqs(struct blk_mq_tags *tags)
> +{
> + unsigned long cnt = 0;
> +
> + blk_mq_all_tag_busy_iter(tags, blk_mq_count_inflight_rq, &cnt);
> +
> + return cnt;
> +}
> +
> +static void blk_mq_drain_inflight_rqs(struct blk_mq_tags *tags, int dead_cpu)
> +{
> + unsigned long msecs_left = 1000 * 5;
> +
> + if (!tags)
> + return;
> +
> + if (test_and_set_bit(BLK_MQ_TAGS_DRAINED, &tags->flags))
> + return;
> +
> + while (msecs_left > 0) {
> + if (!blk_mq_tags_inflight_rqs(tags))
> + break;
> + msleep(5);
> + msecs_left -= 5;
> + }
> +
> + if (msecs_left > 0)
> + printk(KERN_WARNING "requests not completed from dead "
> + "CPU %d\n", dead_cpu);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * 'cpu' is going away. splice any existing rq_list entries from this
> * software queue to the hw queue dispatch list, and ensure that it
> @@ -2245,6 +2299,14 @@ static int blk_mq_hctx_notify_dead(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
> spin_unlock(&hctx->lock);
>
> blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, true);
> +
> + /*
> + * Interrupt for this queue will be shutdown, so wait until all
> + * requests from this hw queue is done or timeout.
> + */
> + if (cpumask_first_and(hctx->cpumask, cpu_online_mask) >= nr_cpu_ids)
> + blk_mq_drain_inflight_rqs(hctx->tags, cpu);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -3540,7 +3602,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_rq_cpu);
>
> static int __init blk_mq_init(void)
> {
> - cpuhp_setup_state_multi(CPUHP_BLK_MQ_DEAD, "block/mq:dead", NULL,
> + cpuhp_setup_state_multi(CPUHP_BLK_MQ_DEAD, "block/mq:dead",
> + blk_mq_hctx_notify_prepare,
> blk_mq_hctx_notify_dead);
> return 0;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-21 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-17 9:14 [PATCH] blk-mq: Wait for for hctx inflight requests on CPU unplug Ming Lei
2019-05-21 7:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-21 8:03 ` Ming Lei
2019-05-21 13:50 ` John Garry [this message]
2019-05-22 1:56 ` Ming Lei
2019-05-22 9:06 ` John Garry
2019-05-22 9:47 ` Hannes Reinecke
2019-05-22 10:31 ` Ming Lei
2019-05-22 12:30 ` John Garry
2019-05-22 10:01 ` Ming Lei
2019-05-22 12:21 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6e1d3b66-aaed-4f6f-da34-92a633ff4b44@huawei.com \
--to=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).