linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	<linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, Yanhui Ma <yama@redhat.com>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	<kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>,
	chenxiang <chenxiang66@hisilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: plug request for shared sbitmap
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 13:37:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7f985b61-fd26-0f90-14ab-d4c857f7851c@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <108caf1d-c31d-2303-57a8-8fe0f7bde22b@suse.de>

On 18/05/2021 12:54, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> In yanhui's virt workload(qemu, libaio, dio, high queue depth, single
>> job), the patch can improve throughput much(>50%) when running
>> sequential write(dio, libaio, 16 jobs) to XFS. And it is observed that
>> IO merge is recovered to level of disabling host tags.
>>
> I've found a good testcase for this by using null_blk:
> 
> modprobe null_blk submit_queues=32 queue_mode=2 irqmode=0 bs=4096
> hw_queue_depth=2048 completion_nsec=1 nr_devices=4 shared_tags=1
> shared_tag_bitmap=1
> 
> and using a simple fio job with libaio and rw=read and numjobs=32 will
> do the trick:
> 
> [nullb]
> rw=read
> size=16g
> ioengine=libaio
> direct=1
> buffered=0
> group_reporting=1
> bs=4096
> numjobs=32
> 
> (of course, the 'numjobs' and 'submit_queues' parameter would need to be
> adjusted to your machine).
> Omitting the 'shared_tag_bitmap' module parameter would yield around 12M
> iops; adding it would see a rather dramatic drop to 172k iops.
> With this patchset it's back to the expected iops value.

I will consider running this test myself, but do you mean that you get 
~12M with shared_tag_bitmap=1 and this patch?

I would always expect shared_tag_bitmap=1 to give a drop for null_blk, 
as we move from per-submit queue driver tag to all submit queues sharing 
the same driver tagset.

And I am not sure if you are fixing the IO sched from default.

Thanks,
John

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-18 12:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-14  2:20 [PATCH] blk-mq: plug request for shared sbitmap Ming Lei
2021-05-14 14:59 ` Jens Axboe
2021-05-18  9:44 ` John Garry
2021-05-18 11:16   ` Ming Lei
2021-05-18 11:42     ` John Garry
2021-05-18 12:00       ` Ming Lei
2021-05-18 12:51         ` John Garry
2021-05-18 16:01           ` John Garry
2021-05-19  0:21             ` Ming Lei
2021-05-19  8:41               ` John Garry
2021-05-20  1:23                 ` Ming Lei
2021-05-20  8:21                   ` John Garry
2021-05-18 11:54     ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-05-18 12:37       ` John Garry [this message]
2021-05-18 13:22         ` Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7f985b61-fd26-0f90-14ab-d4c857f7851c@huawei.com \
    --to=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=chenxiang66@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=yama@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).