From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] block: split bio_queue_enter from blk_queue_enter
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 20:25:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dc7ee301-f3d4-e8dd-3dd5-f0d6c9200048@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210920112405.1299667-3-hch@lst.de>
On 9/20/21 04:24, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> To prepare for fixing a gendisk shutdown race, open code the
> blk_queue_enter logic in bio_queue_enter. This also remove the
^^^^^^
removes
> pointless flags translation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> block/blk-core.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index 4c078681f39b8..be7cd1819b605 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -475,18 +475,32 @@ int blk_queue_enter(struct request_queue *q, blk_mq_req_flags_t flags)
> static inline int bio_queue_enter(struct bio *bio)
> {
> struct request_queue *q = bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk->queue;
> - bool nowait = bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT;
> - int ret;
>
> - ret = blk_queue_enter(q, nowait ? BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT : 0);
> - if (unlikely(ret)) {
> - if (nowait && !blk_queue_dying(q))
> + while (!blk_try_enter_queue(q, false)) {
> + if (bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT) {
> bio_wouldblock_error(bio);
> - else
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * read pair of barrier in blk_freeze_queue_start(), we need to
> + * order reading __PERCPU_REF_DEAD flag of .q_usage_counter and
> + * reading .mq_freeze_depth or queue dying flag, otherwise the
> + * following wait may never return if the two reads are
> + * reordered.
> + */
> + smp_rmb();
> + wait_event(q->mq_freeze_wq,
> + (!q->mq_freeze_depth &&
> + blk_pm_resume_queue(false, q)) ||
> + blk_queue_dying(q));
> + if (blk_queue_dying(q)) {
> bio_io_error(bio);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> }
>
> - return ret;
> + return 0;
This patch changes the behavior of bio_queue_enter(). I think that
preserving the existing behavior implies testing blk_queue_dying(q)
before checking the REQ_NOWAIT flag.
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-21 3:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-20 11:24 tear down file system I/O in del_gendisk Christoph Hellwig
2021-09-20 11:24 ` [PATCH 1/4] block: factor out a blk_try_enter_queue helper Christoph Hellwig
2021-09-21 3:17 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-09-20 11:24 ` [PATCH 2/4] block: split bio_queue_enter from blk_queue_enter Christoph Hellwig
2021-09-21 3:25 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2021-09-20 11:24 ` [PATCH 3/4] block: drain file system I/O on del_gendisk Christoph Hellwig
2021-09-20 11:24 ` [PATCH 4/4] block: keep q_usage_counter in atomic mode after del_gendisk Christoph Hellwig
2021-09-21 3:29 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-09-21 9:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-09-21 3:38 ` tear down file system I/O in del_gendisk Bart Van Assche
2021-09-21 9:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-09-21 14:24 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-09-21 22:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-09-22 17:22 tear down file system I/O in del_gendisk v2 Christoph Hellwig
2021-09-22 17:22 ` [PATCH 2/4] block: split bio_queue_enter from blk_queue_enter Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dc7ee301-f3d4-e8dd-3dd5-f0d6c9200048@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).