From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Niklas Cassel <Niklas.Cassel@wdc.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
Adam Manzanares <a.manzanares@samsung.com>,
Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com>,
Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 16/16] block/mq-deadline: Prioritize high-priority requests
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 16:38:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e94f62c4-a329-398d-5003-d369506d7f89@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YSA1JWt9soMSs23Z@x1-carbon>
On 8/20/21 4:05 PM, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> Thank you for your patch!
> I tested it, and it does solve my problem.
That's quick. Thanks!
> I've been thinking more about this problem.
> The problem is seen on a SATA zoned drive.
>
> These drives have mq-deadline set as default by the
> blk_queue_required_elevator_features(q, ELEVATOR_F_ZBD_SEQ_WRITE) call in
> drivers/scsi/sd_zbc.c:sd_zbc_read_zones()
>
> This triggers block/elevator.c:elevator_init_mq() to initialize
> "mq-deadline" as default scheduler for these devices.
>
> I think that the problem might because that drivers/scsi/sd_zbc.c
> has created the request_queue and submitted requests, before the call
> to elevator_init_mq() is done.
>
> elevator_init_mq() will set q->elevator->type->ops, so once that is set,
> blk_mq_free_request() will call e->type->ops.finish_request(rq),
> regardless if the request was inserted through the recently initialized
> scheduler or not.
>
> While I'm perfectly happy with your fix, would it perhaps be possible
> to do the fix in block/elevator.c instead, so that we don't need to
> do the same type of check that you did, in each and every single
> io scheduler?
>
> Looking at block/elevator.c:elevator_init_mq(), it seems to do:
>
> blk_mq_freeze_queue()
> blk_mq_quiesce_queue()
>
> blk_mq_init_sched()
>
> blk_mq_unquiesce_queue()
> blk_mq_unfreeze_queue()
>
> This obviously isn't enough to avoid the bug that we are seeing,
> but could perhaps a more general fix be to flush/wait until all
> in-flight requests have completed, and then free them, and then
> set q->elevator->type->ops. That way, all requests inserted after
> the io scheduler has been initialized, will have gone through the
> io scheduler. So all finish_request() calls should have a
> matching insert_request() call. What do you think?
q->elevator is set from inside the I/O scheduler's init_sched callback
and that callback is called with the request queue frozen. Freezing
happens by calling blk_mq_freeze_queue() and that function waits until
all previously submitted requests have finished. So I don't think that
the race described above can happen.
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-20 23:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-18 0:44 [PATCH v3 00/16] Improve I/O priority support Bart Van Assche
2021-06-18 0:44 ` [PATCH v3 01/16] block/Kconfig: Make the BLK_WBT and BLK_WBT_MQ entries consecutive Bart Van Assche
2021-06-18 17:09 ` Adam Manzanares
2021-06-18 19:49 ` Himanshu Madhani
2021-06-18 0:44 ` [PATCH v3 02/16] block/blk-cgroup: Swap the blk_throtl_init() and blk_iolatency_init() calls Bart Van Assche
2021-06-18 17:15 ` Adam Manzanares
2021-06-18 19:49 ` Himanshu Madhani
2021-06-21 14:24 ` Tejun Heo
2021-06-18 0:44 ` [PATCH v3 03/16] block/blk-rq-qos: Move a function from a header file into a C file Bart Van Assche
2021-06-18 17:22 ` Adam Manzanares
2021-06-18 19:49 ` Himanshu Madhani
2021-06-18 0:44 ` [PATCH v3 04/16] block: Introduce the ioprio rq-qos policy Bart Van Assche
2021-06-18 22:02 ` Adam Manzanares
2021-06-18 0:44 ` [PATCH v3 05/16] block/mq-deadline: Add several comments Bart Van Assche
2021-06-18 22:06 ` Adam Manzanares
2021-06-18 0:44 ` [PATCH v3 06/16] block/mq-deadline: Add two lockdep_assert_held() statements Bart Van Assche
2021-06-18 22:09 ` Adam Manzanares
2021-06-18 0:44 ` [PATCH v3 07/16] block/mq-deadline: Remove two local variables Bart Van Assche
2021-06-18 22:16 ` Adam Manzanares
2021-06-18 0:44 ` [PATCH v3 08/16] block/mq-deadline: Rename dd_init_queue() and dd_exit_queue() Bart Van Assche
2021-06-18 22:18 ` Adam Manzanares
2021-06-18 0:44 ` [PATCH v3 09/16] block/mq-deadline: Improve compile-time argument checking Bart Van Assche
2021-06-18 22:30 ` Adam Manzanares
2021-06-18 0:44 ` [PATCH v3 10/16] block/mq-deadline: Improve the sysfs show and store macros Bart Van Assche
2021-06-18 23:07 ` Adam Manzanares
2021-06-18 0:44 ` [PATCH v3 11/16] block/mq-deadline: Reserve 25% of scheduler tags for synchronous requests Bart Van Assche
2021-06-18 0:44 ` [PATCH v3 12/16] block/mq-deadline: Micro-optimize the batching algorithm Bart Van Assche
2021-06-18 0:44 ` [PATCH v3 13/16] block/mq-deadline: Add I/O priority support Bart Van Assche
2021-06-18 0:44 ` [PATCH v3 14/16] block/mq-deadline: Track I/O statistics Bart Van Assche
2021-06-18 0:44 ` [PATCH v3 15/16] block/mq-deadline: Add cgroup support Bart Van Assche
2021-06-18 0:44 ` [PATCH v3 16/16] block/mq-deadline: Prioritize high-priority requests Bart Van Assche
2021-08-20 0:45 ` Niklas Cassel
2021-08-20 18:04 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-08-20 23:05 ` Niklas Cassel
2021-08-20 23:38 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2021-08-23 7:36 ` Niklas Cassel
2021-08-23 17:15 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-08-23 23:01 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-08-24 21:33 ` Niklas Cassel
2021-06-21 16:06 ` [PATCH v3 00/16] Improve I/O priority support Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e94f62c4-a329-398d-5003-d369506d7f89@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com \
--cc=Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=Niklas.Cassel@wdc.com \
--cc=a.manzanares@samsung.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=himanshu.madhani@oracle.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).