linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Niklas Cassel <Niklas.Cassel@wdc.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
	Adam Manzanares <a.manzanares@samsung.com>,
	Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com>,
	Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 16/16] block/mq-deadline: Prioritize high-priority requests
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 16:38:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e94f62c4-a329-398d-5003-d369506d7f89@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YSA1JWt9soMSs23Z@x1-carbon>

On 8/20/21 4:05 PM, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> Thank you for your patch!
> I tested it, and it does solve my problem.

That's quick. Thanks!

> I've been thinking more about this problem.
> The problem is seen on a SATA zoned drive.
> 
> These drives have mq-deadline set as default by the
> blk_queue_required_elevator_features(q, ELEVATOR_F_ZBD_SEQ_WRITE) call in
> drivers/scsi/sd_zbc.c:sd_zbc_read_zones()
> 
> This triggers block/elevator.c:elevator_init_mq() to initialize
> "mq-deadline" as default scheduler for these devices.
> 
> I think that the problem might because that drivers/scsi/sd_zbc.c
> has created the request_queue and submitted requests, before the call
> to elevator_init_mq() is done.
> 
> elevator_init_mq() will set q->elevator->type->ops, so once that is set,
> blk_mq_free_request() will call e->type->ops.finish_request(rq),
> regardless if the request was inserted through the recently initialized
> scheduler or not.
> 
> While I'm perfectly happy with your fix, would it perhaps be possible
> to do the fix in block/elevator.c instead, so that we don't need to
> do the same type of check that you did, in each and every single
> io scheduler?
> 
> Looking at block/elevator.c:elevator_init_mq(), it seems to do:
> 
> blk_mq_freeze_queue()
> blk_mq_quiesce_queue()
> 
> blk_mq_init_sched()
> 
> blk_mq_unquiesce_queue()
> blk_mq_unfreeze_queue()
> 
> This obviously isn't enough to avoid the bug that we are seeing,
> but could perhaps a more general fix be to flush/wait until all
> in-flight requests have completed, and then free them, and then
> set q->elevator->type->ops. That way, all requests inserted after
> the io scheduler has been initialized, will have gone through the
> io scheduler. So all finish_request() calls should have a
> matching insert_request() call. What do you think?

q->elevator is set from inside the I/O scheduler's init_sched callback 
and that callback is called with the request queue frozen. Freezing 
happens by calling blk_mq_freeze_queue() and that function waits until 
all previously submitted requests have finished. So I don't think that 
the race described above can happen.

Thanks,

Bart.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-20 23:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-18  0:44 [PATCH v3 00/16] Improve I/O priority support Bart Van Assche
2021-06-18  0:44 ` [PATCH v3 01/16] block/Kconfig: Make the BLK_WBT and BLK_WBT_MQ entries consecutive Bart Van Assche
2021-06-18 17:09   ` Adam Manzanares
2021-06-18 19:49   ` Himanshu Madhani
2021-06-18  0:44 ` [PATCH v3 02/16] block/blk-cgroup: Swap the blk_throtl_init() and blk_iolatency_init() calls Bart Van Assche
2021-06-18 17:15   ` Adam Manzanares
2021-06-18 19:49   ` Himanshu Madhani
2021-06-21 14:24   ` Tejun Heo
2021-06-18  0:44 ` [PATCH v3 03/16] block/blk-rq-qos: Move a function from a header file into a C file Bart Van Assche
2021-06-18 17:22   ` Adam Manzanares
2021-06-18 19:49   ` Himanshu Madhani
2021-06-18  0:44 ` [PATCH v3 04/16] block: Introduce the ioprio rq-qos policy Bart Van Assche
2021-06-18 22:02   ` Adam Manzanares
2021-06-18  0:44 ` [PATCH v3 05/16] block/mq-deadline: Add several comments Bart Van Assche
2021-06-18 22:06   ` Adam Manzanares
2021-06-18  0:44 ` [PATCH v3 06/16] block/mq-deadline: Add two lockdep_assert_held() statements Bart Van Assche
2021-06-18 22:09   ` Adam Manzanares
2021-06-18  0:44 ` [PATCH v3 07/16] block/mq-deadline: Remove two local variables Bart Van Assche
2021-06-18 22:16   ` Adam Manzanares
2021-06-18  0:44 ` [PATCH v3 08/16] block/mq-deadline: Rename dd_init_queue() and dd_exit_queue() Bart Van Assche
2021-06-18 22:18   ` Adam Manzanares
2021-06-18  0:44 ` [PATCH v3 09/16] block/mq-deadline: Improve compile-time argument checking Bart Van Assche
2021-06-18 22:30   ` Adam Manzanares
2021-06-18  0:44 ` [PATCH v3 10/16] block/mq-deadline: Improve the sysfs show and store macros Bart Van Assche
2021-06-18 23:07   ` Adam Manzanares
2021-06-18  0:44 ` [PATCH v3 11/16] block/mq-deadline: Reserve 25% of scheduler tags for synchronous requests Bart Van Assche
2021-06-18  0:44 ` [PATCH v3 12/16] block/mq-deadline: Micro-optimize the batching algorithm Bart Van Assche
2021-06-18  0:44 ` [PATCH v3 13/16] block/mq-deadline: Add I/O priority support Bart Van Assche
2021-06-18  0:44 ` [PATCH v3 14/16] block/mq-deadline: Track I/O statistics Bart Van Assche
2021-06-18  0:44 ` [PATCH v3 15/16] block/mq-deadline: Add cgroup support Bart Van Assche
2021-06-18  0:44 ` [PATCH v3 16/16] block/mq-deadline: Prioritize high-priority requests Bart Van Assche
2021-08-20  0:45   ` Niklas Cassel
2021-08-20 18:04     ` Bart Van Assche
2021-08-20 23:05       ` Niklas Cassel
2021-08-20 23:38         ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2021-08-23  7:36           ` Niklas Cassel
2021-08-23 17:15             ` Bart Van Assche
2021-08-23 23:01               ` Damien Le Moal
2021-08-24 21:33               ` Niklas Cassel
2021-06-21 16:06 ` [PATCH v3 00/16] Improve I/O priority support Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e94f62c4-a329-398d-5003-d369506d7f89@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com \
    --cc=Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com \
    --cc=Niklas.Cassel@wdc.com \
    --cc=a.manzanares@samsung.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=himanshu.madhani@oracle.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).