This is automated email and please do not reply to this email! Dear submitter, Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list. This is a CI test results with your patch series: PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=518815 ---Test result--- Test Summary: CheckPatch FAIL 0.90 seconds GitLint PASS 0.24 seconds BuildKernel PASS 598.23 seconds TestRunner: Setup PASS 394.48 seconds TestRunner: l2cap-tester PASS 2.88 seconds TestRunner: bnep-tester PASS 2.10 seconds TestRunner: mgmt-tester PASS 31.86 seconds TestRunner: rfcomm-tester PASS 2.40 seconds TestRunner: sco-tester PASS 2.25 seconds TestRunner: smp-tester FAIL 2.28 seconds TestRunner: userchan-tester PASS 2.14 seconds Details ############################## Test: CheckPatch - FAIL - 0.90 seconds Run checkpatch.pl script with rule in .checkpatch.conf Bluetooth: fix inconsistent lock state in rfcomm_connect_ind WARNING: Unknown commit id 'fad003b6c8e3d', maybe rebased or not pulled? #6: Commit fad003b6c8e3d ("Bluetooth: Fix inconsistent lock state with WARNING: Unknown commit id 'e6da0edc24ee', maybe rebased or not pulled? #12: Later, this was changed in commit e6da0edc24ee ("Bluetooth: Acquire total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 0 checks, 14 lines checked NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace. "[PATCH] Bluetooth: fix inconsistent lock state in rfcomm_connect_ind" has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. ############################## Test: GitLint - PASS - 0.24 seconds Run gitlint with rule in .gitlint ############################## Test: BuildKernel - PASS - 598.23 seconds Build Kernel with minimal configuration supports Bluetooth ############################## Test: TestRunner: Setup - PASS - 394.48 seconds Setup environment for running Test Runner ############################## Test: TestRunner: l2cap-tester - PASS - 2.88 seconds Run test-runner with l2cap-tester Total: 40, Passed: 40 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0 ############################## Test: TestRunner: bnep-tester - PASS - 2.10 seconds Run test-runner with bnep-tester Total: 1, Passed: 1 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0 ############################## Test: TestRunner: mgmt-tester - PASS - 31.86 seconds Run test-runner with mgmt-tester Total: 448, Passed: 445 (99.3%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 3 ############################## Test: TestRunner: rfcomm-tester - PASS - 2.40 seconds Run test-runner with rfcomm-tester Total: 9, Passed: 9 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0 ############################## Test: TestRunner: sco-tester - PASS - 2.25 seconds Run test-runner with sco-tester Total: 8, Passed: 8 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0 ############################## Test: TestRunner: smp-tester - FAIL - 2.28 seconds Run test-runner with smp-tester Total: 8, Passed: 7 (87.5%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 0 Failed Test Cases SMP Client - SC Request 2 Failed 0.022 seconds ############################## Test: TestRunner: userchan-tester - PASS - 2.14 seconds Run test-runner with userchan-tester Total: 3, Passed: 3 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0 --- Regards, Linux Bluetooth