From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26C36C282C3 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 22:29:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D591C20866 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 22:29:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="WGLK5XSB" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726867AbfAVW3G (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2019 17:29:06 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-f194.google.com ([209.85.208.194]:41331 "EHLO mail-lj1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726804AbfAVW3G (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2019 17:29:06 -0500 Received: by mail-lj1-f194.google.com with SMTP id k15-v6so134448ljc.8 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:29:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ATJb8Y1QK0+DWFS5C9575PNIZ/kg7x8HH9FfSrgkB1I=; b=WGLK5XSB1+8mmb5g65v/2ltx2RQwKTpbRuDeKxSaDMZUzLtEDIHnwvd88+dzibti7f m/qpQ99vKGMgbWm2I80mSjhnoWuCKuZXGZZALyNHKkf31RX9jmp4thBWNhantnnsm0t9 wGeEnMa2a11fndE2wmWDA7/x1iSOTaiMtRxgo5K53s5FPlBfyfHKHb+JLIcIdeC+XLoM L9P2V81DZV89sPdLB2oYHkBs6HIIreq8CotEz4ptAZ1y4BQppnztVNZMdUlTr3eCTFpO bv1g6BcNXY59Y3LH/Dnx0MImDonudTiN8IbxzWDW/KGdaCemwyk/CL7Cpz0XaGWYRPvJ M24g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ATJb8Y1QK0+DWFS5C9575PNIZ/kg7x8HH9FfSrgkB1I=; b=bKEVceo5caoe0qW0koyjcksxvm7ogac73ufVL4GfJWcS3dE/0Iq7jcZJBDUIQ99hYq zq648Aqev9iNUKwQ7k5iySDCPO4+2QOefOgvGQi+yRJJK8IUvhXC3ODzRyAPeCc5qJwY vMgfpiWRpWSQdnr5iVTPsuYjj/bbaI41GQFISPrUF7WlkJvZim1FLHPLBdvS64jCPsZC 5zBM/VSU0aRRrOt9+PjYhEDC8ixxDSvDmvjcO9F3xFPnXyNNvYWseB6RDr23HR69KyYX 1RHiVBlOeeT+32G0AJitWSk93jf15rWrU+fRISAAoOo3wRFyiFhJZWc+ySplCOa6fwNY exsg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukcxyFszoIwFcsiW7iAwtS//YG29qmgW9bNf+0j8U5k6Ds3DscHf Cvog/3LCUv11RjvcLBSWmmq0xid9EpQBdxLAI+xwTQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN4oiPniTUo1bcuJEkQ8dvHztC/NIPTgsxSsGDXUI+KpR8FA1FBQioCBOlZ9LPKHMSTM0EcN2sIjGM59Ztefs1I= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9395:: with SMTP id g21-v6mr2157913ljh.78.1548196144151; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:29:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181117010748.24347-1-rajatja@google.com> <20190118223407.64818-1-rajatja@google.com> In-Reply-To: From: Rajat Jain Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:28:27 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] usb: split code locating ACPI companion into port and device To: Marcel Holtmann Cc: Johan Hedberg , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "David S. Miller" , Dmitry Torokhov , Alex Hung , Bluez mailing list , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, netdev , Rajat Jain , Dmitry Torokhov , Raghuram Hegde , chethan.tumkur.narayan@intel.com, "Ghorai, Sukumar" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Hi Marcel, On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 11:51 AM Marcel Holtmann wrote: > > Hi Rajat, > > > In preparation for handling embedded USB devices let's split > > usb_acpi_find_companion() into usb_acpi_find_companion_for_device() and > > usb_acpi_find_companion_for_port(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov > > Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain > > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > Tested-by: Sukumar Ghorai > > --- > > v4: Add Acked-by and Tested-by in signatures. > > v3: same as v1 > > v2: same as v1 > > > > drivers/usb/core/usb-acpi.c | 133 +++++++++++++++++++----------------- > > 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-) > > what is the plan here? I take this via bluetooth-next tree? Yes, I'd think that would be the best plan. Dmitry / Greg - do you have any objections / suggestions? > > Regards > > Marcel >