From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Refactor main loop in extent_readpages
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 15:40:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181212144052.GX23615@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181129164131.4716-1-nborisov@suse.com>
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 06:41:31PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> extent_readpages processes all pages in the readlist in batches of 16,
> this is implemented by a single for loop but thanks to an if condition
> the loop does 2 things based on whether we've filled the batch or not.
> Additionally due to the structure of the code there is an additional
> check which deals with partial batches.
>
> Streamline all of this by explicitly using two loops. The outter one is
> used to process all pages while the inner one just fills in the batch
> of 16 (currently). Due to this new structure the code guarantees that
> all pages are processed in the loop hence the code to deal with any
> leftovers is eliminated.
>
> This also enable the compiler to inline __extent_readpages:
>
> ./scripts/bloat-o-meter fs/btrfs/extent_io.o extent_io.for
>
> add/remove: 0/1 grow/shrink: 1/0 up/down: 660/-820 (-160)
> Function old new delta
> extent_readpages 476 1136 +660
> __extent_readpages 820 - -820
> Total: Before=44315, After=44155, chg -0.36%
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> index 8332c5f4b1c3..233f835dd6f8 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> @@ -4093,43 +4093,38 @@ int extent_writepages(struct address_space *mapping,
> int extent_readpages(struct address_space *mapping, struct list_head *pages,
> unsigned nr_pages)
nr_pages becomes unused now. I've checked the MM code that calls here
and it's guaranteed that the number of list 'pages' members is same as
nr_pages.
> {
> +#define BTRFS_PAGES_BATCH 16
> +
> struct bio *bio = NULL;
> - unsigned page_idx;
> unsigned long bio_flags = 0;
> - struct page *pagepool[16];
> - struct page *page;
> + struct page *pagepool[BTRFS_PAGES_BATCH];
I don't think we need the extra define, if
struct page *pagepool[16];
...
for (nr = 0; nr < ARRAY_SIZE(pagepool) ...
Otherwise ok, nice cleanup.
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-12 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-29 16:41 [PATCH] btrfs: Refactor main loop in extent_readpages Nikolay Borisov
2018-12-12 14:40 ` David Sterba [this message]
2018-12-12 15:16 ` Nikolay Borisov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181212144052.GX23615@twin.jikos.cz \
--to=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nborisov@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).