linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/8] btrfs: Reduce critical section in btrfs_init_dev_replace_tgtdev
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 13:54:39 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190514105445.23051-3-nborisov@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190514105445.23051-1-nborisov@suse.com>

There is no point in holding btrfs_fs_devices::device_list_mutex
while initialising fields of the not-yet-published device. Instead,
hold the mutex only when the newly initialised device is being
published. I think holding device_list_mutex here is redundant
altogether, because at this point BTRFS_FS_EXCL_OP is set which
prevents device removal/addition/balance/resize to occur.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c b/fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c
index c738ba460682..ac6600a00188 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c
@@ -237,7 +237,6 @@ static int btrfs_init_dev_replace_tgtdev(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 	}
 	rcu_assign_pointer(device->name, name);
 
-	mutex_lock(&fs_info->fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
 	set_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_WRITEABLE, &device->dev_state);
 	device->generation = 0;
 	device->io_width = fs_info->sectorsize;
@@ -256,6 +255,8 @@ static int btrfs_init_dev_replace_tgtdev(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 	device->dev_stats_valid = 1;
 	set_blocksize(device->bdev, BTRFS_BDEV_BLOCKSIZE);
 	device->fs_devices = fs_info->fs_devices;
+
+	mutex_lock(&fs_info->fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
 	list_add(&device->dev_list, &fs_info->fs_devices->devices);
 	fs_info->fs_devices->num_devices++;
 	fs_info->fs_devices->open_devices++;
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-14 10:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-14 10:54 [PATCH 0/8] Misc improvements to dev-replace code Nikolay Borisov
2019-05-14 10:54 ` [PATCH 1/8] btrfs: Don't opencode sync_blockdev in btrfs_init_dev_replace_tgtdev Nikolay Borisov
2019-05-14 10:59   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-14 10:54 ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2019-05-14 11:05   ` [PATCH 2/8] btrfs: Reduce critical section " Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-14 10:54 ` [PATCH 3/8] btrfs: Remove impossible WARN_ON Nikolay Borisov
2019-05-14 11:09   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-14 10:54 ` [PATCH 4/8] btrfs: Ensure btrfs_init_dev_replace_tgtdev sees up to date values Nikolay Borisov
2019-05-14 10:54 ` [PATCH 5/8] btrfs: Streamline replace sem unlock in btrfs_dev_replace_start Nikolay Borisov
2019-05-14 12:50   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-14 10:54 ` [PATCH 6/8] btrfs: Explicitly reserve space for devreplace item Nikolay Borisov
2019-05-14 12:56   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-14 10:54 ` [PATCH 7/8] btrfs: Ensure replaced device doesn't have pending chunk allocation Nikolay Borisov
2019-05-15 16:52   ` David Sterba
2019-05-17  7:44     ` [PATCH v2] " Nikolay Borisov
2019-05-17 14:28       ` David Sterba
2019-05-14 10:54 ` [PATCH 8/8] btrfs: Remove redundant assignment of tgt_device->commit_total_bytes Nikolay Borisov
2019-05-14 12:59   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-05-28 16:47 ` [PATCH 0/8] Misc improvements to dev-replace code David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190514105445.23051-3-nborisov@suse.com \
    --to=nborisov@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).