From: "Scott E. Blomquist" <sb@techsquare.com>
To: Jojo <jojo@automatix.de>
Cc: "Scott E. Blomquist" <sb@techsquare.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: btrfs hang on nfs?
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 08:31:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <23605.63394.330818.203495@techsquare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6d8d3b43-dc73-42b8-7c70-2fb8a3b0d98c@automatix.de>
Jojo writes:
>
> Within scheduler there were some changes according to device queueing.
> Kernels after 4.16 and before 4.19.8 were problematic, as we recognized
> here.
> This seemed to be a regression on the "kyber" scheduler, as recognized here:
> [root@pc7 sysctl.d]# cat /sys/block/sdc/queue/scheduler
> mq-deadline [kyber] bfq none
>
> As work around you may change the disc scheduler to an "old" one, like
>
> Test it like this for all of your devices:
> root@pc7:~/ # echo bfq > /sys/block/sdX/queue/scheduler
>
> For permanent add a file config to your /etc/sysctl.d.
> EXAMPLE, edit it to your requirements.
>
> [root@pc7 sysctl.d]# cat /etc/sysctl.d/90-sysscheduler.conf
> #disk scheduler
> block.sda.queue.scheduler = md-deadline
> block.sdb.queue.scheduler = md-deadline
> block.sdg.queue.scheduler = bfq
> block.sdh.queue.scheduler = bfq
> block.sdi.queue.scheduler = bfq
>
>
> Hope this may help you.
> It did work for me here.
>
> Better Idea is to upgrade the kernel to 4.19.13 (which is a LTS Kernel)
>
> mit freundlichen Gr en
> J rgen Sauer
Thank you so much, I would have never guessed that.
In my case the scheduler was set to deadline
cat /sys/block/sd[a-c]/queue/scheduler
noop [deadline] cfq
noop [deadline] cfq
noop [deadline] cfq
I have set it to cfq, I did not see an option for bfq.
I am also building 4.19.13 and will swap that in ASAP.
Thanks again,
Cheers,
sb. Scott Blomquist
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-09 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-09 10:54 btrfs hang on nfs? Scott E. Blomquist
2019-01-09 12:14 ` Jojo
2019-01-09 13:31 ` Scott E. Blomquist [this message]
2019-01-10 11:46 ` Scott E. Blomquist
2019-01-10 11:51 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-01-10 12:00 ` Scott E. Blomquist
2019-01-14 11:42 ` Scott E. Blomquist
2019-01-14 12:11 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-01-14 13:13 ` Scott E. Blomquist
2019-01-14 13:28 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-01-15 8:16 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-01-15 14:36 ` Scott E. Blomquist
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=23605.63394.330818.203495@techsquare.com \
--to=sb@techsquare.com \
--cc=jojo@automatix.de \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).