linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] btrfs-progs: lowmem: fix false alert if extent item has been repaired
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 18:30:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3363e342-9acc-95d4-cf70-2872fc8b6258@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181023094147.7906-4-suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>



On 2018/10/23 下午5:41, Su Yue wrote:
> Previously, @err are assigned immediately after check but before
> repair.
> repair_extent_item()'s return value also confuses the caller. If
> error has been repaired and returns 0, check_extent_item() will try
> to continue check the nonexistent and cause flase alerts.
> 
> Here make repair_extent_item()'s return codes only represents status
> of the extent item, error bits are passed by pointer.
> Move the change of @err after repair.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  check/mode-lowmem.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/check/mode-lowmem.c b/check/mode-lowmem.c
> index 76e7be81ceb1..769b3141de8b 100644
> --- a/check/mode-lowmem.c
> +++ b/check/mode-lowmem.c
> @@ -3788,35 +3788,35 @@ out:
>  /*
>   * Only delete backref if REFERENCER_MISSING now
>   *
> - * Returns <0   the extent was deleted
> - * Returns >0   the backref was deleted but extent still exists, returned value
> - *               means error after repair
> + * Returns <0   the whole extent item was deleted
> + * Returns >0   the backref was deleted but extent still exists, @err_ret
> + *		will be set to be error bits after repair.

Well, I have to admit the parameter list is really human friendly from
the initial design.

In fact, the only real user of @err is just that "if ((err &
(REFERENCER_MISSING | REFERENCER_MISMATCH)) == 0)" line.

We can in fact get rid of that @err parameter and do that check at the
only caller of repair_extent_item().


And then redefine the return value.

Like "Return < 0 if we failed to repair backref for the extent.
Return 0 if we repaired the backref for the extent".

[snip]
>  
> -	if (err && repair) {
> +	if (tmp_err && repair) {
>  		ret = repair_extent_item(fs_info->extent_root, path,
>  			 key.objectid, num_bytes, parent, root_objectid,
> -			 owner, owner_offset, ret);
> -		if (ret < 0)

If follow my above method, here the code can be a little easier:
	if (tmp_err && repair) {
		if (!(tmp_err & (REFERENCER_MISSING |
		    REFENCER_MISMATCH)) {
			err |= tmp_err;
			goto next;
		}
		ret = repair_extent_item(...);
		if (ret < 0)
			err |= tmp_err;
	} else if (tmp_err) {
		err |= tmp_err;
	}

Without the need to passing @err into repair_extent_item() nor modifying
@err in that function.

Thanks,
Qu

> +			 owner, owner_offset, &tmp_err);
> +		err |= tmp_err;
> +
> +		if (tmp_err & FATAL_ERROR || ret < 0)
>  			goto out;
> -		if (ret) {
> +		/*
> +		 * the error has been repaired which means the extent item
> +		 * is still existed with other backrefs, go to check next.
> +		 */> +		if (ret > 0) {
> +			eb = path->nodes[0];
> +			slot = path->slots[0];
> +			ei = btrfs_item_ptr(eb, slot, struct btrfs_extent_item);
> +			item_size = btrfs_item_size_nr(eb, slot);
>  			goto next;
> -			err = ret;
>  		}
> +	} else {
> +		err |= tmp_err;
>  	}
>  
> -	ptr += btrfs_extent_inline_ref_size(type);
> +	ptr_offset += btrfs_extent_inline_ref_size(type);
>  	goto next;
>  
>  out:
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-23 10:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-23  9:41 [PATCH 00/13] btrfs-progs: fixes of file extent in original and lowmem check Su Yue
2018-10-23  9:41 ` [PATCH 01/13] btrfs-progs: lowmem: add argument path to punch_extent_hole() Su Yue
2018-10-23 10:04   ` Qu Wenruo
2018-10-24  1:18     ` Su Yue
2018-12-02 14:34   ` [PATCH v2 " damenly.su
2018-10-23  9:41 ` [PATCH 02/13] btrfs-progs: lowmem: move nbytes check before isize check Su Yue
2018-10-23 10:07   ` Qu Wenruo
2018-12-02 14:38   ` [PATCH v2 " damenly.su
2018-10-23  9:41 ` [PATCH 03/13] btrfs-progs: lowmem: fix false alert if extent item has been repaired Su Yue
2018-10-23 10:30   ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2018-10-24  1:27     ` Su Yue
2018-10-24  1:24       ` Qu Wenruo
2018-12-02 14:45   ` [PATCH v2 " damenly.su
2018-10-23  9:41 ` [PATCH 04/13] btrfs-progs: lowmem: fix false alert about the existence of gaps in the check_file_extent Su Yue
2018-10-24  0:13   ` Qu Wenruo
2018-10-23  9:41 ` [PATCH 05/13] btrfs-progs: lowmem: check unaligned disk_bytenr for extent_data Su Yue
2018-10-24  0:13   ` Qu Wenruo
2018-10-23  9:41 ` [PATCH 06/13] btrfs-progs: lowmem: rename delete_extent_tree_item() to delete_item() Su Yue
2018-10-24  0:15   ` Qu Wenruo
2018-10-23  9:41 ` [PATCH 07/13] btrfs-progs: lowmem: delete unaligned bytes extent data under repair Su Yue
2018-10-24  0:16   ` Qu Wenruo
2018-10-23  9:41 ` [PATCH 08/13] btrfs-progs: Revert "btrfs-progs: Add repair and report function for orphan file extent." Su Yue
2018-10-24  0:28   ` Qu Wenruo
2018-10-23  9:41 ` [PATCH 09/13] btrfs-progs: Revert "btrfs-progs: Record orphan data extent ref to corresponding root." Su Yue
2018-10-24  0:29   ` Qu Wenruo
2018-11-07  9:09     ` Su Yanjun <suyj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
2018-11-07  9:14       ` Qu Wenruo
2018-10-23  9:41 ` [PATCH 10/13] btrfs-progs: check: fix bug in find_possible_backrefs Su Yue
2018-10-24  0:34   ` Qu Wenruo
2018-11-07  6:28     ` Su Yanjun <suyj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
2018-11-07  6:40       ` Qu Wenruo
2018-10-23  9:41 ` [PATCH 11/13] btrfs-progs: check: Delete file extent item with unaligned extent backref Su Yue
2018-10-24  0:45   ` Qu Wenruo
2018-11-07  6:21     ` Su Yanjun <suyj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
2018-11-07  6:38       ` Qu Wenruo
2018-11-07  7:04         ` Su Yanjun <suyj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
2018-11-07  7:13           ` Qu Wenruo
2018-10-23  9:41 ` [PATCH 12/13] btrfs-progs: tests: add case for inode lose one file extent Su Yue
2018-10-23  9:41 ` [PATCH 13/13] btrfs-progs: fsck-test: enable lowmem repair for case 001 Su Yue
2018-10-23  9:45 ` [PATCH 00/13] btrfs-progs: fixes of file extent in original and lowmem check Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3363e342-9acc-95d4-cf70-2872fc8b6258@gmx.com \
    --to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).