From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] btrfs-progs: lowmem: fix false alert if extent item has been repaired
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 18:30:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3363e342-9acc-95d4-cf70-2872fc8b6258@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181023094147.7906-4-suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
On 2018/10/23 下午5:41, Su Yue wrote:
> Previously, @err are assigned immediately after check but before
> repair.
> repair_extent_item()'s return value also confuses the caller. If
> error has been repaired and returns 0, check_extent_item() will try
> to continue check the nonexistent and cause flase alerts.
>
> Here make repair_extent_item()'s return codes only represents status
> of the extent item, error bits are passed by pointer.
> Move the change of @err after repair.
>
> Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> check/mode-lowmem.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/check/mode-lowmem.c b/check/mode-lowmem.c
> index 76e7be81ceb1..769b3141de8b 100644
> --- a/check/mode-lowmem.c
> +++ b/check/mode-lowmem.c
> @@ -3788,35 +3788,35 @@ out:
> /*
> * Only delete backref if REFERENCER_MISSING now
> *
> - * Returns <0 the extent was deleted
> - * Returns >0 the backref was deleted but extent still exists, returned value
> - * means error after repair
> + * Returns <0 the whole extent item was deleted
> + * Returns >0 the backref was deleted but extent still exists, @err_ret
> + * will be set to be error bits after repair.
Well, I have to admit the parameter list is really human friendly from
the initial design.
In fact, the only real user of @err is just that "if ((err &
(REFERENCER_MISSING | REFERENCER_MISMATCH)) == 0)" line.
We can in fact get rid of that @err parameter and do that check at the
only caller of repair_extent_item().
And then redefine the return value.
Like "Return < 0 if we failed to repair backref for the extent.
Return 0 if we repaired the backref for the extent".
[snip]
>
> - if (err && repair) {
> + if (tmp_err && repair) {
> ret = repair_extent_item(fs_info->extent_root, path,
> key.objectid, num_bytes, parent, root_objectid,
> - owner, owner_offset, ret);
> - if (ret < 0)
If follow my above method, here the code can be a little easier:
if (tmp_err && repair) {
if (!(tmp_err & (REFERENCER_MISSING |
REFENCER_MISMATCH)) {
err |= tmp_err;
goto next;
}
ret = repair_extent_item(...);
if (ret < 0)
err |= tmp_err;
} else if (tmp_err) {
err |= tmp_err;
}
Without the need to passing @err into repair_extent_item() nor modifying
@err in that function.
Thanks,
Qu
> + owner, owner_offset, &tmp_err);
> + err |= tmp_err;
> +
> + if (tmp_err & FATAL_ERROR || ret < 0)
> goto out;
> - if (ret) {
> + /*
> + * the error has been repaired which means the extent item
> + * is still existed with other backrefs, go to check next.
> + */> + if (ret > 0) {
> + eb = path->nodes[0];
> + slot = path->slots[0];
> + ei = btrfs_item_ptr(eb, slot, struct btrfs_extent_item);
> + item_size = btrfs_item_size_nr(eb, slot);
> goto next;
> - err = ret;
> }
> + } else {
> + err |= tmp_err;
> }
>
> - ptr += btrfs_extent_inline_ref_size(type);
> + ptr_offset += btrfs_extent_inline_ref_size(type);
> goto next;
>
> out:
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-23 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-23 9:41 [PATCH 00/13] btrfs-progs: fixes of file extent in original and lowmem check Su Yue
2018-10-23 9:41 ` [PATCH 01/13] btrfs-progs: lowmem: add argument path to punch_extent_hole() Su Yue
2018-10-23 10:04 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-10-24 1:18 ` Su Yue
2018-12-02 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 " damenly.su
2018-10-23 9:41 ` [PATCH 02/13] btrfs-progs: lowmem: move nbytes check before isize check Su Yue
2018-10-23 10:07 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-12-02 14:38 ` [PATCH v2 " damenly.su
2018-10-23 9:41 ` [PATCH 03/13] btrfs-progs: lowmem: fix false alert if extent item has been repaired Su Yue
2018-10-23 10:30 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2018-10-24 1:27 ` Su Yue
2018-10-24 1:24 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-12-02 14:45 ` [PATCH v2 " damenly.su
2018-10-23 9:41 ` [PATCH 04/13] btrfs-progs: lowmem: fix false alert about the existence of gaps in the check_file_extent Su Yue
2018-10-24 0:13 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-10-23 9:41 ` [PATCH 05/13] btrfs-progs: lowmem: check unaligned disk_bytenr for extent_data Su Yue
2018-10-24 0:13 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-10-23 9:41 ` [PATCH 06/13] btrfs-progs: lowmem: rename delete_extent_tree_item() to delete_item() Su Yue
2018-10-24 0:15 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-10-23 9:41 ` [PATCH 07/13] btrfs-progs: lowmem: delete unaligned bytes extent data under repair Su Yue
2018-10-24 0:16 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-10-23 9:41 ` [PATCH 08/13] btrfs-progs: Revert "btrfs-progs: Add repair and report function for orphan file extent." Su Yue
2018-10-24 0:28 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-10-23 9:41 ` [PATCH 09/13] btrfs-progs: Revert "btrfs-progs: Record orphan data extent ref to corresponding root." Su Yue
2018-10-24 0:29 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-11-07 9:09 ` Su Yanjun <suyj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
2018-11-07 9:14 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-10-23 9:41 ` [PATCH 10/13] btrfs-progs: check: fix bug in find_possible_backrefs Su Yue
2018-10-24 0:34 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-11-07 6:28 ` Su Yanjun <suyj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
2018-11-07 6:40 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-10-23 9:41 ` [PATCH 11/13] btrfs-progs: check: Delete file extent item with unaligned extent backref Su Yue
2018-10-24 0:45 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-11-07 6:21 ` Su Yanjun <suyj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
2018-11-07 6:38 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-11-07 7:04 ` Su Yanjun <suyj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
2018-11-07 7:13 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-10-23 9:41 ` [PATCH 12/13] btrfs-progs: tests: add case for inode lose one file extent Su Yue
2018-10-23 9:41 ` [PATCH 13/13] btrfs-progs: fsck-test: enable lowmem repair for case 001 Su Yue
2018-10-23 9:45 ` [PATCH 00/13] btrfs-progs: fixes of file extent in original and lowmem check Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3363e342-9acc-95d4-cf70-2872fc8b6258@gmx.com \
--to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).