linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Erik Jensen <erikjensen@rkjnsn.net>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: "bad tree block start" when trying to mount on ARM
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 18:17:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <36ae40c5-0c76-d6f5-54ea-8e70aefec8a4@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj6ewO7PGBoN565WYz_bqL6nGszweNouP-Fphok9+GGpGn8gg@mail.gmail.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1938 bytes --]



On 2019/5/21 下午4:34, Erik Jensen wrote:
> I have a 5-drive btrfs filesystem. (raid-5 data, dup metadata). I can
> mount it fine on my x86_64 system, and running `btrfs check` there
> reveals no errors. However, I am not able to mount the filesystem on
> my 32-bit ARM board, which I am hoping to use for lower-power file
> serving. dmesg shows the following:

Have you ever tried btrfs check on the arm board?

I have an odroid C2 board at hand, but never tried armhf build on it,
only tried aarch64.
It may be an interesting adventure.

Thanks,
Qu

> 
> [   83.066301] BTRFS info (device dm-3): disk space caching is enabled
> [   83.072817] BTRFS info (device dm-3): has skinny extents
> [   83.553973] BTRFS error (device dm-3): bad tree block start, want
> 17628726968320 have 396461950000496896
> [   83.554089] BTRFS error (device dm-3): bad tree block start, want
> 17628727001088 have 5606876608493751477
> [   83.601176] BTRFS error (device dm-3): bad tree block start, want
> 17628727001088 have 5606876608493751477
> [   83.610811] BTRFS error (device dm-3): failed to verify dev extents
> against chunks: -5
> [   83.639058] BTRFS error (device dm-3): open_ctree failed
> 
> Is this expected to work? I did notice that there are gotchas on the
> wiki related to filesystems over 8TiB on 32-bit systems, but it
> sounded like they were mostly related to running the tools, as opposed
> to the filesystem driver itself. (Each of the five drives is
> 8TB/7.28TiB)
> 
> If this isn't expected, what should I do to help track down the issue?
> 
> Also potentially relevant: The x86_64 system is currently running
> 4.19.27, while the ARM system is running 5.1.3.
> 
> Finally, just in case it's relevant, I just finished reencrypting the
> array, which involved doing a `btrfs replace` on each device in the
> array.
> 
> Any pointers would be appreciated.
> 
> Thanks.
> 


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-21 10:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-21  8:34 "bad tree block start" when trying to mount on ARM Erik Jensen
2019-05-21  8:56 ` Patrik Lundquist
2019-05-21  9:01   ` Erik Jensen
2019-05-21  9:18 ` Hugo Mills
2019-05-22 16:02   ` Erik Jensen
2019-06-26  7:04     ` Erik Jensen
2019-06-26  8:10       ` Qu Wenruo
     [not found]         ` <CAMj6ewO229vq6=s+T7GhUegwDADv4dzhqPiM0jo10QiKujvytA@mail.gmail.com>
2019-06-28  8:15           ` Qu Wenruo
2021-01-18 10:50             ` Erik Jensen
     [not found]             ` <CAMj6ewMqXLtrBQgTJuz04v3MBZ0W95fU4pT0jP6kFhuP830TuA@mail.gmail.com>
2021-01-18 11:07               ` Qu Wenruo
2021-01-18 11:55                 ` Erik Jensen
2021-01-18 12:01                   ` Qu Wenruo
2021-01-18 12:12                     ` Erik Jensen
2021-01-19  5:22                       ` Erik Jensen
2021-01-19  9:28                         ` Erik Jensen
2021-01-20  8:21                           ` Qu Wenruo
2021-01-20  8:30                             ` Qu Wenruo
     [not found]                               ` <CAMj6ewOqCJTGjykDijun9_LWYELA=92HrE+KjGo-ehJTutR_+w@mail.gmail.com>
2021-01-26  4:54                                 ` Erik Jensen
2021-01-29  6:39                                   ` Erik Jensen
2021-02-01  2:35                                     ` Qu Wenruo
2021-02-01  5:49                                       ` Su Yue
2021-02-04  6:16                                         ` Erik Jensen
2021-02-06  1:57                                           ` Erik Jensen
2021-02-10  5:47                                             ` Qu Wenruo
2021-02-10 22:17                                               ` Erik Jensen
2021-02-10 23:47                                                 ` Qu Wenruo
2021-02-18  1:24                                                   ` Qu Wenruo
2021-02-18  4:03                                                     ` Erik Jensen
2021-02-18  5:24                                                       ` Qu Wenruo
2021-02-18  5:49                                                         ` Erik Jensen
2021-02-18  6:09                                                           ` Qu Wenruo
2021-02-18  6:59                                                             ` Erik Jensen
2021-02-18  7:24                                                               ` Qu Wenruo
2021-02-18  7:59                                                                 ` Erik Jensen
2021-02-18  8:38                                                                   ` Qu Wenruo
2021-02-18  8:52                                                                     ` Erik Jensen
2021-02-18  8:59                                                                       ` Qu Wenruo
2021-02-20  2:47                                                                         ` Erik Jensen
2021-02-20  3:16                                                                           ` Qu Wenruo
2021-02-20  4:28                                                                             ` Erik Jensen
2021-02-20  6:01                                                                               ` Qu Wenruo
2021-02-21  5:36                                                                                 ` Erik Jensen
2021-02-18  7:25                                                               ` Erik Jensen
2019-05-21 10:17 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=36ae40c5-0c76-d6f5-54ea-8e70aefec8a4@gmx.com \
    --to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    --cc=erikjensen@rkjnsn.net \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).