From: "André Malm" <admin@sheepa.org>
To: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Btrfs send with parent different size depending on source of files.
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 23:58:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a870ee41-983a-5786-eb14-4513de4da875@sheepa.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJCQCtRLU=Cv9Lg75Vc4KO18N0y4hvoCuo9WV+rbKg2DTb+o7A@mail.gmail.com>
Ok, but I don't want to keep old snapshots of the child volumes. Only
the latest and then diffing it in regards to the master. Would that be
possible?
On 2019-02-18 23:28, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 2:36 PM André Malm <admin@sheepa.org> wrote:
>> The reason why I'm using reflinks instead of snapshots is because the
>> master subvolume is large and will contain hundreds of gigabytes worth
>> of data. Now if I change / remove, say 10 GB worth of data from the
>> master subvolume unrelated to the child subvolume I don't want those
>> gigabytes sent down the wire with btrfs send as they are unrelated. Also
>> I want to be able to after time, when required, add more data from the
>> master subvolume to the child. Thats why I can't split the master
>> subvolume into parts of related data.
> OK, is it your plan to have both master and child on the destination
> Btrfs? So you plan to do a 'btrfs send' without -p option to send the
> entire master subvolume (snapshot) to destination first? And then you
> want to create the child efficiently using a difference between master
> and child? Yes I think that might work but I haven't tried it. But of
> course, master must already be on the destination.
>
> btrfs sub create master
> ##populate the master
> btrfs sub create childofmaster
> cp --reflink master/bunchoffiles childofmaster/
> btrfs sub snap -r master master.20190218-initial
> btrfs sub snap -r childofmaster childofmaster.20190218-initial
> btrfs send master.20190218-initial | btrfs receive /destination/
> btrfs send -p master.20190218-initial childofmaster.20190218-initial |
> btrfs receive /destination/
>
> However your subsequent incremental send/receive has nothing to do
> with master anymore; you indicate above you don't intent to keep
> master up to date on the destination. Just child. In that case the
> incremental changes look like this:
>
> cp --reflink master/morefiles childofmaster/
> btrfs sub snap -r childofmaster childofmaster.20190218T1905
> btrfs send child -p childofmaster.20190218-initial
> childofmaster.20190218T1905 | btrfs receive /destination/
> cp --reflink master/yetmorefiles childofmaster/
> btrfs sub snap -r childofmaster childofmaster.20190219T1301
> btrfs send child childofmaster.20190218T1905
> childofmaster.20190218T1905 | btrfs receive /destination/
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-18 22:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-14 11:37 Btrfs send with parent different size depending on source of files André Malm
2019-02-14 22:37 ` Chris Murphy
2019-02-15 4:00 ` Remi Gauvin
2019-02-15 18:38 ` Chris Murphy
2019-02-15 18:56 ` Remi Gauvin
2019-02-16 20:10 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2019-02-15 17:45 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2019-02-15 19:11 ` Chris Murphy
2019-02-16 20:26 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2019-02-16 20:32 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2019-02-18 18:00 ` Chris Murphy
2019-02-15 19:29 ` Remi Gauvin
2019-02-15 19:41 ` Remi Gauvin
2019-02-16 20:08 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2019-02-17 3:11 ` Remi Gauvin
2019-02-18 13:05 ` André Malm
2019-02-18 18:06 ` Chris Murphy
2019-02-18 19:58 ` André Malm
2019-02-18 20:59 ` Graham Cobb
2019-02-18 21:22 ` Chris Murphy
2019-02-18 21:36 ` André Malm
2019-02-18 22:28 ` Chris Murphy
2019-02-18 22:58 ` André Malm [this message]
2019-02-18 23:49 ` Chris Murphy
2019-02-18 23:58 ` André Malm
2019-02-19 0:16 ` Chris Murphy
2019-02-19 0:17 ` Chris Murphy
2019-02-19 0:28 ` André Malm
2019-02-19 3:54 ` Chris Murphy
2019-02-19 12:05 ` André Malm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a870ee41-983a-5786-eb14-4513de4da875@sheepa.org \
--to=admin@sheepa.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lists@colorremedies.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).