Re: MSG_CONFIRM RX messages with SocketCAN known as unreliable under heavy load?

[Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>]

Hello Harald,

On 24.06.21 17:21, Harald Mommer wrote:

> The device application is closed source, runs under the COQOS hypervisor 
> which is also closed source.

What is this 'device application' in the sketch below?

>> Can you sketch a quick block diagram showing guest, host, Virtio device,
>> Virtio driver, etc...
> 
> I hope this arrives on the list as is been sent and not garbled:
> 
>       Guest 2                    | Guest3
> ----------------                | ----------------
> ! cangen,      !                | ! cangen,      !
> ! candump,     !                | ! candump,     !
> ! cansend      !                | ! cansend      !
> ! using vcan0  !                | ! using can0   !
> ----------------                | ----------------
>   ^                              |             ^
>   !  ---------------------       |             !
>   !  ! Service process   !       |             !
>   !  ! in user space     !       |             !
>   !  ! virtio-can device !       |             !
>   !  ! forwarding vcan0  !       |             !
>   !  ---------------------       |             !

Hopefully not this "Service process in user space" ???

If so, this is a very questionable approach!

To route/forward/manipulate CAN frames between CAN network interfaces 
there is a CAN gateway module 'can-gw' which can be controlled over 
PF_NETLINK.

The can-gw runs super efficient and fast inside kernel space in the 
SOFTIRQ context.

E.g. 22.000 CAN frames/s with 6% sys load on a 2 core i7 from 2012, 
here: https://youtu.be/O3eOjfTl1yk?t=89

Just type cangw from the can-utils to get an impression of the powerful 
options.

You can even calculate E2E CRCs and XOR checksums after doing content 
mods on the fly.

>   !    ^               ^         |             !
>   !    !               !         |             !
> --------------------------------------------------
>   !    !   Device side ! kernel  | Driver side ! kernel
>   v    v               v         |             v
> ---------------- -------------- | ----------------
> ! Device Linux ! ! HV support ! | ! Driver Linux !
> !    VCan      ! !   module   ! | !  Virtio CAN  !
> !    vcan0     ! ! on device  ! | !     can0     !
> !              ! !   side     ! | !              !
> ---------------- -------------- | ----------------
>         ^               ^        |        ^
>         !               !        |        !
> --------------------------------------------------
>         !               !                 ! Hypervisor
>         v               v                 v
> --------------------------------------------------
> !                     COQOS-HV                   !
> --------------------------------------------------
> 

(..)

> can be handled. Need the command line switch anyway now to do experiments.

Now with cangw ?!? ;-)

Regards,
Oliver