From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>,
Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jth@kernel.org>,
linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>, Ted Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Pavel Reichl <preichl@redhat.com>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/14] xfs: Refactor xfs_isilocked()
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 08:49:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210607154901.GH2945738@locust> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210607145236.31852-7-jack@suse.cz>
On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 04:52:17PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> From: Pavel Reichl <preichl@redhat.com>
>
> Refactor xfs_isilocked() to use newly introduced __xfs_rwsem_islocked().
> __xfs_rwsem_islocked() is a helper function which encapsulates checking
> state of rw_semaphores hold by inode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Reichl <preichl@redhat.com>
> Suggested-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> Suggested-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
> Suggested-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
> 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> index 0369eb22c1bb..6247977870bd 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> @@ -342,9 +342,34 @@ xfs_ilock_demote(
> }
>
> #if defined(DEBUG) || defined(XFS_WARN)
> -int
> +static inline bool
> +__xfs_rwsem_islocked(
> + struct rw_semaphore *rwsem,
> + int lock_flags,
> + int shift)
> +{
> + lock_flags >>= shift;
> +
> + if (!debug_locks)
> + return rwsem_is_locked(rwsem);
> + /*
> + * If the shared flag is not set, pass 0 to explicitly check for
> + * exclusive access to the lock. If the shared flag is set, we typically
> + * want to make sure the lock is at least held in shared mode
> + * (i.e., shared | excl) but we don't necessarily care that it might
> + * actually be held exclusive. Therefore, pass -1 to check whether the
> + * lock is held in any mode rather than one of the explicit shared mode
> + * values (1 or 2)."
Extra double-quote not needed here.
With that fixed,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
(You can delete the previous review tag.)
--D
> + */
> + if (lock_flags & (1 << XFS_SHARED_LOCK_SHIFT)) {
> + return lockdep_is_held_type(rwsem, -1);
> + }
> + return lockdep_is_held_type(rwsem, 0);
> +}
> +
> +bool
> xfs_isilocked(
> - xfs_inode_t *ip,
> + struct xfs_inode *ip,
> uint lock_flags)
> {
> if (lock_flags & (XFS_ILOCK_EXCL|XFS_ILOCK_SHARED)) {
> @@ -359,15 +384,13 @@ xfs_isilocked(
> return rwsem_is_locked(&ip->i_mmaplock.mr_lock);
> }
>
> - if (lock_flags & (XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL|XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED)) {
> - if (!(lock_flags & XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED))
> - return !debug_locks ||
> - lockdep_is_held_type(&VFS_I(ip)->i_rwsem, 0);
> - return rwsem_is_locked(&VFS_I(ip)->i_rwsem);
> + if (lock_flags & (XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL | XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED)) {
> + return __xfs_rwsem_islocked(&VFS_I(ip)->i_rwsem, lock_flags,
> + XFS_IOLOCK_FLAG_SHIFT);
> }
>
> ASSERT(0);
> - return 0;
> + return false;
> }
> #endif
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> index ca826cfba91c..1c0e15c480bc 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> @@ -262,12 +262,19 @@ static inline bool xfs_inode_has_bigtime(struct xfs_inode *ip)
> * Bit ranges: 1<<1 - 1<<16-1 -- iolock/ilock modes (bitfield)
> * 1<<16 - 1<<32-1 -- lockdep annotation (integers)
> */
> -#define XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL (1<<0)
> -#define XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED (1<<1)
> -#define XFS_ILOCK_EXCL (1<<2)
> -#define XFS_ILOCK_SHARED (1<<3)
> -#define XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL (1<<4)
> -#define XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED (1<<5)
> +
> +#define XFS_IOLOCK_FLAG_SHIFT 0
> +#define XFS_ILOCK_FLAG_SHIFT 2
> +#define XFS_MMAPLOCK_FLAG_SHIFT 4
> +
> +#define XFS_SHARED_LOCK_SHIFT 1
> +
> +#define XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL (1 << XFS_IOLOCK_FLAG_SHIFT)
> +#define XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED (XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL << XFS_SHARED_LOCK_SHIFT)
> +#define XFS_ILOCK_EXCL (1 << XFS_ILOCK_FLAG_SHIFT)
> +#define XFS_ILOCK_SHARED (XFS_ILOCK_EXCL << XFS_SHARED_LOCK_SHIFT)
> +#define XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL (1 << XFS_MMAPLOCK_FLAG_SHIFT)
> +#define XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED (XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL << XFS_SHARED_LOCK_SHIFT)
>
> #define XFS_LOCK_MASK (XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL | XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED \
> | XFS_ILOCK_EXCL | XFS_ILOCK_SHARED \
> @@ -410,7 +417,7 @@ void xfs_ilock(xfs_inode_t *, uint);
> int xfs_ilock_nowait(xfs_inode_t *, uint);
> void xfs_iunlock(xfs_inode_t *, uint);
> void xfs_ilock_demote(xfs_inode_t *, uint);
> -int xfs_isilocked(xfs_inode_t *, uint);
> +bool xfs_isilocked(struct xfs_inode *, uint);
> uint xfs_ilock_data_map_shared(struct xfs_inode *);
> uint xfs_ilock_attr_map_shared(struct xfs_inode *);
>
> --
> 2.26.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-07 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-07 14:52 [PATCH 0/14 v7] fs: Hole punch vs page cache filling races Jan Kara
2021-06-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 01/14] mm: Fix comments mentioning i_mutex Jan Kara
2021-06-07 15:31 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-10 9:06 ` Ming Lei
2021-06-10 10:40 ` Jan Kara
2021-06-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 02/14] documentation: Sync file_operations members with reality Jan Kara
2021-06-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 03/14] mm: Protect operations adding pages to page cache with invalidate_lock Jan Kara
2021-06-07 16:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-08 12:19 ` Jan Kara
2021-06-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 04/14] mm: Add functions to lock invalidate_lock for two mappings Jan Kara
2021-06-07 15:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 05/14] ext4: Convert to use mapping->invalidate_lock Jan Kara
2021-06-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 06/14] ext2: Convert to using invalidate_lock Jan Kara
2021-06-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 07/14] xfs: Refactor xfs_isilocked() Jan Kara
2021-06-07 15:49 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2021-06-08 22:18 ` Dave Chinner
2021-06-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 08/14] xfs: Convert to use invalidate_lock Jan Kara
2021-06-07 15:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-08 12:23 ` Jan Kara
2021-06-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 09/14] xfs: Convert double locking of MMAPLOCK to use VFS helpers Jan Kara
2021-06-07 15:57 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 10/14] zonefs: Convert to using invalidate_lock Jan Kara
2021-06-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 11/14] f2fs: " Jan Kara
2021-06-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 12/14] fuse: " Jan Kara
2021-06-10 12:42 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-06-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 13/14] ceph: Fix race between hole punch and page fault Jan Kara
2021-06-07 14:52 ` [PATCH 14/14] cifs: " Jan Kara
2021-06-08 11:54 ` [PATCH 0/14 v7] fs: Hole punch vs page cache filling races Jan Kara
2021-06-15 9:17 [PATCH 0/14 v8] " Jan Kara
2021-06-15 9:17 ` [PATCH 07/14] xfs: Refactor xfs_isilocked() Jan Kara
2021-06-16 5:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-16 8:53 ` Jan Kara
2021-06-16 15:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-16 15:57 ` Jan Kara
2021-06-17 16:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-17 16:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-06-17 7:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-17 8:53 ` Jan Kara
2021-06-17 8:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-17 16:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-07-12 16:55 [PATCH 0/14 v9] fs: Hole punch vs page cache filling races Jan Kara
2021-07-12 16:55 ` [PATCH 07/14] xfs: Refactor xfs_isilocked() Jan Kara
2021-07-15 13:40 [PATCH 0/14 v10] fs: Hole punch vs page cache filling races Jan Kara
2021-07-15 13:40 ` [PATCH 07/14] xfs: Refactor xfs_isilocked() Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210607154901.GH2945738@locust \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=jth@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=preichl@redhat.com \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=sfrench@samba.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).