linux-cifs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Aurélien Aptel" <aaptel@suse.com>
To: ronnie sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-cifs <linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [EXPERIMENT] new mount API verbose errors from userspace
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2021 12:18:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k0qoxz7r.fsf@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAN05THRV_Tns4MTO-GFNg0reR+HJKa1BCSQ0m23PTSryGNPCeg@mail.gmail.com>

ronnie sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com> writes:
> I like this, this is very nice.
> But, as you touch upon, it requires we know in mount.c what type each
> argument is.
> Which is problematic because the list of mount arguments in cifs.ko
> has a fair amount of crunch
> and I think it would be unworkable to keep cifs-utils and cifs.ko in
> lockstep for every release where
> we modify a mount argument.

We could do some basic pattern matching: like if has no '=', assume
boolean flag. If value only made of number, assume int. String for
everything else.

But this might fail on numbers which are actually string
(e.g. password=123456).

> What I think we should have is a ioctl(),  system-call,
> /proc/fs/cifs/options,  where we can query the kernel/file-system
> module
> for "give me a list of all recognized mount options and their type"
> i.e. basically a way to fetch the "struct fs_parameter_spec" to userspace.
>
> This is probably something that would not be specific to cifs, but
> would apply to all filesystem modules.

That sounds like a good idea yes. I wonder if David Howells has
considered this.

We can already sort-of do this actually. We can have a special boolean
option "help" which on the kernel side would log the list of
options&types in the fs_context log (as "i" (info) messages).

Cheers,
-- 
Aurélien Aptel / SUSE Labs Samba Team
GPG: 1839 CB5F 9F5B FB9B AA97  8C99 03C8 A49B 521B D5D3
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, DE
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah HRB 247165 (AG München)


  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-04  0:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-01 18:56 [EXPERIMENT] new mount API verbose errors from userspace Aurélien Aptel
2021-03-01 20:57 ` Aurélien Aptel
2021-03-02 21:59 ` ronnie sahlberg
2021-03-03 11:18   ` Aurélien Aptel [this message]
2021-03-09 17:37   ` David Howells
2021-03-09 18:29     ` Aurélien Aptel
2021-03-18 13:10       ` [EXPERIMENT v2] " Aurélien Aptel
2021-04-09  4:36         ` Steve French
2021-04-12 17:52           ` [EXPERIMENT v3] " Aurélien Aptel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87k0qoxz7r.fsf@suse.com \
    --to=aaptel@suse.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ronniesahlberg@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).